⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lee v. Petrovsky”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-02-17 · Published · cited 15× · 185 So. 3d 700; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269; 2016 WL 625385
. LEVINE, J. •Appellants appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of HSBC Bank. We find HSBC proved standing as the holder of thé note because the allonge containing the blank endorsement was sufficiently affixed to the note. See Purificato v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 182 So.3d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). We also find no error in the admission of H
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986-08-20 · Published · cited 33× · 798 F.2d 1194; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28814
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Red Martin Cain, a federal inmate at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners (MCFP) at Springfield, Missouri, appeals from the District Court’s 1 2 dismis-sal of his petition und
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991-06-05 · Published · cited 1997× · 935 F.2d 1015; 91 Daily Journal DAR 6560; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4282; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11221; 1991 WL 91604
CHOY, Circuit Judge: Sammy Terrell, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from a November 30, 1989 summary judgment order dismissing his action with prejudice. Terrell alleges that the district court erred by (1) denying Terrell’s request for appointment of counsel; (2) denying his Rule 56(f) motion to stay
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-10-27 · Published · cited 0× · 85 N.E.3d 922
Vaidik, Chief Judge. Case Summary Following a car accident, Tony Pe-trovski retained attorney Samuel G. Vaza-nellis to represent him. Attorney Vazanel-lis filed the complaint one day before the statute-of-limitations period expired but did not serve the.defendant. Once a month, Petrovski called Attorney Vazanellis to che
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 31 2020, 11:00 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jul 02 2020, 9:58 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-04-12 · Published · cited 113× · 854 F.3d 131; 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 423; 2017 WL 1337227; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6305
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”), black-car drivers in the greater New York City area, brought this action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims against Defendants-Appellees (“Defendants”), owners of black-car “base licenses” and affiliat
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-12-26 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 26 2018, 8:13 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals t
Muhammad v. Carlsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988-04-26 · Published · cited 6× · 845 F.2d 175; 1988 WL 36613
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Imam ’Shahid Muhammad (“Muhammad”), a prisoner at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri (“MCFP”), appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint, arguing that medical regulations governing his placement in the AIDS2 unit at MCFP endowed him with a “liberty interest” under the Du
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jul 12 2019, 7:27 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Cour
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003-07-03 · Published · cited 14× · 307 A.D.2d 748; 762 N.Y.S.2d 556; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7899
Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Grow, J.), entered March 13, 2002, which dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict of no cause for action. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for medical malpractice on the basis of a jury verdict of no cause f
Ward v. State.2public domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-02-26 · Published · cited 11× · 2015 Ark. 61; 455 S.W.3d 818; 2015 Ark. LEXIS 93
KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice _JjThis is a death penalty case with a long history before this court. The facts of Ward’s underlying case are as follows: On August 11, 1989, Little Rock Police Sergeant Michael Middleton was patrolling the area near the Jackpot convenience store on Rodney Parham Drive. Upon
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jul 25 2018, 9:03 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Nooner v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014-06-26 · Published · cited 33× · 2014 Ark. 296; 438 S.W.3d 233; 2014 WL 2932282; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 403
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice. | íAppellant, Terrick Terrell Nooner, moves this court to recall the mandate that this court issued on direct appeal affirming his conviction for capital murder and his sentence of death by lethal injection. Nooner v. State, 822 Ark. 87, 907 S.W.2d 677 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1148, 116 S.Ct. 1436, 134 L.Ed.2d 558 (1996). Noon-er asks this court to vacate
District Court, D. Delaware · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 630 F. Supp. 2d 373; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51994; 2009 WL 1726339
630 F.Supp.2d 373 (2009) NORTH EMERSON-WEST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Walter REDMAN, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 78-014-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 17, 2009. *374 James Arthur Biggins, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, DE, Pro se Movant. Erika Yvonne Tross, Deputy Attorney General, Delawa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-01-03 · Published · cited 54× · 739 F.3d 131; 2014 WL 26556
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge FLOYD joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Mary Fox contends that Elk Run Coal Company committed fraud on the court and thereby deprived her husband, coal miner Gary Fox, of nearly a decade of benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act (“BLBA”). T
Harris v. Bornhorstpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-01-14 · Published · cited 185× · 513 F.3d 503; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 724; 2008 WL 114853
MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which McKINLEY, D.J., joined. GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 523-27), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Anthony Harris (“Harris”) filed suit against Defendants-Appellees Amanda Spies Bornhorst (“Spies”)1 and Tuscarawas Cou
Hughes v. Bowerspublic domain
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989-03-02 · Published · cited 4× · 711 F. Supp. 1574; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4770; 1989 WL 44525
711 F.Supp. 1574 (1989) George HUGHES, Petitioner, v. Michael A. BOWERS, et al., Respondent. Civ. A. No. 4:88-cv-68-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Division. March 2, 1989. *1575 *1576 Jerome J. Froelich, McKenney & Froelich, Atlanta, Ga., for George Hughes. De
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 57 F.3d 1074; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23353; 1995 WL 353165
57 F.3d 1074NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action. Amit KAPOOR, by and through his father Dr. Adarsh K. Kapoor, Appellant,v.SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF STATE; Regional Director ChicagoPassport Agency, Appellees.
Cummings v. Casparipublic domain
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 797 F. Supp. 747; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12474; 1992 WL 207265
MEMORANDUM GUNN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Bruce Cummings, formerly an inmate at Missouri Eastern Correctional Center (MECC), now incarcerated at Potosí Correctional Center, alleges that defendants, MECC prison officials, denied him due process in certain disciplinary proceedings, subjected him to cruel and unusua