Cases

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting : by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : Department of Environmental : Protection and the Commonwealth of : Pennsylvania Department of : Conservation and Natural Resources, : and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat : Commission, and the Pennsylvania : Game Commission, : Plaintiffs :

109 S.W.3d 317 (2003) In the Matter of the CONSERVATORSHIP OF Ellen P. GROVES. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. November 8, 2000 Session. February 11, 2003. *322 Landon W. Meadow and Bruce A. Kennedy, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Glendon P. Groves. Thomas R. Meeks, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellee

787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,

2024 IL App (4th) 230428 FILED May 20, 2024 NO. 4-23-0428 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate

NOLEN v. STATE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us e-

(2008) ORECK DIRECT, LLC v. DYSON, INC. Civil Action No. 07-2744. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 21, 2008. ORDER AND REASONS[1] SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Dyson, Inc.'s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because matters ou

563 F.3d 38 (2009) Wayne BERRIER; Brenda Gregg, in their own right and as parents and natural guardians of Ashley Berrier, a minor, Appellants v. SIMPLICITY MANUFACTURING, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff v. *39 Susie Shoff; Melvin Shoff, Third-Party Defendants. No. 05-3621. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: January

988 A.2d 20 (2010) 190 Md. App. 97 PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, et al. v. Keith LONGTIN. No. 1818, Sept. Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 27, 2010. *23 Rajesh A. Kumar (Jay H. Creech, Stephanie P. Anderson, County Atty., on the brief), Upper Marlboro, for appellant. Car

Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-21-2009 Berrier v. Simplicity Mfg Inc Precedential or

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

[J-80-2013] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ. TERRENCE D. TINCHER AND JUDITH : No. 17 MAP 2013 R. TINCHER, : Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, : Appellees

840 A.2d 188 (2003) 154 Md. App. 446 Bonnie L. CORBY v. Daniel P. McCARTHY. No. 00037, Sept. Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 30, 2003. *192 Ronald L. Ogens (Michael Reuter, Deckelbaum, Ogens & Raftery, Chtd. on the brief), Bethesda, for appellant. Charles F. Morgan (Ho

Opinion of the Court COX, Chief Judge: Colonel Maxwell was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of members at Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, of four specifications alleging violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. According to ¶ 60c(1), Part IV, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.): Article 13

In Re: M. P., No. 3, September Term, 2023 COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE – MOTION TO DISMISS – JURISDICTION OF JUVENILE COURT – Supreme Court of Maryland held that juvenile court’s denial of motion of M.P., Appellant, to dismiss for lack of juvenile court jurisdiction was immediately appealable under collateral order doctrine. Supreme Court further held that juvenile court does not have jurisdiction over child in delinquency proceeding where child was 10 to 12 years old at time of alleged delinquen

981 F.Supp. 480 (1997) Fred S. HAVENICK, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. NETWORK EXPRESS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 96-CV-74627-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 30, 1997. *481 Reed R. Kathrein, San Francisco, CA, Henry Rosen, San Di

745 F.Supp. 1099 (1990) Tara TRACEY, a minor by her parents and natural guardians William TRACEY and Lorraine Tracey, and William and Lorraine Tracey, in their own right v. WINCHESTER REPEATING ARMS COMPANY, Western Cartridge Company, Olin Industries, Olin Corporation, Olin Corporation, Winchester Group, U.S. Repeating Arms Company, and John Doe Corporation. Civ. A. No. 87-0207. United States District

802 F.2d 75 55 USLW 2210, Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 11,134 Michael POLIUS, Roselyn Polius, and Commissioner of Labor ofthe Government of the Virgin Islands, as subrogeeof Michael Polius, Appellants in 85-3392,v.CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Appellant in 85-3393. Nos. 85-3392, 85-3393. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri