Cases

This court, on March 12, 1999, affirmed the trial court's judgment, without an opinion. Ledford v. Engle, (No. 2971041) ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Civ.App. 1999) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court's judgment insofar as it affirmed the summary judgment on the claim relating *Page 996 to the validity of the agreements to compensate Engle, and the case has been remanded to this court. Ex parte Ledford, 7

[Cite as Head v. Head, 2024-Ohio-276.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY ANTHONY T. HEAD : : Appellant : C.A. No. 29846 : v. : Trial C

01/16/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 22, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ASHLEY LEDFORD AND BRANDON STEPP Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County Nos. 18180A, 18180B Ryan M. Spitzer, Judge ______________________________

123 F.Supp.2d 892 (2000) Yolanda COX, Janine Dalrymple, Marie Hogsed, Ora Mae Ledford, and Phyllis Stalcup, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INDIAN HEAD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; MGM Brakes, a division of Indian Head Industries, Inc.; and Franklin Barnett, Defendants. No. 2:98CV175-T. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Bryson City Division

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. When a prisoner filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after exhausting those remedies, the district court held t

605 F.3d 871 (2010) Jimmy LEDFORD, Larry O'Dell, Bryan Walker, Dynavision Group, LLC, Signature Leasing, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. Shelby PEEPLES, Jr., PFLC, LLC, Internal Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants. No. 06-10715. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 6, 2010. *875

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING In our original disposition of the appeal and cross-appeal in this federal securities fraud case, Ledford v. Peeples, 568 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir.2009), we affirmed the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims on summary judgment and reversed the court’s refusal to grant the defendants sanctions against plaintiffs’ attorneys under the Private

709 S.E.2d 239 (2011) LEDFORD v. The STATE. No. S10P1859. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 25, 2011. Reconsideration Denied April 12, 2011. *244 Jimmy Dodd Berry, Marietta, Carl P. Greenberg, Office of Georgia Capital Defender, Thomas McKee West, Atlanta, for appellant. Fred Andrew Lane, Jr., District Attor

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 No. 06-10715 JOHN LEY __________________

568 F.3d 1258 (2009) Jimmy LEDFORD, Larry O'Dell, Bryan Walker, Dynavision Group LLC, Signature Leasing, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. Shelby PEEPLES, Jr., PFLC, LLC, Internal Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants. No. 06-10715. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 22, 2009. *1262

Case: 19-11090 Date Filed: 09/15/2020 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11090 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:17-cv-00211-MHC MICHAEL WILLIAM LEDFORD,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 22, 2016 Session MELINDA DUNCAN, ET AL. v. CHERYL L. LEDFORD MD, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-11-8 Kyle Atkins, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02370-COA-R3-CV – Filed August 24, 2016

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In this case, two parties, X and Y, each owned a fifty percent interest in a limited liability company that manufactured and sold carpets. X provided the financing; Y ran the company and marketed its product. The parties had a buy-sell agreement that enabled either party to buy out the other at any time by offering to purchase the other’s interest in the company at a set price. After receiving an of

914 So.2d 1168 (2005) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Timothy Warren LEDFORD, Appellant. No. 40,318-KW. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 28, 2005. *1170 James E. Beal, Jonesboro, for Appellant. Walter E. May, Jr., District Attorney, Douglas L. Stokes, Jr., Robert A. Moore, Assistant District Attorneys,

03/03/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 15, 2016 Session CHARLES EDGAR LEDFORD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Monroe County No. 14-332 Sandra Donaghy, Judge ___________________________________

HULL, Circuit Judge: Petitioner J.W. Ledford, Jr., a Georgia death-row inmate, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, raising multiple challenges to his- capital conviction and death sentence. The district court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Led-ford’s claim that he is intellectually disabled and- not subject to execution.

STEPHENS, Judge. *268 Petitioner North Carolina Department of Public Safety ("DPS") appeals from the trial court's order affirming the Final Decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings ("OAH") by Senior Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") Fred G. Morrison, Jr., in favor of Respondent Chau

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 29, 2011 ROBERT B. LEDFORD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 276337 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2010-01773-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 4, 2011 The pro se petitioner, Robert B. Ledford, appeals the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s summary

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: Upon the majority vote of the judges in this Court in active service, on January 19, 2011, the en banc Court vacated this panel’s prior opinion and granted rehearing en bane. See Ledford v. Peeples, 630 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir.2011) (en banc); 605 F.3d 871 (11th Cir.2010), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 630 F.3d 134

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Ruben Dean Ledford on one count of being a convicted felon and armed career criminal in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). Mr. Ledford appeals his conviction, arguing that the district cou