Cases

LEE, P.J., for the Court. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS ¶ 1. On the night of January 17, 2004, Neal and Sherry Haley were entertaining several couples in their home. Kim McTeer, Sherry’s sister, and her husband Lee were present, along with Matthew Azlin and his wife, Karyn. While the couples were inside eating dinner, Sherry looked out the window and saw that the cab of Lee’s truck was ill

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the appellant’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

02/21/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 3, 2025 TERRY LEE v. JOHNATHAN RICHARDSON, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 24CV-368 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge No. M2024-01130-C

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge Introduction Robert E. Lee (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of one count of second-degree statutory rape, two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, and one count of incest. Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing both the victim, S.V. (Victim), and a police officer to testify that Victim was afraid Defendant

02/22/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHERMAN LEE HARRIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County Nos. 6505, 13CR50 J. Weber McCraw, Judge _____________________________

Wood, Chief Judge. While a serving of meat from a prison kitchen would not prompt most Americans to run to a federal courthouse, it raises a critical problem for Indiana inmate Roman Lee Jones. Jones adheres to a sect of Islam that requires its members to follow a diet that regularly includes halal meat. It would not cost the state of Indiana a single penny to provide Jones with the diet he has requested. The only ques

03/24/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 4, 2019 Session SHERILYN MARY DAWSON v. DANA LEE DAWSON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 162548-1 John F. Weaver, Chancellor ___________________________________

09/29/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 20, 2017 Session MICHAEL LEE GIVENS v. TRISTINE ANN GIVENS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 12D1733 W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge No. E2016-00865-COA-R3-CV M

Case: 22-20380 Document: 00516830549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, and upon reconsideration the Full Commission affirms in part and modifies in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms with modifications, the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Stanbac

*********** *Page 2 Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

377 S.C. 527 (2008) 660 S.E.2d 278 William R. SIMPSON, Jr., Appellant, v. Becky H. SIMPSON and Wade Ingle, Defendants, of whom Becky H. Simpson is Respondent. No. 4341. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted November 1, 2007. Decided February 8, 2008. Rehearing Denied April 28, 2008.

PER CURIAM. Appellants, who are members the Oglala Sioux Nation (Tribe), appeal the dismissal without prejudice of their claims against members of the Tribal government and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. After de novo review, this court agrees with the district court’s1 thorough, well-reasoned opinion dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. See Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-01047-COA SHANNON JANUARY CASE APPELLANT v. DANIEL JUSTIN CASE APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/31/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EDWARD E. PATTEN JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ADAMS COUNTY CHANCERY

SOUTHWICK, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Yvonne Lee was awarded damages in the amount of $500,000 after a jury trial on her complaint for personal injuries suffered in a fall in a Kmart store in Vicksburg. Kmart appeals, alleging that a video tape of surgical procedures should not have been played for the jury, and that Kmart’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial, or at least a remittit

USCA11 Case: 23-10385 Document: 112-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10385 ____________________ JANUARY LITTLEJOHN, JEFFREY LITTL

*799 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING COBB, Presiding Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is granted. The original opinion is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted therefor. ¶2. The Stephen D. Lee Foundation, a non-profit corporation, filed a complaint to confirm leasehold title of certain sixte

01/21/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 8, 2020 Session SAMUEL LEE BACHELOR JR. v. AJA MICHELE BACHELOR N/K/A AJA MICHELE BURRELL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004562-17 James F. Russell, Judge _________

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commi