Cases

Justice SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court. *1771 The Social Security Act allows for judicial review of "any final decision ... made after a hearing" by the Social Security Administration (SSA).

DISCUSSION An ALJ applies a well-established five-step evaluation process to determine whether a claimant is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, familiarity with which is presumed. See Bowen v. City of New York , 476 U.S. 467, 470-71,

Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General granted, and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below.

Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Deborah Lee Prince ("Prince") brings this appeal under section 405(g) of title 42 of the United States Code from the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("SSA"), which denied her application for Title II disability insurance benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income. See Comp

Deepak Gupta, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.

HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge INTRODUCTION Betsy Lee Guttierez brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act seeking review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security that denied her applications for disability insurance benefits ("DIB") and Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Titles II and XVI of the Act. ECF No. 1. The Court has jurisdiction over t

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge Janet Caterino ("Caterino" or "plaintiff") seeks judicial review of the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by Nancy A. Berryhill ("the Commissioner" or "defendant"), the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("the SSA"). Pending before the Court are plaintiff's motion to reverse or remand the Commissioner's decision (Docket No. 14) and defendant'

William C. Lee, Judge This matter is before the court for judicial review of a final decision of the defendant *749Commissioner of Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB), as provided for in the Social Security Act. Section 205(g) of the Act provides, inter alia, "[a]s part of his a

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff Rhonda Callaway challenges the denial of her claim for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. On April 29, 2016, Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey, to whom this matter had been referred for full case management, issued his Report and Recommendation. Judge Harvey recommended that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") be affirmed. Thereafter, Callaway filed

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.

SO ORDERED .

MEMORANDUM ** Jill Graziano appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Graziano’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Ghanim v. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154, 1159 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.

ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Traci Lee Brooks, filed a Complaint in this Court on July 21, 2017, seeking review of the Commissioner's decision to deny her claim for Social Security benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. and 1381

*953 MORITZ, Circuit Judge. The Acting Commissioner appeals the district court’s order reversing her decision to deny Marla Vallejo’s application for supplemental security income benefits and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. Because the district court’s order rests on a misapplic

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Denying Plaintiff’s Motion fob Judgment OF ReVEBSAL; GeANTING DEFENDANT’S Motion foe Judgment of Affiemance I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Ms,,Kyla Williams, unsuccessfully applied for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. Her appeal was rejected b

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Paulette Jackson brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking reversal of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for benefits. The matter is before the Court on Jackson’s mot

BERZON, Circuit Judge: Maged Saleh Shaibi appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq . In addition to contesting the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") evaluation of medical opinions, a challenge we reject, Shai

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH A, ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge This case was assigned to the undersigned for all purposes. See 03/01/2016 Minute Order. 2 Currently pending for determination are Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal (“Plaintiffs Mo

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Maged Saleh Shaibi appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. In addition to contesting the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) evaluation of medical opinions, a challenge we reject, Shaibi’s case presents a famil

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURIE L. WELLINGTON, No. 16-15188 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:14-cv-01207- SMS NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION