Cases

242 S.W.3d 32 (2007) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Tiburcio LEDESMA, Jr., Respondent. No. 05-0895. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 14, 2007. Decided December 21, 2007. *35 Craig A. Morgan, Attorney At Law, Michael W. Eady and William Leonard Mennucci, Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P., Austi

CORRIGAN, J. Here we consider a question of California insurance law posed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: When a third party sues an employer for the negligent hiring, retention, and supervision of an employee who intentionally injured that third party, does the suit allege an "occurrence" under the employer's commercial general liability policy? (

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, PICTON, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brandon R. LEDESMA Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

ENGEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges the constitionality, on First Amendment and equal protection grounds, of the 1980 and 1981 amendments to the Food Stamp Act of 1977, 7 U.S.C. § 2011, et seq. The challenged amendments remove from eligibility for food stamps those persons engaged in labor strikes unless their households had been eligible to receive food stamps before the strike. I.</

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, M.K. JAMISON, M.G. MILLER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEREMIAH E. LEDESMA SERGEANT (E-5), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201400086 GENERAL C

47 Cal.Rptr.3d 326 (2006) 39 Cal.4th 641 140 P.3d 657 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Fermin Rodriguez LEDESMA, Defendant and Appellant. No. S014394. Supreme Court of California. August 17, 2006. *343 Donald M. Thommen, Visalia, and Jeffrey J. Stuetz, Wheat Ridge, under app

December 21, 2007 Mr. Michael W. Eady Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. 701 Brazos, Suite 1500 Austin Centre Austin, TX 78701 Mr. Andy Taylor Andy Taylor and Associates, P.C. 405 Main Street, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77002 RE: Case Number: 05-0895 Court of Appeals Number: 03-03-00634-CV Trial Court Number: 23,425 Style: FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. TIBURCIO LEDESMA, JR. Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129060 & (1

818 F.Supp. 983 (1993) Lupe LEDESMA as next friend for Sandra LEDESMA, a minor, Plaintiff, v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 7-92-079-K. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Wichita Falls Division. April 15, 1993. *984 Kenneth Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Wichita Falls, TX, for plaintiff.

825 F.2d 1046 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3409, 56 USLW 2101 Dorothy and Manuel LEDESMA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John BLOCK, Secretary of the United States Department ofAgriculture; Dr. John T. Dempsey, Director of MichiganState Department of Social Services; and Paul V. Henrikson,Director of the Michigan State Department of SocialServices, Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-1730.

OPINION Appellant pled guilty to the offense of keeping a gambling place. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. Sec. 47.04 (Vernon 1989). Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed his punishment at probation for ten years and a $5,000 fine. We affirm. In his first point of error, appellant contends the evidence is insufficient because his judicial confession differed from the allegations in the indictment. Appellant pled gui

OPINION DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: Martinez and Sidle, who was charged and tried under the name Stephens, were convicted under two counts of an indictment charging them and one Marie Dab-ney, jointly, with importing 117 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1), and with possession of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SALOMON LEDEZMA-COSINO, AKA No. 12-73289 Cocino Soloman Ledesma, Petitioner, Agency No. A091-723-478 v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges BEA and IKUTA join, concurring. The majority analyzes this case as if it involved governmental conduct in the domestic sphere, but it doesn’t. The President and Congress have excluded an alien pursuant to their plenary power over immigration. The Supreme Court “has firmly and repeatedly endorsed the proposition that Congress may make rules as to aliens th

804 F.2d 274 Joyce SUGGS and Ronnie Owen Faircloth, Appellants,v.Hon. Anthony M. BRANNON, in his official capacity asSuperior Court Judge, State of North Carolina; Ronald L.Stephens, in his official capacity as District Attorney forthe County of Durham, State of North Carolina; J.L.Packard, individually & in official capacity as policeofficer for the City of Durham, State of North Carolina;R.C. Evans, individua

496 F.Supp.2d 810 (2007) James ABNER, III, Adan Alamaguer Alaniz, Jason Baase, Richard Bauman, Anita Benavidez, Jerry Boose, Robert Brewer, Jr., La'Shaundria Carson, Francisco Castillo, Steven Clark, Jacob Coronado, Carl Delaney, Kris Doud, Sr., David Eudis, Jonathan Flora, Mary Franz, Judith Glesmer, James Hahn, L.C. Harris, Jr., Corneathia Harvey, Donald Hasse, Joshua Jekel, Brad Johnson, Mander Johnson, Jr., Viella Johnson, Dennis Jolin, Brad Kuznicki

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Douglas Ray .Hickman appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees, who denied Hickman a concealed weapons permit. He complains, among other things, that the appellees’ permit issuance policy violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms. We have jurisdiction over his timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1291, and affirm on the basis that Hickman lack

52 Cal.App.4th 820 (1997) MATTCO FORGE, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent; MATEO MINGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. B087488. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. February 7, 1997. *824 COUNSEL Greines, Martin, Stein & Ri

J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-00244-CV ____________ BROWN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. f/k/a SURGEON’S MANAGEMENT, INC., and BHCF, LLC a/k/a BHCF, INC., Appellants V.