Cases

ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Can-dance Kagan, Mary LaCoste, Joycelyn Cole, and Annette Watt (together, “Plaintiffs”), and defendant City of New Orleans (the “City”).1 For the following reasons, the City’s motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND

Qua, J. In this action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff from a fall on a stairway on premises of the defendant where alcoholic beverages were sold to be consumed on the premises, the defendant excepts (1) to the refusal of the judge to charge the jury that the plaintiff was a licensee and not an invitee on the part of the premises where the accident happened, and (2) to the instruction actually given that

On August 6, 2008, during ladies’ night at the Publick House, a Southampton brewery restaurant, the defendant and a woman were dancing on top of a table. Andrew Reister (hereinafter the victim), a bouncer, asked the defendant to get off the table. After the defendant ignored the victim’s request, the victim either pulled or pushed the defendant off the table and both men ended up on the floor. During the scuffle that ensued, the defendant got behind the

Hall, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the judgment appealed from and to order a new trial, with the following memorandum: While I agree with certain determinations made by my colleagues in the majority, I must respectfully dissent in light of certain errors at trial, which, in my view, require reversal in this case. Specifically, I believe that it was error for the trial court to admit into evidence the hearsay testimony of a

768 F.Supp.2d 396 (2011) Khalid McBETH and Carmine Cascone, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated who were employed by Gabrielli Truck Sales, Ltd.; Gabrielli Truck Sales of Connecticut, L.L.C.; Gabrielli Truck Service, Inc.; and Gabrielli Ford Truck Sales & Service, Inc.; and/or any other entities affiliated with or controlled by Gabrielli Truck Sales, Ltd.; Gabrielli Truck Sales of Connecticut, L.L.C.; Gabrielli Truck Se

ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Smartling, Inc. ("Smartling") and Defendant Skawa Innovation Ltd. ("Skawa") are both translation technology companies that provide language translation services for mobile and internet-based clients.1 On November 4, 2015, Smartling filed its First Amended Complaint asserting six causes of action against Skawa for alleged acts of trademark and trade dres

*267MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Alfred Morris, Terrell Gardner, and Andre Henry (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), the New York Labor Laws (the “NYLL”), and New York common law. In the instant motion, plaintiffs request that this Court: (1) authorize the distri

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jeong Woo Kim (“Kim”) brings this putative collective action on behalf of *443himself and other similarly-situated persons, seeking to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 20

DECISION AND ORDER McMAHON, District Judge: On January 12, 2012, Diallo Hamadou (“Hamadou”), Muhammad Shahjahan (“Shahjahan”), and Frank Asiedu (“Asiedu”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action for unpaid wages, including failure to pay overtime compensation, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and under the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), Article 19 § 65

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. Plaintiffs Cemil Gurkan Guzelgurgenli (“Guzelgurgenli”), Hasan Kasikci (“H. Kasikci”), and Bilal Habes Kasikci (“B. Kasikci”, collectively “the Plaintiffs”), filed a putative collective action suit against various defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (“FLSA”) and the New York State Labor Law (“N.Y. Labor La

750 F.Supp.2d 469 (2010) Martin GUILLEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MARSHALLS OF MA, INC., a Delaware corporation; Marmaxx Operating Corporation, d/b/a Marmaxx Group, a Delaware Corporation; The TJX Companies Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 9575(LAP)(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York

OPINION AND ORDER GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Andrew Young has sued Cooper Cameron Corporation (“Cooper”) on the ground that it has failed to pay premium overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 203, 207. Young alleges that he regularly worked more than forty hours per week in his position as a Product Design Specialist (“PDS”) and that Coope

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. When faced with the claim that two products are confusingly similar, a person’s natural reaction is to place the two products side-by-side, and then, looking back and forth at them, to ascertain how comparable the two goods are. This process of simultaneous observation is, without doubt, an efficient way of identifying similarities and differences betwee

340 F.Supp.2d 415 (2004) Louis Vuitton MALLETIER, Plaintiff, v. DOONEY & BOURKE, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 2004. *419 Theodore C. Max, Kevin N. Ainsworth, Charles A. LeGrand, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C., New York, New York, Howard J. Suss

Appellate Case: 15-6190 Document: 237-1 Date Filed: 01/13/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 13, 2026

561 F.Supp.2d 368 (2008) Louis Vuitton MALLETIER, Plaintiff, v. DOONEY & BOURKE, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 30, 2008. *372 Steven Kimelman, Esq., Michael A. Grow, Esq., Alison Arden Besunder, Esq., Arent Fox LLP, Theodore C. Max, Esq., Sheppard Mullin Richter &

EDMONDSON, J. I. Introduction T1 Petitioner, a former employee, filed a workers' compensation claim and alleged she was injured on-the-job and needed surgery. Her former employer (employer) argued that she was barred from receiving workers' compensation because she alleged a cumulative-trauma injury and she had not worked a continuous 180-day period for that employer. The administrative law judge denied her

(2008) Roberta C. TSE, Plaintiff, v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. 03 Civ. 6234(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GERARD E. LYNCH, District Judge. Plaintiff Roberta C. Tse sued defendant UBS Financial Services, Inc. ("UBS"), alleging that UBS discriminated against her on the

944 A.2d 1088 (2008) Linda M. JACKSON, Appellant v. LOEWS WASHINGTON CINEMAS, INC., Appellee. No. 03-CV-1048. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 21, 2004. Decided March 27, 2008. *1091 H. Vincent McKnight, Jr., Washington, DC, for appellant. Andrew J. Terrell, with whom Jennifer S. Jackm

315 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2004) AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. AAR PARTS TRADING, INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. No. 02-21193-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. April 2, 2004. *1320 Lawrence Dean Goodman, Diane Noller Wells, Catherine Fran Hoffman, Robert J. Kuntz, Devine,