Cases

*409The opinion of the court was delivered by Davis, J.: Ruben de la Cerda pled guilty to one count of possession of cocaine after a previous conviction pursuant to K.S.A. 65-4160. Subsequently, the Kansas Legislature enacted S.B. 123, statutory sentencing amendments, which became effective prior to sentencing in this case. See L. 2003, ch. 135. The dist

January 28, 2015 TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00582-CR Candelario Cerda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2010-082, THE HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

PD-1292-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/9/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 2/11/2015 1:55:41 PM

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00582-CR Candelario Cerda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2010-082, THE HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00582-CR Candalario Cerda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2010-082, THE HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Justice BOYD announced the Court’s disposition and delivered a plurality opinion, in which Justice JOHNSON, Justice WILLETT, and Justice DEVINE joined. Chapter 150 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code requires “the plaintiff” in “any action or arbitration proceeding for *559damages arising out of the provision of pro

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 12-0804 444444444444 GARY WAYNE JASTER, PETITIONER, v. COMET II CONSTRUCTION, INC., JOE H. SCHNEIDER, LAURA H. SCHNEIDER, AND AUSTIN DESIGN GROUP, RESPONDENTS 444444444444444444444444444444444

JUSTICE CERDA delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, defendant, Roland Thompson, was convicted of the February 23, 1973, murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)(1) (now 720 ILCS 5/9 — 1(a)(1) (West 1992))) of Jack Akins. After defendant elected to be sentenced under the sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the murder, he was sentenc

658 N.E.2d 1349 (1995) 276 Ill.App.3d 609 213 Ill.Dec. 328 Paul PERONA, Mr. Leasing, Inc., Edward Zurek, Robert C. Izenstark, Geraldine Stupp, Silverman & Mailman, P.C., Lynn Garber, Raymond Lorah, Donald S. Mawler, Isador Weisenfelner, Nassau-Suffolk Frozen Food Corp., and Jerome D. O'Connell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., Audi AG, Volkswagen AG, Defendants-Appellees.</

628 N.E.2d 633 (1993) 256 Ill. App.3d 742 195 Ill.Dec. 169 In re the Marriage of Jimmie PLEASANT, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sandra PLEASANT, Respondent-Appellant. No. 1-91-3845. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. December 8, 1993. *634 Steven A. Drizin,

948 S.W.2d 916 (1997) Anita PORTERFIELD, Appellant, v. GALEN HOSPITAL CORPORATION, INC., d/b/a San Antonio Regional Hospital and Donna Torbet, Appellees. No. 04-96-00531-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 18, 1997. Rehearing Overruled July 30, 1997. *917 Adam Poncio, Cerda, Garriga & Poncio, P.C

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 28, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00024-CV REGINALD W. BRYANT AND FREDA R. BRYANT, Appellants V. BRAZOS KIDNEY DISEASE CENTER, CENTRAL TEXAS NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., DR. ROBERT J. GO, MD, ADELE MARY GADLIN, RN, KAY DUNLAP, LMSW, JENNIFER ROBINSON,

JUSTICE CERDA delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial, defendant, Robert Bennett, was convicted of first degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1) and armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2). He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of 20 years’ imprisonment for first degree murder and seven years’ imprisonment for revocati

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion in Limine No. 1, Summary Judgment Motions on 510(k) Issue) JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. Pending are Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine No. 1 — 510(k) Clearance of the Ethicon Mesh Products by the United State Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), or Lack of FDA Enforcement Action [Docket 124], Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 24, 2021 No. 04-21-00015-CV Eric PASANISI and Tanganyika Wildlife Safari, Ltd., Appellants v. Mark VANHAM and Klineburger Vanham International Hunting Consultants, LLC.,

NUMBER 13-19-00642-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI–EDINBURG IN RE FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL LIEN LITIGATION On appeal from MDL No. 15-0360-H in the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Ti

Opinion by JUDGE ASHBY ¶ 1 This is an appeal from two separate proceedings. In the first, Steven Fritzler appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Cheryl Mitchell, the personal representative (PR) of the Estate of Edward J. Fritzler. In the second, the PR and the Estate appeal from the court's order denying attorney fees and partially denying costs. We are asked, as a matter of first impression, to decide whether the tri

OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. Appellants, The Methodist Hospital System, The Methodist Hospital, The Methodist Hospital Physician Organization, and The Methodist Hospital Research Institute,1 appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss for failure to *519serve an expert report in favor of appe

Opinion issued April 2, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00849-CV ——————————— JOHN S. BYNON M.D., Appellant V. SUSIE GARCIA, AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF RICHARD MOSTA

Laura Carter Higley, Justice, dissenting. Because the majority mistakes extreme cases of assault for cases that establish the minimum requirements of assault by threat, I respectfully dissent. In their first issue, appellants contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their claim against Shipley for assault by threat of bodily injury. Under rule 91a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure