Cases

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge Wynn wrote the opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer and Judge King joined. WYNN, Circuit Judge: Early on the morning of May 15, 2010, Sergeant Howard Phillips (“Sergeant Phillips”), a police officer employed by Defendant Town of Seaboard, North Carolina (“Seaboard”), shot and wounded Plaintiff Brian C. Lee, S

OSCN Found Document:TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLC OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

OSCN Found Document:TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLC OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

Matter of Save Harrison, Inc. v Town/Village of Harrison, NY (2019 NY Slip Op 00444) Matter of Save Harrison, Inc. v Town/Village of Harrison, NY 2019 NY Slip Op 00444 Decided on January 23, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This case, originally brought against 23 defendants where the eight above-captioned now remain, comes before the court on motions premised on Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure separately filed March 10, 2015, on behalf of defen*784dants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“JMM”) (DE 151) and Form

174 S.E.2d 116 (1970) 8 N.C. App. 219 R. Frank EVERETT, H. T. Highsmith and H. H. Worsley, Co-Partners, trading and doing business as Planters Warehouse No. One and No. Two v. TOWN OF ROBERSONVILLE and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company. No. 702SC102. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 27, 1970. Certiorari Denied July 14, 1970.

156 Ga. App. 24 (1980) 274 S.E.2d 74 SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD v. TOWNS. 60009. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued June 5, 1980. Decided October 7, 1980. W. H. Young, III, Jerome M. Rothschild, for appellant. Billy E. Moore, H. Baxter Harcourt, for appellee. SMITH, Judge. Appellant railr

OPINION RILEY, Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Dow-Par, Inc., appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees the Lee Corp., Construction Design of Indiana, Inc., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. We affirm. ISSUES1 We address the following issues: 1. Does _ IND.CODE -

135 Ga. App. 540 (1975) 218 S.E.2d 263 SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DOCKERY et al. 50517. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued April 7, 1975. Decided July 14, 1975. Rehearing Denied July 31, 1975. Jay, Garden & Sherrell, H. J. Quincey, John Edward Smith, III, for appellant. Farr

OAKES, Circuit Judge: A barge owner (Seaboard) and a tug owner (Moran) are before the court on cross appeals, each blaming the other for the loss of the lives of two bargemen, whose survivors have already been compensated by settlement. The parties here reserved their rights against each other under the settlement.1 The court below held, 320 F.Supp. 229, in this exceptionally well-briefed case, tha

251 S.E.2d 474 (1979) PROVIDENCE PROPERTIES, INC. v. UNITED VIRGINIA BANK/SEABOARD NATIONAL, TRUSTEE, etc., et al. VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK et al. v. UNITED VIRGINIA BANK/SEABOARD NATIONAL, TRUSTEE, etc., et al. Record Nos. 770599, 770478. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 12, 1979. *475 B. M. Millner, Newport News (Sv

161 S.E.2d 590 (1968) 274 N.C. 32 Bertha C. PRICE v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. Brooks M. PRICE v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. Linda Carol PRICE, by her Next Friend, Brooks M. Price v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. Janice Marie PRICE, by her Next Friend, Brooks M. Price v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. No. 534. Supreme Court of North

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANKIE GREER, No. 23-55607 Plaintiff, D.C. No. and 3:19-cv-00378- JO-DEB SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, LLC; PRISON LEGAL NEWS; VOICE OF SAN DIEGO, OPINION Intervenors-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defenda

OSCN Found Document:BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSA BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSA2018 OK 100Case Number: 116510Decided: 12/18/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 100, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

COMBS, C.J.: ¶ 1 The Petitioner, Kelli Braitsch, injured her 1 right arm while employed by the City of Tulsa and after the effective date of the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act (AWCA), 85A O.S. §§ 1 - 125. Through her collective bargaining agreement, Braitsch was paid her full salary in lieu of tempor

EDMONDSON, J. ¶ 1 The District Court of Osage County had three related but distinct proceedings before it involving wind farms in Osage County, and orders in each of the three were appealed to this Court.1 One of the appeals was adjudicated by our recent opinion in Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of Adjustment, 2016 OK 113, 387 P.3d 333. The remaining two appeals ar

OSCN Found Document:OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OSCN navigation Home Courts

104 S.E.2d 181 (1958) 248 N.C. 577 Bryant N. THOMPSON and wife, Mae M. Thompson, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 463. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 30, 1958. *184 Douglass & McMillan, Raleigh, and Jones & Jones, Rockingham, for plaintiff appellees. Bynum & Bynum, Rocki

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ II, District Judge. Robert A. Hayes (“Plaintiff’), a Nassau County Police Officer assigned to the Marine Bureau, commenced this Jones Act seamen’s action on December 15, 2009 against his employer, Defendant County of Nassau (the “County” or “Third-Party Plaintiff’), to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by the County’s negligence and the unseawo

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Appeal and Error, 4CJ, p. 1007, n. 74; Evidence, 23CJ, p. 41, n. 71; Railroads, 33Cyc, p. 981, n. 81; p. 1016, n. 66; p. 1017, n. 72, 73; p. 1042, n. 25; p. 1104, n. 33; p. 1128, n. 63; p. 1134, n. 9; p. 1140, n. 36; As to imputed negligence of driver of automobile to guest, see annotation in 8 L.R.A. (N.S.) 597; L.R.A. 1915A, 961; 2 R.C.L. 1207; 1 R.C.L. Supp. 743; 4 R.C.L. Supp. 159; 5 R.C.L. Supp. 148