⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lawrence Dyson”

State v. Dysonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015-08-06 · Published · cited 14× · 189 Wash. App. 215; 360 P.3d 25
¶31 Korsmo, J. (dissenting) — I agree with nearly all of the majority opinion except for its conclusion. The issue identified here is not a mandatory minimum sentence problem. Alleyne v. United States,_U.S._, 133 S. Ct. 2151, 186 L. Ed. 2d 314 (2013). The actual issue is one of statutory interpretation that has already been settled by In re Personal Restraint of Huy Khac Tran, 154 Wn.2d 323, 111 P
Dyson v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005-07-13 · Published · cited 0× · 163 Md. App. 363; 878 A.2d 711; 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 100
DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. A jury in the Circuit Court for Howard County convicted Lawrence Lambert Dyson, Jr., the appellant, on one count of felony theft scheme of property valued over $500 and on three counts of misdemeanor theft of property valued at less than *367$500. The court sentenced the appellant to a 10-year term for the felony theft scheme conviction and to 18-
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-06-14 · Published · cited 12× · 951 F. Supp. 2d 1009; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83800; 2013 WL 2936453
MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.’s (Dyson) motion for partial summary judgment. This matter is also before the court on Defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc.’s (Bissell) motion to exclude the expert report of Ran Kivetz (Kivetz), Bissell’s motion to disqualify Susan Goldsmith (Goldsmith) from serving as an expert, an
Auer v. Dysonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 7185
Auer v Dyson (2019 NY Slip Op 07185) Auer v Dyson 2019 NY Slip Op 07185 Decided on October 4, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015-08-27 · Published · cited 6× · 308 F.R.D. 510; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113509; 2015 WL 5062265
ORDER ROBERT L. PITMAN, District Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Certification of a Collective Action and Authorization for Notice, filed July 6, 2015 (Clerk’s Dkt. # 15) and the responsive pleadings thereto. After reviewing the parties’ pleadings, relevant case law, as well as the entire case file, the Court issues the following order. I. BACKG
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 69× · 859 F.3d 1; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10258; 130 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 241; 2017 WL 2485304
MILLETT, Circuit Judge: Before federal employees can bring a claim of employment discrimination to court, they must first present the claim to their employing agency so that the agency can attempt to resolve the matter internally. While Lawrence Niskey initiated this administrative exhaustion process for his claims of race discrimination and retaliation, he did not see it through
State v. Lawrencepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010-03-03 · Published · cited 9× · 32 So. 3d 329; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 278; 2010 WL 715540
32 So.3d 329 (2010) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Terrance LAWRENCE, Appellant. No. 45,061-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. March 3, 2010. *332 Louisiana Appellate Project, by Paula C. Marx, for Appellant. Jonathan M. Stewart, District Attorney, H. Russell Davis, Kenneth P. Haines, Tammy Lenn Gantt Jump,
Dyson v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 646 So. 2d 849; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12591; 1994 WL 715026
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Lawrence v. State, 614 So.2d 1092 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 107, 126 L.Ed.2d 73 (1993); Bonham v. State, 450 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
United States Customs Court · 1959-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 42 Cust. Ct. 559
Lawrence, Judge: When the above-enumerated appeals for a reap-praisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court. Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that — ' The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation,
Willmott v. Dysonpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1984-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 123 Misc. 2d 1002; 474 N.Y.S.2d 1018; 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3122
OPINION OF THE COURT Vincent R. Balletta, J. This is an action commenced by the plaintiff on his own behalf and purportedly on behalf of all other residential ratepayers of the Long Island Lighting Company. He brings the action against John F. Dyson, the Chairman of the Power Authority of the State of New York, the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY), Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), an
Auer v. Dysonpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1984-05-08 · Published · cited 5× · 125 Misc. 2d 274; 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3402; 479 N.Y.S.2d 102
