⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Langley v. Dollar General Corporation”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-3060, 24-3061, 24-3062 & 24-3063 CALEB BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellants. _________________
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-3060, 24-3061, 24-3062 & 24-3063 CALEB BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellants. _________________
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013-09-13 · Published · cited 1× · 972 F. Supp. 2d 804; 2013 WL 5231522; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131516; 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 130
ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Stacey Langley (“Plaintiff’) filed the above action against her former employer, Dollar General Stores (“Defendant”), alleging gender discrimination, *808quid pro quo sexual harassment, sexually hostile work environment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Tit
Shawhan v. Langleypublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999-06-22 · Published · cited 6× · 249 Conn. 339; 732 A.2d 170; 1999 Conn. LEXIS 209
Opinion CALLAHAN, C. J. The issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 52-192a1 authorizes a plaintiff to file, *341with respect to a single defendant, more than one offer of judgment. We conclude that § 52-192apermits aplaintiff to file only one offer of judgment as to a particular defendant. Accordingly
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001-06-29 · Published · cited 90× · 792 So. 2d 721; 2001 La. LEXIS 2027; 2001 WL 754813
792 So.2d 721 (2001) Jonathan LANGLEY v. PETRO STAR CORP. OF LA. No. 2001-C-0198. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 29, 2001. *722 Jeffrey J. Warrens, Baton Rouge, for applicant. George A. Flournoy, Alexandria, Michael B. Miller, Crowley, for respondent. KIMBALL, Justice.[*] We granted a writ of cer
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002-04-30 · Published · cited 12× · 73 S.W.3d 808; 2002 WL 418711
73 S.W.3d 808 (2002) Trudy LANGLEY, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Respondent. No. WD 60291. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 19, 2002. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer April 30, 2002. Application for Transfer Denied May 28, 2002. *809 Daniel R. Dunham
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990-03-27 · Published · cited 16× · 738 F. Supp. 1232; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11269; 1990 WL 72002
738 F.Supp. 1232 (1990) Dennis LANGLEY and Star Langley, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BANK OF WISCONSIN (formerly known as the Suring State Bank), Robert C. Safford, Keith Shallow and Peter Vandeven, Defendants. No. 87-C-371 (JPS). United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 27, 1990. *1233 Todd C. Lyster, Chicago, Ill., for p
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983-04-29 · Published · cited 32× · 651 S.W.2d 906; 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 4440
651 S.W.2d 906 (1983) CITY OF AMARILLO, Appellant, v. Thomas E. LANGLEY, et al., Appellees. No. 9385. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. April 29, 1983. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1983. *910 Gibson, Ochsner & Adkins, Randall R. Moore, Merril E. Nunn, City Atty., Amarillo, for appellant. Hoffman & W
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006-02-01 · Published · cited 29× · 436 F.3d 594; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2435; 2006 WL 229506
RESTANI, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court. KENNEDY, J. (pp. 612-614), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. MOORE, J. (pp. 614 - 627), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION RESTANI, Chief Judge. Chrysler Corporation appeals the district court’s order, ente
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 31, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00389-CV ——————————— BUCKHEAD INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC., MATTHEW J. MORGAN, AND KEVIN M. KIRTON, Appellants V. BROMPTON CO
District Court, District of Columbia · 1979-01-02 · Published · cited 4× · 471 F. Supp. 565; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15328
471 F.Supp. 565 (1979) LANGLEY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, v. Linnie HARP et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-1242. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 2, 1979. Sidney J. Silver, Washington, D. C., Everette G. Allen, Jr., Thomas A. Grant, Richmond, Va., for plaintiff. William B. Owens, J. Michael Small, Alexandria, La., Scott P. Cr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-10-12 · Published · cited 0× · 431 F.3d 643
ORDER The Opinion filed on October 13, 2005, slip opinion at 14045, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 846 F.2d 1302; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7921; 1988 WL 51287
*1303 TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: L In May 1978, Paul M. Jackson purchased Bayshore Apartments, an apartment complex in Pensacola, Florida, planning to convert the apartments into condominiums and then sell them. In July 1978, he sold a 30% interest in the apartment complex to Frank and B
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1975-05-05 · Published · cited 43× · 314 So. 2d 324; 77 A.L.R. 3d 570; 1975 Miss. LEXIS 1678
314 So.2d 324 (1975) FIRST NATIONAL BANK v. James LANGLEY. No. 47996. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 5, 1975. Rehearing Denied July 7, 1975. *325 Watkins & Eager, W.F. Goodman, Jr., Thomas M. Murphree, Jr., Jackson, for appellant. Davey L. Tucker, Jackson, for appellee. Before RODGERS, INZER
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-05-22 · Published · cited 8× · 114 So. 3d 567; 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 1000; 2013 WL 2215557; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1046
GREMILLION, Judge. BThe defendant, the State of Louisiana, through. the Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH), appeals a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Murphy Cormier General Contractor, Inc. (MCGC).1 For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND MCGC manufactures, sells, and installs residential and commercial mechanic
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971-02-26 · Published · cited 8× · 111 N.H. 32; 274 A.2d 798; 1971 N.H. LEXIS 116
111 N.H. 32 (1971) ADRIANUS VAN HOOIJDONK v. KENNETH W. LANGLEY. No. 6042. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. February 26, 1971. Shaw & Eldredge, Flynn, Powell & McGuirk, and Charles F. Dalton, Jr. (Mr. Dalton orally), for the plaintiff. Boynton, Waldron & Dill (Mr. Jeremy R. Waldron orally), for the defendant.
State v. Langleypublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1958-03-19 · Published · cited 15× · 323 P.2d 301; 214 Or. 445; 315 P.2d 560
214 Or. 445 (1958) 315 P.2d 560 323 P.2d 301 STATE OF OREGON v. LANGLEY Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued December 18, 1957. Affirmed March 19, 1958. Petition for rehearing denied April 23, 1958. Denied certiorari October 21, 1958. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Peter S. Herma
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997-01-10 · Published · cited 46× · 103 F.3d 1180
103 F.3d 1180 Robert H. YOUNG; EDX Holdings, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver forHilton Head Bank & Trust Company, N.A.; First PacificCorporation; Swiss-American Fidelity Insurance Company AndGuarantee, Limited; Attilio Franciulli; John Roche; TomRuhf; George Strickland; Price Waterhouse, CharteredAccountants, a Bahamian Partnership; Lee S. Piper; Herb
Langley v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956-11-21 · Published · cited 5× · 95 S.E.2d 115; 245 N.C. 59; 1956 N.C. LEXIS 528
95 S.E.2d 115 (1956) 245 N.C. 59 David LANGLEY v. George TAYLOR, Chairman, and Tommie Sparrow and J. L. Lancaster, Members Comprising the Beaufort County A. B. C. Board on June 15, 1956. No. 31. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 21, 1956. *116 John A. Wilkinson, LeRoy Scott, Washington, for plainti