Cases

361 S.C. 94 (2004) 603 S.E.2d 587 E'Van FRAZIER, Respondent, v. Athaniel BADGER, Jr., Petitioner. No. 25876. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard January 6, 2004. Decided September 27, 2004. *98 Andrea E. White, of Duff, Turner, White and Boykin, LLC, and Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson

McCLENDON, J. In this suit on a promissory note, the third-party defendant appeals the trial court judgment in favor of the third-party plaintiff for the amount due on the note. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. *480FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This litigation arises out of a dispute betw

PER CURIAM. James Jefferson, Roosevelt Roberts, and Barbara Steadmon are three of 16 plaintiffs who filed suit under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 344.010-344.990, against the Ford Motor Company, against Local 862 of the International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), and against Kenny Yates, the building chairman of Local 862 at Ford’s Louisville

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00896-COA RECARDO FRAZIER A/K/A RECARDO APPELLANT RANDELL FRAZIER A/K/A RICARDO FRAZIER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/12/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES E. WEBSTER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

People v Frazier (2022 NY Slip Op 07449) People v Frazier 2022 NY Slip Op 07449 Decided on December 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

[Cite as State v. Frazier, 2015-Ohio-3116.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-140369 TRIAL NO. B-1208535 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. BYRON FRAZIER,

Hoover, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, William A. Smith ("Smith"), appeals the judgment of the Meigs County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of contempt and sentencing him to 30 days in jail and a $250 fine, plus court costs. In this case, the appellant, William A. Smith, is not the original defendant, Forrest Frazier. Smith was the alleged victim in the case against Frazier. In the proceedings against Frazier, Smith failed to appear p

LOLLEY, J. |, Martonius Frazier was charged by bill of information in August 2012 with armed robbery, a violation of La. R.S. 14:64. He subsequently pled guilty and was sentenced to 20 years at hard labor, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. After Frazier’s motion to reconsider sentence was denied, this appeal ensued. Frazier’s appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, together with a brief

417 F.3d 1230 James A. FRAZIER and Mantis Wildlife Films, Pty. Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants, andPanavision, Inc., Plaintiff,v.ROESSEL CINE PHOTO TECH, INC., Roessel CPT Rentals, Inc., and P+S Technik GmbH Feinmechanik, Defendants-Cross Appellants. No. 04-1060. No. 04-1092. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 2, 2005

04/03/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 29, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMAR LAQUINN FRAZIER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 99921 G. Scott Green, Judge No. E2023-00887-CCA-R3-CD The Defend

348 S.W.3d 132 (2011) Otis C. FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 95973. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. September 13, 2011. Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Timothy A. Blackwell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge: Arthur Frazier’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the state’s Commissioner of Corrections and three correction officers was dismissed under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. On a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6), the factual allegations in the complaint must be accepted as true, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the plaintiff.

Swan, Associate Justice, dissenting. Appellant, Rena Brodhurst, asserts that the trial court erred when it granted Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment upholding a claim for recognition of an easement across her property which provides access to Appellee’s property. Brodhurst further asserts that there were outstanding issues of material fact concerning the existence of the alleged easement; therefore, she

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term _____________________ FILED November 12, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 19-0484 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK _

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2025 Term FILED May 20, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 23-184 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

566 P.2d 1023 (1977) Gregory Allen FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. 2921. Supreme Court of Alaska. July 22, 1977. Lawrence J. Kulik, Anchorage, for appellant. Glen C. Anderson, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Joseph D. Balfe, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee. Before BOOCHEVER, C.J., RABINOWITZ, CONNOR

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 255 KA 13-01868 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE M. BRADFORD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CINDY F. INTSCHERT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERTOWN (NICOLE L. KYLE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

271 P.3d 280 (2012) 166 Wn. App. 378 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Lewis Adam LAWRENCE, Appellant. No. 29055-7-111. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. February 2, 2012. *281 Marie Jean Trombley, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, Thomas C. Sand, Portland, OR, for Appellant. Denis Paul Trac

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant (Gregory Brannon) on the 10th of May 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

245 S.W.3d 757 (2008) MORSEY, INC., Appellant, v. Cynthia FRAZIER, Widow of Daniel Frazier, Deceased; Hon. Irene Steen, Administrative Law Judge; Kentucky Workers' Compensation Board, Appellees. No. 2007-SC-000159-WC. Supreme Court of Kentucky. February 21, 2008. *758 Richard Christion Hutson, Whitlow, Roberts, Houston & Stau