Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Larry A. Mock and Amanda K. Mock”
O'Brien v. Great Parks of Hamilton Cty.public domain
[Cite as O'Brien v. Great Parks of Hamilton Cty., 2020-Ohio-6949.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ROBERT G. O’BRIEN, : APPEAL NO. C-190697 TRIAL NO. A-1802615 and : CHERYL O’BRIEN,
Vrakas v. County of Will, Illinoispublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Vrakas v. County of Will, Illinois, 2015 IL App (3d) 140424 Appellate Court GEORGE VRAKAS, DAVID J. ADAMS, RONALD ADAMS, Caption ROSE ALBANO, DOREICE ALEXANDER, APRIL ARAMBASICH, ROBERT D. BAIKIE, KAREN M. BAKER, TERENCE A. BERGIN, CHERYL L. BEVERLY, JANETTE E.
08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 18, 2018 Session CINDY HATFIELD, ET AL. v. ALLENBROOKE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004249-10 Donna M. Fields, Judge
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
ACCEPTED 15-25-00084-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/3/2025 3:01 PM No. 15-25-00084-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL WAYNE STROUTHpublic domain
FILED 04/06/2026 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE Clerk of the AT KNOXVILLE Appellate Courls Assigned on Briefs November 18, 2025
Garvin v. American Telephonepublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk
People v. Barrerapublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCOS ESQUIVEL BARRERA, Defendant and Appellant. S103358 Los Angeles County Superior Court PA029724 June 1, 2026 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero an
United States v. Youngpublic domain
RULING AND ORDER JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss for Selective and Vindictive Prosecution (Doc. 11) by Defendant Christopher G. Young. The motion is opposed. (Doc. 12.) Evidentiary hearings were held on September 15, 2016, and October 5, 2016. (Docs. 24 & 37.) Both parties have provided extensive post-hearing briefing. (Docs
Garvin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.public domain
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Terry A. Garvin, et al., (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T) on their claims to recover termination allowances brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Facts Appellant
McConnell v. Federal Election Commissionpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu