Cases

377 F.Supp. 524 (1974) In-Cho CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence PARK, Individually and as President of Mansfield State College, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 73-371. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. June 21, 1974. *525 Martin M. Fine, Williamsport, Pa., for plaintiff. Robert Nagel, Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg

369 F.Supp. 959 (1974) In-Cho CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence PARK, Individually and as President of Mansfield State College, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 73-371. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. January 30, 1974. As Amended February 27, 1974. *960 Martin M. Fine, Williamsport, Pa., for plaintiff.<

Respondent obtained a verdict for malpractice against appellants who contend here that the trial court prejudicially erred in both the rendition and form of an instruction on res ipsa loquitur. Since the application of the doctrine must intimately relate to the facts, we review the clinical history of the case and the expert testimony as to the involved medical procedures. We shall test the applicable cases against these facts. Finally, we analyze the form of the instruction. Our revi

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This ease presents the question whether the defendants’ second prosecution was permissible under the double jeopardy clause after the court on its own motion declared a mistrial during their first trial. The defendants-appellants, Kin Ping Cheung and Sammy Cho, were convicted of importing heroin into the Unite

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. This appeal arises from two actions for judicial review filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. In each case, William Pumphrey, on behalf of the Robert A. Pumphrey Funeral Home, and RAP Leasing Corporation (“RAP”) (collectively “Pumphrey”), the appellees, were the petitioners. In the first action for j

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. The principal issue on this appeal is whether Dr. In-Cho Chung,. a professor at Mansfield State College, was denied procedural due process when his employment was terminated (1) without his being afforded a hearing prior to the decision by the administration that termi

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 67) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This litigation involves a contract dispute between Beco Dairy Inc. (“BECO”) and Global Tech Systems, Inc. (“GTS”) concerning the development and licensing of dairy technology. II. PROCEDURAL

*1082MEMORANDUM OPINION • AND ORDER DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK, United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl E. Rose (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits ..(“DIB”). For the reasons discussed, below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER JEAN ROSENBLUTH, United States Magistrate Judge. I.PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Social Security Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties consented to' the jurisdiction of the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This matter i

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge Every ten years, the Census Bureau takes on the herculean task of counting the entire population of the United States. The Census Bureau expends considerable resources on this task, presumably to ensure that the count is as accurate as possible because an accurate count is essential to ensure, among other things, equal representation-a hallmark of our Constitution. As the 2020 Census app

439 F.Supp.2d 1032 (2006) Aimee GRUNSEICH v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration No. CV 03-6120 RC. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 8, 2006. *1033 Young Cho, attorney-at-law with the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, for Plaintiff. Cedina M. Kim, Assi

Re: Dkt. No. 35 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Plaintiffs April Lax et al. filed a class action on March 31, 2014, asserting claims against defendants Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. (TMS). The allegations in the Complaint center on defendants’ alleged failure to disclose to c

814 F.Supp.2d 957 (2011) Emilio A. CHAPA, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CV 09-4614-E. United States District Court, C.D. California. April 25, 2011. *958 Young Chul Cho, Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff. Assistant U.S.

798 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2011) Clifford A. ASHING, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. CV 09-09343 RZ. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 2011. *1144 Young Chul Cho, Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff. Assistant U.S. Att

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. TURK, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Ponani Sukumar (“Sukumar”) and Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates, Inc. (“SCSRA”)’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 80). Defendant Nautilus, Inc. (“Nautilus”) filed an Opposition (ECF No. 89), to which the Plaintiffs replied (ECF No. 91). The parties were heard on D

Filed 6/1/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ALEKSANDR KON, B290929 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC583851) v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los A

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Emmanuel Ormand Neil appeals his conviction for sexual contact with a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(3) (1994). Neil is a citizen of St. Vincent and the Grenadines who was employed on a cruise ship departing from and returning to an American port. The victim, a 12-year-old girl, was a United States citizen, and the crime took place

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’MOTION TO DISMISS SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is Defendants Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”) and Toyota Motor Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Mui Ho, Shelda Anglin, and Ted Flory’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Class Action C

*1174 OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: Richard Kennedy appeals an order of the district court affirming the decision to deny him supplemental security income benefits. He argues that he equals the listed impairment for intellectual disability because his physical impairments are

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge *396In these related cases, Plaintiffs challenged Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. Plaintiffs claimed the decision was arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), unconstitutional in violation of the Constitution's Enumeration