Cases

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Fee (“plaintiff’) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to a period of Social Security disability and disabi

676 F.3d 1203 (2012) Jennie P. BELTRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-56255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted October 8, 2010.[*] Filed May 2, 2012. *1204 Lawrence David Rohlfing, Law Offices

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER JEAN ROSENBLUTH, United States Magistrate Judge. I.PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Social Security Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties consented to' the jurisdiction of the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This matter i

814 F.Supp.2d 957 (2011) Emilio A. CHAPA, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CV 09-4614-E. United States District Court, C.D. California. April 25, 2011. *958 Young Chul Cho, Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff. Assistant U.S.

ORDER TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [DE 14, 21]. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion [DE 14] is GRANTED, Defendant’s Motion [DE 21] is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for an award of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth below, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is REVERSED and REMANDED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HI

764 F.Supp.2d 381 (2010) Grace CORNELL, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 6:08-CV-1021 (LEK/DEP). United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 23, 2010. *383 Antonowicz Law Office, Of Counsel: Peter W. Antonowicz, Esq., Rome, NY, for Plaintiff. Richard S. Hartunian, U

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES B. DAY, United States Magistrate Judge. Mary E. Kendall, (“Plaintiff’) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs claim for a period of Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Plaintiff, Lawrence G. Denhoff, filed a Complaint in this Court on October 28, 2011, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny his claim for disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. This Court may review a final decision by the Commissioner. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. Plaintiff seeks review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter Commissioner) denying disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) under sections 216®, 223, 1602, and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416®, 423, 1381a, and 1382c(a)(3)(A) (hereinafter the Act). Finding erro

782 F.Supp.2d 696 (2011) Becky E.S. GAINES, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Cause No. 1:09-cv-1405-WTL-TAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 9, 2011. *697 J. Frank Hanley, II, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Thomas E. K

650 F.3d 772 (2011) Kevin M. JONES, Appellant v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee. No. 09-5192. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 12, 2011. Decided July 8, 2011. Micah W.J. Smith, appointed by the court, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of appellant. With him on the brief

781 F.Supp.2d 790 (2011) Stacy A. STAGGS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Cause No. 1:09-cv-1519-WTL-TAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. February 10, 2011. *792 Patrick Harold Mulvany, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Thomas

798 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2011) Clifford A. ASHING, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. CV 09-09343 RZ. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 2011. *1144 Young Chul Cho, Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff. Assistant U.S. Att

DECISION and ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, District Judge. This matter brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. No objections to the June 1, 2012 Re-poi't-Recommendation have be

792 F.Supp.2d 886 (2011) Harry PARKER III, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:10-CV-68-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. June 9, 2011. *888 Lawrence Wittenberg, Roberti, Wittenberg, Lauffer & Wicker, P.A., Durham, NC, for Plaintiff.

647 F.3d 350 (2011) Melvin A. JONES, Appellant v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee. No. 09-5414. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 4, 2011. Decided August 5, 2011. *352 Jonathan K. Osborne, student counsel, argued the cause as amicus curiae in s

780 F.Supp.2d 1195 (2011) Brian PECKHAM, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-2142-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 3, 2011. *1196 Nicholas D. Purifoy, Western Professional Assoc. Inc., Lawrence, KS, for Plaintiff. David D. Zimmerman, Office

827 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2011) Tracy JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 10-24131-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 19, 2011. *1339 Adam Scott Neidenberg, Adam Neidenberg, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Lawrence Nathan Rosen, United States A

748 F.Supp.2d 160 (2010) Marc W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 1:06-CV-1226 (LEK). United States District Court, N.D. New York. October 26, 2010. *162 Kristie Halloran Hanson, Hanson Law Firm, Schenectady, NY, for Plaintiff. Maria P. Fragassi Santangelo, Social Se