OPINION OF THE COURT John R. Tenney, J. Plaintiffs, Senator Martin S. Auer and Lawrence Sloane, have brought a motion to enforce a prior judgment of this court from a declaratory judgment action. (Auer v Dyson, 110 Misc 2d 943.) That action addressed the validity of two Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) bond resolutions which pledged all PASNY revenues from all of its projects. Plai
Auer v. Dysonpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1981-11-04 · Published · cited 5× · 110 Misc. 2d 943; 444 N.Y.S.2d 513; 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3191
OPINION OF THE COURT John R. Tenney, J. The plaintiffs, Martin S. Auer and Lawrence Sloane, bring this action against the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) and the Chase Manhattan Bank. They act in their capacity as residential consumers of electricity supplied by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, which purchases electricity from PASNY. The Power Authority of the Stat
In Re Kablerpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999-05-25 · Published · cited 4× · 230 B.R. 525
230 B.R. 525 (1999) In re Christopher Lawrence KABLER, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 99-00049-5-ATS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division. February 18, 1999. Michael Ryan Dyson, Layton, Dyson & Carraway, P.A., Raleigh, NC, for Debtor. Pamela P. Keenan, Kirschbaum, Nanney, Brown & Keenan, P.A., Raleigh, NC, for Ford Motor Credit Co.</
Koch v. Dysonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982-03-23 · Published · cited 11× · 85 A.D.2d 346; 448 N.Y.S.2d 698; 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14981
OPINION OF THE COURT Mollen, P. J. In these original proceedings pursuant to section 148 of the Public Service Law, petitioners challenge a determination of the New York State Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment (Siting Board), which authorized the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) to construct a 700 megawatt fossil fueled power plant at Arthur Kill near Travis, Staten Is
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 29 C.C.P.A. 148; 1941 CCPA LEXIS 159
Lenroot, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal brings before us for review a judgment of the United States Customs Court (Second Division) sustaining four protests by appellees against the classification by the collector at the port of New York of certain so-called dental operating pump chairs under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as articles in chief value of metal, .at the rate of
United States Customs Court · 1941-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 6 Cust. Ct. 185; 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 45
Dallingee, Judge: These are suits against the United States, arising at the port of New York, brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on particular importations of so-called dental operating pump chairs. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as manufactures of metal not specially provided for. It is claimed that said
District Court, D. Maryland · 2000-10-23 · Published · cited 2× · 118 F. Supp. 2d 668; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16386; 2000 WL 1637755
118 F.Supp.2d 668 (2000) BERKELEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEE, et. al., Defendant. Civil Action No. AW-98-414. United States District Court, D. Maryland. October 23, 2000. *669 Richard I. Chaifetz, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia, MA, Sherman L. Cohn, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Thomas M
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 27 C.C.P.A. 260; 1940 CCPA LEXIS 9
Bland, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The appellee in 1936 imported from Japan what it terms a “Dental Operating Pump Chair,” invoiced as “1 set Iziri Dental Operating Bump Chair Model ‘K?, Mahogany Duco Finish,” which the Collector of Customs at the port of New York classified as a manufacture of metal under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 53 A.D.2d 720; 384 N.Y.S.2d 54; 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13490
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets which suspended petitioner’s license as a milk distributor under subdivision (j) of section 258-c of the Agriculture and Markets Law. Subdivision (j) of section 258-c of the Agriculture and Markets Law provides that a milk dealer’s license may be su
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 576 So. 2d 222; 1991 Ala. LEXIS 194; 1991 WL 37581
This is an appeal from a judgment upholding certain inter vivos conveyances of J. Cecil Hoppes in an action brought by Lawrence Edwin Hoppes, as the executor of the estate of J. Cecil Hoppes. J. Cecil Hoppes died on December 13, 1986, and his will was admitted to probate in Baldwin County, Alabama. In his will, *Page 223 the decedent divided all of his property, both real and personal, among his four children, the appellees here. Aft