Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Daniel R. Lara appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration that he was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and thus not entitled to disability benefits. We affirm. I There was substantial evidence to justify the administrate law judge’s (ALJ) failure to pr

*956566 U. S. 974; 566 U. S. 650; 566 U. S. 987; 566 U. S. 988; 566 U. S. 1011; 565 U. S. 1266; 565 U. S. 1268; 566 U. S. 942; 566 U. S. 945; 566 U. S. 946; 566 U. S. 976; 566 U. S. 976;

MEMORANDUM *** Daniel R. Lara appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration that he was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and thus not entitled to disability benefits. We affirm. I There was substantial evidence to justify the administrate law judge’s (ALJ) failure to pr

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE __________ On Appeal from the United

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSION

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE __________ On Appeal from th

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSION

ORDER The opinion filed on August 4, 2015, and published at 795 F.3d 1177, is hereby amended and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges W. Fletcher, Hurwitz, and Baylson have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges W. Fletcher and Hurwitz have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc

OPINION BAYLSON, District Judge: Appellant Heather Rounds appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the decision of a Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Although we find no error in the ALJ’s rulings on several issues, we vacate in part and remand because t

Filed 7/16/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ADAMMA ISON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A170267 v. RICARDO LARA, as Insurance (Alameda County Commissioner, etc., Super. Ct. No. 22CV008022) Defendant and Respond

Filed 12/5/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CALIFORNIA FAIR PLAN B336043 ASSOCIATION, Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 21STCV38060 v. RICARDO LARA, as Insurance Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–0919 Filed May 9, 2014 NICOLE LARA SHUMATE, Appellant, vs. DRAKE UNIVERSITY a/k/a DRAKE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Eliza J. Ovrom, Judge. Appellee seeks further review of court of appeals decision reinstating private lawsuit by service dog

289 F.Supp.2d 198 (2003) CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al. v. Tommy THOMPSON No. CIV.A.3:00 CV 2020 S. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 23, 2003. *199 *200 Maite Barainca, Richard J. Lynch, Attorney General's Office, Health & Human

729 F.Supp. 415 (1989) LARA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOUTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP, Dorney Park Coaster Co., Inc., Charles E. MacKenzie, Steven M. Okun, Elwood M. Bernhard, Ethel F. Lichtenwalner, William T. Ott and Ronnie J. Rice, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-8138. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 27, 1989. *416 Fra

177 F.3d 890 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3905, 1999 DailyJournal D.A.R. 4982Cody CAMPBELL, a minor by Darlene CAMPBELL, his guardian,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Kenneth S. APFEL,1 Commissioner, SocialSecurity Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-35285. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argue

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00420-CV Stephanie Muth, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellants v. Mirabel Voe, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Antonio Voe, a Minor, and Wanda Roe, Individually and

67 Cal.2d 365 (1967) 432 P.2d 202 62 Cal. Rptr. 586 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TONY MONTOYA LARA and RAYMOND MORALES ALVAREZ, Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. Crim. 10061. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. September 29, 1967. *369 Everett E. Ricks, Jr., and J.

*1214538 U. S. 1063; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 830; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 1089; ante, p. 1075; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 1073;

*1214538 U. S. 1063; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 830; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 1089; ante, p. 1075; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 1073;