Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Larson v. Ingwersen”
Larson v. Calder's Park Co.public domain
WEBER, J. Laura Richardson, as guardian ad litem of her son, David Larson, eleven years of age, instituted this action in the district court of Salt Lake county against the defendant for the recovery of damages for the loss of the boy’s right eye as a *328result of defendant’s alleged negligence. The case was tried before the court with a jury, and a verdict was rende
State v. Gallowaypublic domain
REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice (concurring specially). Because I do not agree with the holding in division II of majority’s decision, I concur only in result. The majority holds trial court has discretion to permit Professor Loftus to detail the incidents and results of a factually unrelated experiment conducted by another, and then base her opinion squarely on the other’s conclusions (“[Tjh
Good v. AB Chance Co.public domain
565 P.2d 217 (1977) Suzanne M. GOOD, Individually and as parent, next friend and natural guardian of her minor children, Terry E. Good, Sandra K. Good and Kelly Jo Good, on their behalf, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. A. B. CHANCE CO., a corporation, Pitman Manufacturing Co., a corporation, Elder Equipment Leasing, Inc., a corporation, and Elder Trailer and Body, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-551.
Stanford v. Lyonpublic domain
Van Fleet, V. C. The principal object of this suit is to remove and abate a xtuisauce. The premises in controversy are situate on the southeast corner of Mulberry and Elm streets, in the city of Newark. They were originally owned by Dr. Luther G. Thomas. He died ou the 1st day of May, 1864, leaving a will, bearing date March 13th, 1863. By his will the loans in quo was devised as follows: “