Cases

Appellants, hereinafter designated as the Securities Commission, have appealed from a judgment of the lower court setting aside an order of the Commission canceling the registration of respondents as a dealer in securities. After notice and hearing the Securities Commission canceled the license of Lauren W. Gibbs, Incorporated, as such dealer, pursuant to 82-1-21, R.S.U. 1933. Thereafter the Lauren W. Gibbs corporation commenced an action in the district court pursuant to 82-1-41, R.S.U. 1933

816 F.Supp.2d 798 (2011) Frederick SCHIFF, Plaintiff, v. The CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant. No. C 08-4627 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 8, 2011. *803 Thomas Kevin Bourke, Law Office of Thomas K. Bourke, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. Lauren Marie Monson, San Francisco

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FOR SANCTIONS (Docket Nos. 57, 63, 65, 67, 72, 100) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff in this matter brings suit against á variety of defendants alleging various causes of action that appear to largely stem from her unsuccessf

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-11 Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CA-002559-000-1-XX _____________________________ ISLAND ROOFING and RESTORATION, LLC, a/a/o JAMES ROCCO and NICOLE ROCCO, Appellants, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARA

2014 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2402 COMPLETE TITLE: Hailey Marie-Joe Force, a/k/a Hailey Marie-Joe Dziewa, a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Joseph J. Welcenbach, Plaintiff-Appellant, The Estate of Billy Joe Force, by its Special

PATRICIA ANNE JONES * NO. 2024-CA-0520 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ETI, INC., WHEELER TILE * CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOURTH CIRCUIT PRECISION SHORING, LLC, * ROSS CONSTRUCTION & STATE OF LOUISIANA REMODELING, LLC ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOL

579 F.3d 969 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of WASHINGTON; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Lummi Nation; Upper Skagit Indian Tribe; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation; Tulalip Tribes; Port Gamble S'Klallam Indian Tribe; Jamestown S'Klallam Indian Tribe, Defendants-Appellees, v. Samish Indian Tribe, Movant-Appellant. No. 08-35794. United S

799 F.Supp. 1052 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, in its own right and on Behalf of Torres-Martinez Band of Mission Indians and the Allottees therein, Plaintiffs, v. The IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a Public Irrigation District; and Coachella Valley Water District, a Public Irrigation District, Defendant. Civ. No. 82-1790-K(M). United States District Court, S.D. California. Ju

MEMORANDUM ** This case is remanded to the district court. A 12(b)(6) dismissal is not appropriate. The district court failed to make any determination on whether it has continuing jurisdiction and on what ground. The jurisdictional basis is not self-evident; it is necessarily linked to the nature of the claim being asserted. The issues and proceedings are complex and meaningful appellate review requires a m

EBEL, Circuit Judge. We have consolidated the present appeals for purposes of disposition. These appeals arise out of a police shooting in a rural area of American Fork, Utah, and the subsequent detention of witnesses to the shooting. The plaintiffs include Debbie Walker, mother and personal representative of the estate of David Walker who died in the shooting, and various other relatives of David Walker who have asserted cl

JEFFREY FARSHAD * NO. 2026-C-0149 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS * AT LLOYD'S, LONDON FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Fany Jackeline Ramirez-Mejia’s removal order was reinstated following her illegal reentry into the United States. The Board of Immigration Appeals ruled she may not apply for asylum and is ineligible for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture. We agree and DENY the petition for review.

2024 IL App (2d) 230173 No. 2-23-0173 Opinion filed May 30, 2024 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF 1, PLAINTIFF 2, an

ACCEPTED 15-24-00116-CV August 25, 2025 FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT Environmental Division Docket No. 138-12-18 Vtec 32 Cherry St, 2nd Floor, Suite 303, Docket No. 30-2-19 Vtec Burlington, VT 05401 802-951-1740 www.vermontjudiciary.org Killington Mountain House, LLC NOV ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Title: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Motio

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions came on for hearing before the court on February 15, 2012. Plaintiffs Alfred Lam, Frank Chen, Gregory Chin, and Paula Leiato appeared through their counsel, Dow Patten and Spencer Smith. Defendant City and County of Sa

2022 IL 126856 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126856) LARRY E. SCHULTZ, Special Administrator of the Estate of Laurene T. Schultz, Deceased, Appellant, v. ST. CLAIR COUNTY et al., Appellees. Opinion filed A

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Princeton Vanguard, LLC (“Princeton Vanguard”) appeals from the final decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) cancelling its registration of the mark PRETZEL CRISPS for pretzel crackers on the Supplemental Register and denying its application to register PRETZEL CRISPS on the Principal Register. Frito-Lay N. Am., Inc. v. Prin

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER C. LYNWOOD SMITH JR., District Judge. Plaintiff, John Wesley Burch, who is proceeding pro se, filed this case on September 7, 2010.1 His amended complaint asserts claims for alleged violations of rights guaranteed by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution against the City of Florence, Alabama (“Ci

451 F.3d 1139 David WALKER, for himself and as next best friend for Cadin Wayne Walker, McKaela Tandi Walker and Andrew Walker; Debbie Walker, for herself, as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Walker, as next best friend for Cadin Wayne Walker, McKaela Tandi Walker and Andrew Walker; Patti Walker Stratton; Chad Stratton; Tyree Lamph, individually, and for and on behalf of Dakota ("Cody") Lamph; Amy Melissa Lamph, individually, and for