Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lee v. Norris”
Lee v. Norris Plumbing & Heating, Inc.public domain
2014-4888 (Centre) Affirmed'
Lee v. Norris Plumbing & Heating, Inc.public domain
2014-4888 (Centre) Affirmed'
Lee v. Norris Plumbing & Heating, Inc.public domain
2014-4888 (Centre) Affirmed'
Samuel Lee Norris v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-18-00577-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SAMUEL LEE NORRIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal f
Louise Helen Pack Dover v. Norris Lee Doverpublic domain
12/08/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 13, 2020 Session LOUISE HELEN PACK DOVER v. NORRIS LEE DOVER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 172548-2 Clarence Pridemore, Jr., Chancellor No. E2
Norris v. Norrispublic domain
GRIFFIS, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Dwayne Norris appeals the Jones County Chancery Court’s decision to award a $5,000 judgment to Jacqueline Norris. Once again, an appellant in a domestic-relations case compares his case to that famous Jerry Reed hit song “She Got the Goldmine (I Got the Shaft).” We find error in the chancellor’s $5,000 award and remand the case for further proceedings. ¶
Ledell Lee v. Larry Norrispublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 03-1978EA _____________ Ledell Lee, * * Appellee, * * On Appeal from the United v. * States District Court
People v. Norrispublic domain
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
State v. Norrispublic domain
TOOKEY, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for five counts of unauthorized use of a vehicle (Counts 2 through 6), ORS 164.135, and one count of first-degree criminal mischief (Count 7), ORS 164.365. Defendant raises two assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, defendant makes an unpreserved argument that the trial court erred in failing to merge the guilty verdicts on Counts 2 through 6 into a single
Norris v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
State v. Norrispublic domain
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, JUDGE | lAfter filing an application for post-conviction relief, defendant, Michael Norris, received leave to file this out-of-time appeal following his conviction and sentencing for vehicular homicide in violation of La. R.S. 14:32.1 and for first degree vehicular negligent injuring, while under the influence of alcohol, in violation of La. R.S. 14:39.2. Defendant’s appointed counsel has filed an
Norris v. Littlepublic domain
By Judge Nathan C. Lee The issue before this Court is whether Plaintiff is the owner of a one-eighth interest in a piece of real estate. Facts Ashton Little (“Mr. Little”) acquired a tract of land in Surry County, Virginia, by deed dated May 12, 1955. Prior to his death on September 1, 1980, Mr. Little conveyed two parcels of the land to third parties. In Mr.
Norris v. Reinboldpublic domain
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00066-CV M. Lawrence Naumann and Naumann Farm, LLC, Appellants v. Edward R. Lee and wife, Josephine R. Lee; Edward J. Lee and wife Zenaida Lee; Robert D. Norris and wife, Dana K. Norris; Diana Toler and Von Toler, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 08-0
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00066-CV M. Lawrence Naumann and Naumann Farm, LLC, Appellants v.
Norris v. Salazarpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. The plaintiff, Cenny C. Norris, brings this action against her former employer, the Commission of Fine Arts (“CFA”), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.
Norris v. Lee's Auto Partspublic domain
Upon review of all the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, MODIFIES and AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner as follows: The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as STIP
Commonwealth v. Norrispublic domain
The Commonwealth appeals the order of the trial court holding that three violations of the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act ("the Wiretap Act"), 1 charged against appellee, are barred by the statute of limitations.2 *Page 1027 Finding this holding to be in error, we reverse. Appellee, Jeffrey David Norris ("Norris"), was
Howard v. Norrispublic domain
616 F.3d 799 (2010) Timothy Lamont HOWARD, Appellee, v. Larry NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Appellant. No. 09-2826. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 12, 2010. Filed: August 12, 2010. *800 Lauren Elizabeth Heil, AAG, argued and briefed, Little Rock, AR, for A
McGehee v. Norrispublic domain
588 F.3d 1185 (2009) Jason Farrell McGEHEE, Appellee, v. Larry NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellant. Jason Farrell McGehee, Appellant, v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee. Nos. 08-1182, 08-1513. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 2009. Filed December 16, 2009