Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. Plaintiffs Joanne Harris and Jessica Duff, an unmarried same-sex couple living in the Western District of Virginia, and Christy Berghoff and Victoria Kidd, a same-sex couple married under the laws of the District of Columbia and also living in the Western District of Virginia, brought this action against defendants Robert F. McDonnell, in

988 S.W.2d 423 (1999) HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Texas Department of Transportation, and Brazoria Drainage District No. 4, Appellants, v. Doyle ADAM, Wanda Adam, Patricia Ann Adams, Fernando R. Aguilar, Carolyn S. Aguilar, Charles Aiken, Julieann Aiken, Ronald E. Alford, Joann Alford, Kenneth Allen, Monzelle Allen, Antonio Almaguer, Linda Almaguer, Jose A. Alvarez, Derward L. Amacker, Donna R. Amacker, Rodolfo Aparicio, Dianna Aparicio

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Introduction... 1057 I.Findings of Fact... 1060 A. Procedural Background... 1060 B. The Evidence in the Record... 1061 1. The Parties... 1062 2. Th

Opinion issued April 10, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-01058-CV ——————————— JOANN BATEY, Appellant V. PAUL DROLUK, INTERCONTINENTAL BEARING SUPPLY COMPANY,

ACCEPTED 06-14-00086-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/20/2015 5:03:42 PM

ACCEPTED 06-14-00086-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/2/2015 5:20:51 PM

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION Appellate case name: Rafael Ortega, Rosara Investments, LLC,. LMMM Houston #50 Ltd., and SOGA Investments, Ltd. v. Amin Abel, Mohamad Mustafa, Saeed Abdel Fatah, Ihab Aboushi, Hanna Hinnawi, Sameera Abel, Amy Latif, Joann Bargh

James C. Cissell, Judge. {¶ 1} This matter came on to be heard on April 28, 2003, on the complaint of Fifth Third Bank, as trustee of the Laura S. Lawwill Irrevocable Living Trust, for instructions and declaratory relief regarding the interpretation of the living trust agreement. Present were counsel for the trustee; counsel for Lisa Roland (surviving spouse of Richard Lawwill) and Ashley and Richard Lawwill Jr. (children of R

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OPINION JUSTICE BAER We granted review to consider the application of Pennsylvania's business records exception to the rule against hearsay, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 803(6) and the Uniform Business Records

PER CURIAM. For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), 766 So.2d 501, regarding La.R.S. 14:89(A)(2), the ruling of the district court is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Opinion issued August 23, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00415-CV ——————————— RAFAEL ORTEGA, ROSARA INVESTMENTS, LLC, LMMM HOUSTON #50 LTD., AND SOGA INVESTMENTS, LTD., Appellants V. AMIN ABEL, MOHAMAD MU

HARRIS, Justice. Withdrawal of counsel can wreak havoc on the orderly processing of cases in a busy trial court, and it seems that a withdrawal is most likely to occur in civil eases where extremely complicated litigation is also unpromising for one side or the other. Retaining counsel on a continuing basis in such a suit is often problematic and frustrating to a litigant. It can also be frustrating to a trial judge, hard pres

199 B.R. 498 (1996) In the Matter of RICKEL HOME CENTERS, INC., Debtor. RICKEL HOME CENTERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Robert BAFFA, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-26. Adversary No. 96-30. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. August 16, 1996. *499 Robert E. Gerber, Demet Basar, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Ne

939 P.2d 483 (1997) TERRAMATRIX, INC., f/k/a ACZ, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corporation, and Reliance National Indemnity Company, a Foreign Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95CA2109. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. May 1, 1997. *485 Holland & Hart, Harry Shulman,

813 F.2d 646 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Laura Jane WHITEHORN, a/k/a Ann Morrison; Joann Roth;Milagros H. Matese; Sharon Lee Scott; LeslieHarris; Jane Bornter; Patsy McCarthy,Appellee. (Two Cases) Nos. 86-5524(L), 86-5546. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 14, 1986.Decided March 12, 1987.Rehearing and

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si

PARTIAL OR PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS JOSEPH A. GASSEN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter was tried on the Complaint of the Trustee against Defendant, SAMUEL FOOSANER, to compel turnover, requesting an accounting, seeking damages, and on the counterclaim of FOOSANER against the Trustee. Several other Defendants originally joined by the Trustee were dismissed prior to trial. (C.P. Nos. 41, 42, 43). T

HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge: Defendant, Laura Jane Whitehom, was indicted for assault, for possession of numerous false identification documents and implements designed for manufacture of false identification, and for possession of an Uzi submachine gun and a silencer. She moved to suppress certain physical evidence, most of which had been discovered during a so-called “bomb sweep” but which was thereafter seized under a sea

292 B.R. 239 (2003) In re AWC LIQUIDATION CORP., Debtor. Iron Mountain Corp., Appellant, v. AWC Liquidation Corp., Appellee. No. Civ.A. 99-542 GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 26, 2003. *240 Douglas A. Shactman, Shactman & Assoc., Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff. Mitchell Eisenberg, Norwalk, CT,

HALL, Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND This case is a part of a longstanding conflict within the East Ramapo School District (the “District”) in Rockland County, New York. The Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Student-Plaintiffs”) are students who are currently enrolled in the District’s public school system. They allege that a majority of the East Ramapo School District Board (“School Board”) are of the Orthodox/Ha-sidic Jew