Cases

*727 DE MUNIZ, J. In these two criminal cases consolidated for purposes of opinion, each defendant’s conviction was based, for the most part, on eyewitness identification evidence. In State v. Lawson, 239 Or App 363, 244 P3d 860 (2010), t

BENTON, Judge. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. (Winn Dixie) and Crawford & Company appeal a compensation order insofar as it awards Ricardo La Torre temporary partial disability benefits (making no allowance for any offsets), and (prospectively) authorizes Dr. Lazaro Guerra to provide orthopedic care, including ordering additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We affirm both the award of medical benefits and the award of te

CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK AND LENDER ASSET RECOVERY, INC., AND DON LAWSON V. ALLEN RAE INVESTMENTS, INC. RUTH NARRAMORE, RUTH ANN TAYLOR, AND ERIKA TAYLOR COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-095-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-095-CV CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK AND APPELLANTS LENDER ASSET

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Circ. 10/03/2024 Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 501 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-22-648 KIMBRA DOLAN Opinion Delivered October 23, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

[Cite as Stalloy Metals, Inc. v. Kennametal, Inc., 2014-Ohio-4134.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO STALLOY METALS, INC., : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2013-G-3151 - vs -

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ' A VERY BRIEF INTRODUCTION These patent infringement cases, involving seemingly uncomplicated plastic couplers, have now spanned ten years, generated 17 written opinions, scores of substantive orders, two trials, and a contempt hearing.1 The docket e

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1153THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendants JWS's and KPK's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed June 17, 2016 (Doc. 39)("MSJ"); and (ii) the Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants' Exemption Defense, filed June 17, 2016 (Doc. 4

[Cite as Cage v. Sutherland Bldg. Prods., Inc., 2014-Ohio-3891.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Vickie K. Cage, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 14AP-227 v. : (C.P.C. No. 12 CVO 15799) Sutherland Buildi

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“C

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

404 B.R. 593 (2009) In re ACCESS CARDIOSYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Access Cardiosystems, Inc., North American Enterprises, Inc., John Moriarty and Associates, John J. Moriarty, Richard F. Connolly, Jr., and Joseph R. Zimmell, Plaintiffs, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Access Cardiosystems, Inc., *594 Plaintiffs-Intervenors,[1] v. Randall Fincke, Defendant. Bank

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. ) Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 8885-VCL OPINION Date Submitted: March 4, 2015 Date Decided: May 20, 2015 Date Revised: May 21, 2015 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Jessica Zeld

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Anthony Pacchia (the “Lead Plaintiff’) and his attorneys (“Lead Counsel”) challenged a transaction in which Vivendi S.A. divested its controlling equity position in Activision Blizzard,. Inc. (“Activision” or the “Company”). The transaction restructured Activision’s governance profile and stockholder base, so this decisio

35 So.3d 215 (2010) Vera M. RAINEY v. ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC., and Mike Case. No. 2009-C-572. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 16, 2010. Rehearing Denied May 7, 2010. *217 Beall & Thies, LLC, William Walter Thies, Russell W. Beall, and Leonard Cardenas, III, Baton Rouge, for Applicant. Flanagan Part

730 F.Supp.2d 783 (2010) Michael SMITH, Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Defendant. No. 3-09-0139. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. August 9, 2010. *786 Blake H. Frye, Douglas R. Kertscher, Hill, Kertscher & Pixley, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Wade Bonham Cowan, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff. Aviva

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. Caffe Ribs, Inc. appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict awarding $4,914,480 in this eminent domain proceeding for the State’s whole taking of a 7.5214-acre parcel of land and improvements (the “property”). Caffe Ribs challenges the trial court’s evidentiary rulings in four issues. We affirm.