Cases

725 F.Supp.2d 925 (2010) Kenneth Burton LANG, Jr., Petitioner, v. Vince CULLEN,[1] Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent. Case No. CV 91-04061 MMM. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 23, 2010. *932 Kenneth Burton Lang, Jr., Tamal, CA, pro se. Gwen E. Freeman, Knapp Peterse

Opinion BUTZ, J. Plaintiffs Joe and Marieanne Cullen stated alternate counts1 that alleged defendants Paul and Geraldine Corwin acted either negligently or fraudulently in failing to disclose the defective condition of the garage roof when the Corwins sold a vacation home to the Cullens.2 The Corwins moved for summary judgment on the

WORTHINGTON, J, Plaintiff, James P. Cullen (husband), and defendant, Traci L. Cullen (wife), were married on March 25, 2000. No children were bom of the union. The parties’ relationship deteriorated and husband left the marital residence on January 16, 2003. The parties have been separated since that time. Husband and wife executed a property settlement agreement on November 6, 2003. The issue before us is whether the pr

SILER, Circuit Judge. Edward Lang, an Ohio prisoner under a death sentence, appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The district court granted Lang a Certificate of Appealability (CO

MURPHY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I. INTRODUCTION I join all portions, of the majority opinion, with the exception of sections II.C.l (addressing the calculation of Shari Lang’s base offense) and II.C.2 (addressing Lang’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2071(a)). As to those two specific sections of the majority opinion

an action, inter alia, to recover dam*794ages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Sushama Karmarkar appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cullen, J.), entered July 11, 2007, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction, with leave to renew upon the completion of discovery.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the appellant to credit the petitioner with 408 days of jail time, the appeal is from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered August 1, 1991, as directed that the appellant credit the petitioner with 408 days of jail time. Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, wi

246 B.R. 463 (2000) In re Keith W. LANG, Debtor. Annino, Draper & Moore, P.C., Plaintiff, v. Keith W. Lang, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-42781, Adversary No. 98-4177. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. March 31, 2000. *464 *465 *466 P

—Appeal and cross appeal from those parts of an order of Supreme Court, Genesee County (Noonan, J.), entered May 29, 2001, that denied plaintiffs’ motion seeking partial *961summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 (1) and that part of defendants’ cross motion seeking summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6). It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be an

This appeal was submitted without oral argument October 21, 1965, with a single assignment, viz., that the court below erred in overruling appellant's motion for new trial. The Langs brought suit for $500 against Mutual of Omaha for breach of a hospital or medical indemnity policy for expense within the indemnifying agreement on account of Mrs. Lang's averred foreshortened pregnancy which normally would have resulted in childbirth more than ten months after the policy date.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robinson Plasencia and Indramira Plasencia v. Civil No. 15-cv-249-LM Opinion No. 2016 DNH 146 Michael K. Lang, et al. O R D E R Plaintiffs Robinson Plasencia and Indramira Plasencia,1 proceeding pro se, bring this suit against Nashua police officers Michael Lang and Ryan McDermott, alle

* Headnotes 1. Witnesses, 40 Cyc., p. 2352; 2. Witnesses, 40 Cyc., p. 2352 (Anno); 3. Appeal and Error, 4 C.J., Section 2953. This action was instituted by plaintiff in the probate court of the city of St. Louis, on the 12th day of September, 1921, by the filing and presentation for allowance of the following demand: *Page 122 "St. Louis, Missouri, January 15, 1921. Estate Sy

McAvoy, J. The learned . court at Special Term granted a motion to strike out the name of Thomas Lang as a party plaintiff. The complaint sets out that Thomas Lang was an employee of the James Sugden Company and while engaged in repairing an electric cable in a manhole for the defendant Brooklyn City Railroad Company, he was overcome by gas and injured. His employer, the James Sugden Company, was insured again

CULLEN, J. This is an appeal from an order denying an injunction to restrain the defendant from constructing a wooden building in the village of New" Rochelle. The injunction was properly denied. We think that the plaintiff had no standing to maintain the action. “It is no part of the province of a court of equity to enforce the penal laws of the state or the by-laws of a corporation by an injunction unless the act sought to be re

4 Cal.2d 711 (1935) CHARLES S. SPIER, Appellant, v. MAJOR C. D. LANG et al., Respondents. L. A. No. 15380. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. December 23, 1935. William B. Spivak, J. George Gold, Ivan G. McDaniel, Jennings & Belden and Stevens Fargo for Appellants Edward A. Adams, Robert L. Collins, Maggart & Miller, Victor Ford Collins, Roy M

Wingate, S. The demonstration of relevant facts respecting the situation of the testatrix at the time of the execution of the will has merely served to strengthen the original opinion of the court that, at that time the testatrix had no active wish that the general legacy given by the second item of the instrument to stranger to her blood should be charged upon the realty which, under the third item, passed to her blood relatives

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.

This is an action brought by plaintiff as the widow of Mark Lang, deceased, who, while riding in an automobile in the State of Kansas, going west on paved Highway No. 50 and crossing its intersection with Mohawk Lane, collided with the automobile of one, Hoffman, who was proceeding east on said Highway across said intersection, which collision is alleged to have been caused by the skidding of said cars on account of an unobservable, slippery and dangerous condition arising from an accumulatio

The plaintiff, being a creditor of the Red Cross Drug Company, a domestic corporation, brought the action to enforce against certain of its stockholders their statutory liability for the indebtedness. The indebtedness arose upon an unpaid promissory note of the company, held by the plaintiff in November, 1900, and the complaint, after setting forth the particulars of the claim to be enforced, alleged that the authorized and outstanding capital stock of the drug company was of $60,000, par val

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WILLARD BARTLETT, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ. Not voting: HISCOCK, J. Absent: GRAY, J.