Cases

Goff, Justice. This case arises from a tragic accident where an uninsured driver under the influence of methamphetamine struck and killed Brian Harris who was mowing his home's lawn near the roadside. Harris's estate sought uninsured motorist benefits under his employer's commercial auto policy, claiming he qualified for coverage under the policy term "others we

Kirsch, Judge. Erie Indemnity Company, as the Attorney-In-Fact for the Subscribers at Erie Insurance Exchange (together, “Erie”), 1 appeals the trial court’s summary judgment decision in favor of the widow and estate of Brian L. Harris. On appeal, Erie raises the following restated issue: Whether the trial court erred as

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM [¶ 1] Laura A. Millay and John “Jack” E. McKay Jr. were married on November 18, 2006, and have two young children. A *220 few days before the marriage, when Millay was pregnant with their first child, McKay presented Millay with a prenuptial agreement, which she signed without benefit of

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge 11 Appellant Ron Antwon Harris was convicted by an Arkansas County jury of one count of second-degree sexual abuse. He was sentenced to serve eight years’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On, appeal, he does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Instead, he contends., that the circuit" court erred

OPINION Conti, Chief District Judge I. Introduction Pending before the court is a motion to remand filed by plaintiffs Roy Boggs and Annette Boggs (“plaintiffs”). (EOF No. 5.) On June 28,2016, Defendants Darwin Harris (“Harris”) and Gateway Tours, Inc. (“Getaway Tours”) (together “removing defendants”) removed this case to this court based upon diversity of citizenship, after the only

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this prisoner civil rights case is the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Donald Gallagher, Melvin Harris, and Brent Sharp. (ECF No. 55). The issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. Defendants’ motion will be denied.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: Timothy S. Schafer, Timothy S. Schafer, II, Todd S. Schafer, Schafer & Schafer, Merrillville, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE ALBERT MILFORD, D. O.: Jason A. Scheele, Edward L. Murphy, Rothberg Logan & Warsco LLP, Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE ST. MARGARET MERCY HEALTHCARE CENTERS, INC.: Libby Yin Goodknight, Krieg DeVault LLP, In

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Floyd wrote the opinion in which Judge Shedd and Judge Agee joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Marcus L. Harris appeals the revocation of his supervised release. The district court revoked his original term of supervised release for a technical violation, and imposed a second t

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district cour

364 S.W.3d 790 (2012) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patrick L. HARRIS, Appellant. No. WD 73910. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. April 24, 2012. *791 Rosalynn Koch, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General Laura E. Elsbury, Assistant Attorney General Jefferson C

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Introduction... 1057 I.Findings of Fact... 1060 A. Procedural Background... 1060 B. The Evidence in the Record... 1061 1. The Parties... 1062 2. Th

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING STAY Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Harris County, five Harris County Hearing Officers, and fifteen Harris County Criminal Court at Law Judges are appealing this court’s Order of Preliminary Injunction issued;on April 28, 2017.1 These defendants-2 pow ask the court to stay enforcement of the prelim

TAYLOR, J. The defendant, Angelia Harris, appeals her conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to sell within 1,000 feet of a park. Because there was insufficient circumstantial evidence of her intent to sell, we reverse the conviction and remand for *806entry of a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine. At trial, a police officer

MEMORANDUM OPINION (Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss) HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22), filed on December 12, 2012. Both parties have filed detailed memoranda supporting their respective positions. The Court heard argument and orally issued its ruling on the Motion on January 15, 2013. For the

331 S.W.3d 744 (2011) Johnny JONES, Appellant, v. HARRIS TRANSPORT and Treasurer of The State of Missouri-Custodian Of The Second Injury Fund, Respondents. No. WD 71793. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 1, 2011. Johnny E. Jones, Appellant pro se. Mark Edward Kelly, Liberty, MO, Laura Kay Van Fleet, Kansas City, MO, for respondent. Bef

PROCEDURAL HISTORY LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Orvin Harris was convicted of two counts of gratification of lust. Harris was sentenced to fifteen years on each count, with ten years suspended on the second count. His sentences were ordered to be served consecutively in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jervonne Darcile Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jervonne Darcile Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in