Cases

Order, Supreme Court, New York (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered June 13, 2016, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to attach certain stock certificates deposited with the court in this interpleader action, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of increasing the amount of the undertaking to $100,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

REED SMITH LLP, Plaintiff, againstLEED HR, LLC, BIG RED INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LTD, GENESIS MERCHANT PARTNERS GP LLC, UPLIFT CAPITAL LLC, CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, INC. Index No. 654213/2012 For Intervenors, Law Office of Wallace Neel,

74 F.3d 218 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,*Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Keith McGLAMERY; Fulbright & Jaworski, a Partnership;Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., Defendants-Appellees,andPenny Parker; Johnson, Bromberg & Leeds, Defendants. No. 94-2150. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 21, 2021 Decided March 1, 2022 No. 20-1319 WENDT CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 20-1328 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement

344 F.3d 1359 FESTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI CO., LTD., a/k/a SMC Corporation, and SMC Pneumatics, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-1066. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 26, 2003. Rehearing En Banc Denied November 5, 2003. COPYRIGHT M

ALMOND, Judge. Formica Corporation appeals from the decision of The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissing its opposition to the application 1 of the Newnan Corporation to register “NEW-MICA” for *487

876 F.2d 8 Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,911In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTVCorporation, et al., Debtors.BANCTEXAS DALLAS, N.A., Elliott Associates and Speer, Leeds& Kellogg, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTV Corporation,and RepSteel Overseas Finance, N.V., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1208, Docket 89-5008. United States Cou

880 F.2d 1509 Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,965In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTVCorporation, et al., Debtors.In re BANCTEXAS DALLAS, N.A., Elliott Associates, and Speer,Leeds & Kellogg, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTV Corporation,and RepSteel Overseas Finance, N.V., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1208, Docket 89-5008. United

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CONNIE HAGAN AND ROY DALE HAGAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No.: N20C-10-208 PEL v. ) ) Boston Scientific Corporation ) (D/B/A Mansfield Scientific, Inc.) ) And Micr

Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge This is a wrongful death action arising out of the death of Neil Lewis who was killed during an incident on July 7, 2015. Plaintiff Tiffany Hodges is the guardian ad litem to Lewis's minor children and sole heirs, D. Lewis and J. Lewis. Plaintiffs Karen Joyce Lewis and Alfredo Lewis are Lewis's parents. Plaintiffs filed this survival and wrongful death action against Defendants The Hertz

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY FISHER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ¢ a, Appellants, CPU4-19-003443 Vv. CHRISTOPHER J. TIGANI, Ny NY Ne Ne Ne Ne Ne Ne Na Ne Appellee. Submitted: February 8, 2021 Decided: April 9, 2021 Thomas Marconi, Esq. Christopher Tigani 1813 N. Franklin Street 3399 Concord Pike Wilmington, DE 19802 P.O. Box 7752 Aittorney for Appellants Wilmington, DE 19803 Pro se Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON APPELLANTS’ MOT

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH. HUGHES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs sued Defendants in 2010 for infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,296,805. After our most recent remand in this case, the district court invalidated claims 24 and 25 of U.S. Patent No. RE44,153, the reissue of the ’805 patent. We conclude that the district court possessed subject matter jurisdiction when it granted summary judg

[1] The Oklahoma Corporation Commission (Commission), upon application by Leede Exploration Company (Leede), ordered the de-spacing of two 1440-acre drilling units in Washita and Beckham Counties. It ordered the establishment of six 640-acre spacing units encompassing land from the larger de-spaced units. The new units are spaced for five formations, lower Morrow through Hunton. *Page 1338 [2] When the initial Corporation Commission spacing

634 P.2d 711 (1981) Blanche KUYKENDALL, Leo Keathley, Stella Matlock, Lula E. Adams, W.F. Goode, D.H. Maddoux, and Charlie B. Crook, Appellants, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION of the State of Oklahoma, Leede Exploration, Union Oil Company of California, and El Paso Natural Gas Company, Appellees. No. 52877. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 22, 1981. Gordon F. Brown,

969 F.2d 15 In re LASER ARMS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION.Frank VAVRA; Mary Francis Vavra; Joseph F. Vavra; DavidWolff; Gina Pierleoni; Anthony F. Viscardi; Ilene Dodd;Frank Viscardi; Twin V's Partnership; Gordon Swirsky;Kathleen Hernandez Jackman; William F. Pacific; SydoniaBuxbaum; Stanley Peltz; Michael Cosmano; Ricardo Triano;Larry G. Smith; Frank J. Corch; Norman T. McIver; JohnJones; A.E. Rand

DYK, Circuit Judge. Carbon Activated Corp. (“Carbon”) appeals a decision of the United States Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Carbon’s challenge to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) liquidation of three entries of activated carbon. Because Carbon could have availed itself of the jurisdictional pro

HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge: Two brothers who had once worked together in a family corporation in Florida came to a parting of the ways, and their separate ways brought them into hot litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada over patent rights. In a jury trial, the old Florida corporation prevailed, obtaining a declaratory judgment that the d

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: I. This case arises out of the relationship between Strategic Income Fund (“SIF”), a Georgia limited liability company 1 formed *1294 for the purpose of trading in options primarily throu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARCELORMITTAL, ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE ET LORRAINE, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AK STEEL CORPORATION, SEVERSTAL DEARBORN, INC., WHEELING-NISSHIN INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2016-1357 ______________________ Appeal from the United State

Opinion by Judge Rogers, James Leed (claimant) has filed a petition for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) affirming a referee’s decision denying him benefits for his alleged total disability on the ground that he failed to meet his burden to prove that the incidence of the condition of which he complained—aggravation of his disabling lung condition— was greater in the casting