Cases

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves two competing versions of the history and purpose of Latitude Solutions, Inc. ("LSI"). Howard Appel, Earnest Bartlett, Matthew Cohen, and John Paul DeJoria ("Appellants") characterize LSI as a publicly traded company which sought to commercialize technology that could remediate contaminated water but was unsuccessful as a speculative venture. On the other hand, LSI's bankruptcy trustee,

MCDONALD, J. Appellant Richard Hinde appeals the circuit court’s ruling that a helicopter sight-seeing tour facility is a permitted use within the Amusement/Commercial (AC) zoning district pursuant to Article VII, Section 712.1 of the Horry County Zoning Ordinance (County Ordinance). Hinde contends the circuit court erred in failing to recognize and defer to the findings of fact made by the Horry County Board of Zoning Appeals (

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN A. GIBNEY, JR., District Judge. This class action arises principally from the failure of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), a consumer reporting agency, to disclose the true source of information on certain credit reports. According to Michael T. Dreher and the class plaintiffs (collectively “Dreher”), Ex-perian’s decision to hide the true source of infor

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 50(a) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 1 MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a case brought by Plaintiff David Alan Smith against Defendant LexisNexis Screening Solutions, Inc., pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15

WALLACH, Circuit Judge. Before the court is Dependable Packaging Solutions, Ine.’s (“Dependable”) appeal regarding the classification of certain types of glass merchandise. For the reasons set forth below, the holding of the Court of International Trade (“CIT”) is affirmed. BACKGROUND Dependable imports and distributes packin

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL MIKEL H. WILLIAMS, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel and Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions. (Dkt. 34). Having reviewed the parties’ submissions on this matte» (Dkts. 34, 34-1, 40, 40-1 though 40-5, and 42), and having entertained oral argument on October 3, 2012, the Court hereby enters the following Order

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD BRODY, individually and as ) representative of Selling Shareholders, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim- ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0507-LWW ) DCIM SOLUTIONS, LLC, and IGEM ) COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STELLAR IT SOLUTIONS, INC. and : KARTIK KRISHNAMURTHY, : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-2015 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 24

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. This is an “unsolicited fax” action brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“Maryland TCPA”), Md. Code Ann. Com. Law §§ 14-3201, et seq., by a group of five Plaintiffs: (1) Martin Pasco; (2) Baltimore Podiatry Group, Drs. Scheffler &

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Zurich Insurance Co., 2015 IL App (1st) 131529 Appellate Court MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZURICH Caption INSURANCE COMPANY and ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants (Continental Casualty Company; National Fire Insurance Comp

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1695 Filed: March 4, 2025 Reissued: March 17, 2025 † WARRIOR FOCUSED SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and VALIANT GLOBAL DEFENSE SERVICES, INC., Intervenor-Defendant. W. Brad English, Emily J. Chancey, Mic

OPINION PARSONS, Vice Chancellor. In this declaratory judgment action, the plaintiff has moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that certain provisions of a merger agreement are contrary to the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). Those provisions relate to a release of claims against the acquirer, an indemnification requireme

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge. | ,The defendant-appellant, Greg Meffert, appeals a judgment dated April 7, 2010, and, more particularly, that portion of the judgment denying his motion for JNOV. We affirm. Plaintiffs-appellees, Southern Electronic Supply, Inc. (“Southern”) and Active Solutions, L.L.C. (“Active Solutions”) describe themselves as business collaborators who developed and marketed to th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL A. CRABTREE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1266 (CKK) ENVIRONMENTAL RECLAMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 27, 2021) Plaintiff

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 888 The Alabama State Personnel Board, an agency of the State of Alabama ("the Board"), petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order referring the underlying case to a special master. We grant the petition and issue the writ. Facts and Procedural H

374 B.R. 556 (2007) In re GATEWAY ACCESS SOLUTIONS, INC., Debtor. Andrew C. Nester, Benjamin C. Steele, David F. Wiener, Steele and Associates and Anchor Bay Corporation, Movants, v. Gateway Access Solutions, Inc., Respondents. No. 5:07-50051RNO. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 24, 2007. *557

369 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) FMC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01553. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 16, 2005. *540 *541 *542 Abbe F. Fletman, Kelly Dobbs Bunting, Wolf, Block, Schorr

Opinion issued June 1, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ——————————— NO. 01-22-00434-CV ——————————— METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant V. TRANS-GL

ORDER ROY B. DALTON JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the following: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Final Judgment on Plaintiffs Patent Infringement Claim (Doc. No. 74), filed October 6, 2011; 2. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Charles Benedict (Doc. No. 81), filed October 1

WEBB, J. Plaintiff, Consumer Crusade, Inc. (Consumer), appeals the judgment dismissing its complaint against defendant, Affordable Health Care Solutions, Inc. (Affordable), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Consumer’s complaint alleged that Affordable had sent out unsolicited advertisements via facsimile (fax) to persons in the State of Colorado in vio