⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Larry G. Busbee”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-07-09 · Published · cited 12× · 251 So. 3d 291
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D16-5875 _____________________________ ANTHONY PAUL PEOPLES, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ___________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge. July 9, 2018 B.L. THOMAS, C.J. In 2013
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2011-10-20 · Published · cited 5× · 824 F. Supp. 2d 1339; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121794; 2011 WL 5025835
824 F.Supp.2d 1339 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Milton E. McGREGOR, Thomas E. Coker, Larry P. Means, James E. Preuitt, Harri Anne H. Smith, Jarrell W. Walker, Jr., and Joseph R. Crosby. Criminal Action No. 2:10cr186-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. October 20, 2011. *1342 Justin v. Shur, P
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008-01-17 · Published · cited 496× · 513 F.3d 1261; 75 Fed. R. Serv. 601; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 979; 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,077; 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 716; 2008 WL 150585
513 F.3d 1261 (2008) Greg GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAGBY ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-14440. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 17, 2008. *1262 *1263 *1264 *1265
District Court, D. Nevada · 2014-06-24 · Published · cited 5× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 1002; 2014 WL 2863259; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85721
ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC (“Enterprise”) and Vanguard Car Rental USA, LLC’s (‘“Vanguard”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability. Doc. # 63.1 Plaintiffs Lydia Lee (“Lee”) and Carolyn Bissonette (“Bis-sonette”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Response (Doc. # 90), t
Causey v. Hartpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 240 Ga. 280; 240 S.E.2d 23; 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1474
Undercofler, Presiding Justice. Eugene "Dink” Causey was arrested in Floyd County, Georgia, on a warrant issued by Governor George Busbee pursuant to extradition proceedings from Governor George Wallace of Alabama. He filed a habeas corpus petition, which was denied, and appeals. We affirm. Causey alleges two grounds for reversal. One, that the habeas court failed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of
Wilson v. Dallaspublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011-11-01 · Published · cited 30× · 403 S.C. 411; 743 S.E.2d 746
Justice BEATTY. Robert L. Buchanan, Jr. and Adele J. Pope (“Appellants”), formerly personal representatives for The Estate of James Brown and trustees of The James Brown 2000 Irrevocable Trust, appeal from circuit court orders that (1) approved a settlement agreement pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 62-3-1102 (2009) of pending litigation concerning the estate; and (2) removed Appellants from their fiduciary positions and appointed
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985-08-05 · Published · cited 15× · 501 N.E.2d 1211; 28 Ohio App. 3d 24; 28 Ohio B. 34; 1985 Ohio App. LEXIS 10363
On August 31, 1979, Larry Edgerson, appellee, was injured when he fell from a tower he was painting due to an electrical shock. The tower was located on the premises of appellant Adalet-PLM Division, Scott Fetzer Company (hereinafter "Adalet"). At least eight feet above the tower were electrical power lines owned and operated by appellant Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (hereinafter "CEI"). Appellee filed suit against Adalet and CEI on April 16, 1981, seeking $1,000,000 in dam
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985-11-07 · Published · cited 25× · 621 F. Supp. 1518; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14077
621 F.Supp. 1518 (1985) Herbert CASON v. TEXACO, INC. Civ. A. No. 83-936-B. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. November 7, 1985. *1519 *1520 *1521 A. Justin Ourso, III, Margaret E. Woodward, Barham & Churchill, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999-08-03 · Published · cited 35× · 182 F.3d 1261; 1999 CCH OSHD 31,874; 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21455; 21 OSHC (BNA) 1446; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18166
ANDERSON, Chief Judge: These consolidated cases seek judicial review of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (“OSHA”) new standard for respiratory protection in the workplace. The separate challenges are brought by the American Iron and Steel Institute (“Industry”) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (“Doctors”) and relate to diff
Brister v. Faulknerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-06-28 · Published · cited 10× · 214 F.3d 675; 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1912; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15040; 2000 WL 763992
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs were handing out leaflets before an on-campus event at the University of Texas at Austin’s Frank C. Erwin Jr. Special Events Center (the “Erwin Center”) when they were forced to leave the property because they were interfering with the arrival and departure of the facility’s patrons. They sued university officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
