Cases

881 P.2d 489 (1994) 77 Hawai`i 2 FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAI`I, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frederick D. LAWRENCE, Sr., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Frederick D. Lawrence, Jr.; Carolyn A. Lawrence; Frederick D. Lawrence, Jr., Minor; Christopher T.F.K. Smith, Sr., Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Christopher T.F.K. Smith, Jr.; Mary A.L. Smith; Cyd L. Smith, Individually and

416 N.W.2d 154 (1987) WALKER AND COMPANY, LTD., Respondent, v. Vincent J. LAWRENCE, Appellant. No. C9-87-1333. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 8, 1987. Review Denied February 12, 1988. *155 Bruce P. Grostephan, Peterson, Engberg & Peterson, Minneapolis, for respondent. Dale M. Wagner, Maher J.

56 F.3d 71NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Delores KELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.H. Lawrence GARRETT, Secretary of Navy, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56556. United

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Thomas Jefferson Gordon (Gordon) and Larry Lawrence Johnson (Johnson) were convicted for distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. They appeal

Benham, Chief Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent to the majority’s reversal of the trial court’s decision to deny appellant’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment and grant appellee’s Petition for Divorce and custody of the couple’s minor child. The “clean hands doctrine” requires that appellant’s conduct be considered before deciding the issues of law and equity now before this Court. This is a divorce and cu

332 F.Supp.2d 587 (2004) Warren HELLER and Ralph Silver, Plaintiffs v. STARWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., WHLP Acquisition LLC, Westin Realty Corp., Theodore W. Darnall, and Alan M. Schnaid, Defendants No. 03 CIV. 9151(SCR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 6, 2004. Lawrence P. Kolker, Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz, L.L.P.

277 F.2d 739 Burton N. PUGACH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Honorable Isidore DOLLINGER, District Attorney of BronxCounty, and Honorable Stephen P. Kennedy, PoliceCommissioner of the City of New York,Respondents-Appellees.John O'ROURKE, Joseph De Grandis, Frank De Forte, ErnestZundel, Herbert Jacob, Eugene Jacob, Lawrence Gallo, JosephGallo, Norman J. Clark, Jr., Charles De Forte, AnthonyPafumi, also known as Angelo Pa

ANALYSIS Remaining Plaintiffs As explained above, the Third Amended Complaint initially listed 76 named Plaintiffs, but through a series of voluntary dismissals, the number was eventually reduced to 57. (See ECF Nos. 69, 81, 83-85, & 141.) And, as also explained above, only those Plaintiffs who opted out of the Jabbari settlement can proceed in this c

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge. Andró Tolentino appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in fa-. vor of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. and Westin Hotel Management L.P. (collectively, “Respondents”). Tolen-tino filed suit pursuant to the Missouri Minimum Wage Law (MMWL), section 290.500 1 et seq.,

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE Kimberly Wilson appeals from the judgment in favor of the defendant, KAL Motel, Inc., following a jury trial on her negligence claim against the motel. In her sole point on appeal, she contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the proper standard of care. The judgment is affirmed. Wilson filed a negligence suit against KAL Motel alleging that while an invitee spen

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $10,000. Plaintiff brought this action to recover a $10,000 down payment he had paid defendant toward the purchase of a house. On April 4, 2004, plaintiff had obtained a loan approval letter from IndyMac Bank, which was valid

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RESERVING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION PENDING A SUMMARY TRIAL Clark Waddoups, United' States District Judge Sixty-seven plaintiffs1 have sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) for engaging in various unauthorized and fraudulent activities using them p

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Presiding Judge. Plaintiff, Kevin Cooper, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Chrysler Group, LLC, in his negligence action to recover damages for injuries suffered in a workplace slip and fall. The trial court entered summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs exclusive remedy for damages caused by injuries arising from a slip and fall on his employer’s premises was wit

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

(2008) Kenneth J. WOLF and KJW, LLC, Petitioners, v. Ford KENNELLY, Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC, and Lawrence Spain, Respondents. No. 07 C 2218. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 12, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge. Ford Kennelly claims that he lost more tha

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Phonometrics, Inc. appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting-in-part and denying-in-part the motion of Westin Hotel Co. for attorney fees and costs. Phonometrics, Inc. v. Westin Hotel Co., No. 94-6504-CIV-RYSKA

723 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2010) COSMETIC WARRIORS LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. Glenn ABRAHAMSON d/b/a One Bath and Body, Wink Bath and Body, LLC, Target Corporation, and John Doe Entities 2 through 5, Defendants. Civ. No. 10-938 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 8, 2010. *1103 John A. Clifford, Rachel K. Zimmerman,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-986L (Filed: March 9, 2018) ) Keywords: Rails-to-Trails; Fifth MICHAEL A. AND TINA C. BRATCHER, et ) Amendment Takings Clause; Uniform al., ) Relocation Assistance and Real Property )

OPINION STARK, District Judge: In July 2011, the Court held a four-day bench trial in this patent infringement action brought pursuant to the Hatch-Wax-man Act. The case arises from Defendant’s efforts to bring to market a generic version of Plaintiffs’ Oracea® drug product, a once-daily 40 milligram (mg) administration of doxycycline indicated for the treatment of acne rosacea. Plaintiffs asse