Cases

Introduction Philip M. Hess, Presiding Judge The State of Missouri appeals the Circuit Court of St. Louis County’s order *818 granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the State’s indictment for possession of child pornography violated the statute of limitations p

25 A.3d 747 (2011) Larry L. WRIGHT,[1] Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 68, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: July 13, 2011. Decided: August 1, 2011. *748 Bruce A. Rogers, Esquire, of Bruce A. Rogers, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware; for Appellant.</

OPINION CHOY, Circuit Judge: Peltier appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. His petition alleges that the imposition by the Idaho state court of a sentence of twenty years imprisonment upon revocation of his probation violated his right under the fifth and fourteenth amendments against being placed twice

(2008) Larry L. WRIGHT and Gary L. Jones, Plaintiffs, v. C & M TIRE, INC., Defendant. No. 07-2197-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM & ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. Plaintiffs, both formerly employed at defendant's Kansas City, Kansas facility, filed suit against defendant allegi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 634 F.3d 770.

OPINION JIM R. BRIGHT, CHIEF JUSTICE The disagreement that underlies this appeal arises from the purchase and sale of a eottoh crop in Dawson County for the crop *517 year 2010. After a jury trial, and in accordance with answers to questions presented to it by the trial cour

111 F.3d 414 65 USLW 2707 John L. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Terry L. MORRIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-1837, 95-6451, 95-4160, 95-6366. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. April 11, 1997 Thaddeus-X, briefed, Jackson, MI, pro se.

ENTRY ORDER 2022 VT 6 SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 22-AP-002 JANUARY TERM, 2022 State of Vermont } APPEALED FROM: } } Superior Court, Windsor Unit, v. } Criminal Division

Cl^ of 4ta Cou/^ J^ 08 20/5 Pvx^+iVi TtXa Clerk ££'. LarrS &-Jitnt uir>qVit v, The Ste~k of Texas D«ari l\Wl leasts £/\dcseJ fltase. -fiwJ -fV ' foliouAYi* inslrvwo) io k ^?(eJ /, in your office iVi -fke 3Love r^-fcr-tnao. c^se nu^ler fkd±e dait sfs^^ this U+to, Pk2,e -fi\e 5nJ fW.-ft me ^f +lo€ fle,Vu fal r ^ (Xi* (d m^^-f/n TDCJ inmate irvsl h/Ad accoivrf ^eAfits-f/o/i X uuaoi -ho -fln

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-350-CV MICHAEL LOU GARRETT APPELLANT V.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-030-CV MICHAEL LOU GARRETT APPELLANT V. LARRY E. BERGER, TINA L. APPELLEES CARROL, TINA S. VITOLO, TRACY M. KUTAVA, JERRI HAIR, VIKKI D. WRIGHT, DAVID R. SKELTON, BECKY PRICE, JOSEPH C. BOYLES,

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-030-CV MICHAEL LOU GARRETT APPELLANT V. LARRY E. BERGER, TINA L. APPELLEE

</

</

, 32 ,@3')-~@1,@3 Mm\u”: ' REcE\vEDlN C\\DQ_\ ~L\:o;¥¢k couRToFchMlNALAPPEALs C_|.\_`;Q»\'f\ 439 `HK\E C_DLML)V l MAR 122015 P.(J.BO> l ____ ' Abe\ Acosta, C|erk \”»\u£;°~ .. \EU .\'\%'1\\ ‘ RE? \,\NL\N \:.u\cm~_m\€, \/\l\rc§c)&\lc 1 \I§. '-TK/\»:; §AQAB C;Mm; mum\a,;,@ 3337&@1»4§ _ §\ND 335“1@%{~ g LV\>L\@S_D P\Mr>£\~ Q\M> ’v\r\\§i §e>\\ousmci max §Lum:o¥ `F; <:\\\E_D ms N(GM_ &§§» ~§V\r£ \£\\0001£ R\:$;RQ\ZV\\CL£’ §Ausi b\juvv\\`o€.(£$

, 32 ,US'?»ZJZ,@$ Mox\?~¢:\}\ ._”L GAC`)K*”J . ' RECE|VED lN C\\QQ\ vl\:.<>;lr& couR'r oF chM¢NAL APPEALs' C_LEQ~\§ QSY\ "C\r\\.':`. C oLML)V l MAR 12 2015 ' Abel Acosta, Clerk \”»\ué;m .."\1;\QAB C;Ml,;. NM\Q¢,E 333>')2@~\»4\ _ .. mm zzz>ww-E> _B~.:_A\§\,€, .Q\`MD \SV\L-", §B\\OMLMCE. J9¥/\[;

ARW\Y?\\{ 10 53@\5 3,@37 © ._ R v (1\\0@\ \{,\w§q@` couRT o: §§1\/15/?L|§!PPEALS ’ l JA C_\E_DX\ @§111\(-`_ (:©LALA§` . 1112 2015 DD.B@>:sc> 13\\§§ 1113 \\(B\ML ®QY`\C,E, 1\)\)51\(\1€’, P\\DO\)\E. '7\11;§§11\$1\)&: C,J\US(_ Mw\" 131.11~.?\§&%

47 F.3d 1178 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. La

806 N.E.2d 311 (2004) Brandy D. STANIFER, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Travis G. WRIGHT, Appellee-Defendant. No. 77A01-0305-CV-182. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 14, 2004. *312 Larry J. Wagner, Wagner Crawford Gambill & Trout, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Shannon L. Robinson, Kelley Belcher & Brown, Blo

ORRICK, Senior District Judge: Steven L. Brooks, in custody in the State of Washington following his conviction of first degree murder, appeals pro se from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington denying his petition for a writ of habe-as corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition he claims that