Wicker v. Goodwinpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992-12-14 · Published · cited 4× · 813 F. Supp. 676; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20722; 1992 WL 425384
813 F.Supp. 676 (1992) Tommy WICKER, Larry Jackson, and Mel Hensley, Plaintiffs, v. Tommy L. GOODWIN, Individually and In His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas State Police; Winston Bryant, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas; and Bill Clinton, In His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, Defendants. No. LR-C-90-139. United States District
Miller v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1995-06-29 · Published · cited 629× · 132 L. Ed. 2d 762; 115 S. Ct. 2475; 515 U.S. 900; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 4462
*934Justice Ginsburg, with whom Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer join, and with whom Justice Souter joins except as to Part III — B, dissenting. . Legislative districting is highly political business. This Court has generally respected the competence of state legislatures to attend to the task. When race is the issue, however,
District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 883 F. Supp. 1535; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5837; 1995 WL 254338
883 F.Supp. 1535 (1995) Calvin B. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Respondent. No. 93-312-Civ-FTM-17D. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. April 26, 1995. *1536 Calvin B. Johnson, Bowling Green, FL, pro se. *1537 Stephen Allan Baker, Atty. Gens.
Murray v. Sevierpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 1993-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 145 F.R.D. 563; 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 620; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5137; 1993 WL 17467
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL BELOT, District Judge. Before the court are the following: 1. Motion of defendants Helen Sevier, Bass Inc., Jemison Investment, Karl Dabbs and John and Mary Does 1-X to dismiss the second amended complaint or in the alternative to transfer (Doc. 26). 2. Motion of defendant Ray W. Scott, Jr. to dismiss the second amended complaint or
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-03-23 · Published · cited 6× · 307 F.R.D. 150; 91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 134; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36466; 2015 WL 1312015
MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and Indiana Carpenters Welfare Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action suit alleging that off-label prescription payments made by Plaintiffs to Defendant Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”) were excessive and constituted unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs are entities, called third
Johnson v. Millerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994-09-12 · Published · cited 3× · 864 F. Supp. 1354; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13043; 1994 WL 506780
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of Georgia’s Eleventh Congressional District and seek an injunction against its further use in congressional elections. Because we find that the district violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, we grant Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief and wil
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994-12-29 · Published · cited 41× · 159 F.R.D. 473; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19093; 1994 WL 735621
OPINION RE MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS HILLMAN, Senior District Judge. Before the court in this securities fraud case is plaintiff Thomas Acito’s motion for class certification. Plaintiff, a purchaser of defendant The Upjohn Company’s stock, alleges defendants: (1) violated Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder; (2) violated Section 20 of
Johnson v. Millerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 922 F. Supp. 1556; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19774
ORDER This Court’s September 12, 1994, Order declared Georgia’s Eleventh Congressional District unconstitutional. Johnson v. Miller, 864 F.Supp. 1354 (S.D.Ga.1994) (“Johnson I”). The Supreme Court affirmed our decision in Miller v. Johnson, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2475, 132 L.Ed.2d 762 (1995) (“Johnson II ”). In accordance with the Supreme Court’s affirmance, we held a hearing on August 22,
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
AP-77,047 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/19/2015 3:07:54 PM Accepted 6/22/2015 3:35:12 PM June 22, 2015 ABEL ACOSTA
Shaw v. Huntpublic domain
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994-08-22 · Published · cited 30× · 861 F. Supp. 408; 1994 WL 457269
AMENDED OPINION PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge: This action, brought by several white citizens and registered voters of the State of North Carolina against various state and federal officials, challenges the constitutionality of the congressional redistricting1 plan (the Plan) adopted by the North Carolina General Assembly following the 1990 decennial census.2