Cases

SYKES, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in this Title VII race discrimination case agreed in open court to settle their claims against the defendants in exchange for changes to hiring and promotional policies and $67,000 in attorney’s fees. Shortly thereafter, they had a change of heart and sought to rescind their agreement on the ground that it was more beneficial to their counsel t

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 March 26, 2007 Before Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 05-4034 JOSEPH BAPTIST, Appeal from

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this date, the Court considered Defendant Mark Sylla's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction (docket no. 86), Defendant Dewayne D. Naumann's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 82), and Defendant Equity Liaison Company's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 83), and the responses thereto. Factual and Procedural Background

670 S.E.2d 772 (2009) 53 Va. App. 266 Lamont Dante WRIGHT v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0984-07-1. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. January 13, 2009. *773 Joseph A. Sadighian, Senior Assistant Appellate Defender (Office of the Appellate Defender, on briefs), for appellant. Joshua M.

Johnson, J., ¶ 20. dissenting. I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that a defendant’s gun ownership is per se relevant to show that a defendant is a “drug dealer.” Although there may be specific instances in which gun evidence would be relevant to the State’s case against a defendant accused of selling drugs, this is not such a case. The State charged defendant with two counts of selling cocaine. A week after the se

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-1432 ____________ ARLANE JAMES, In Re: WILLIE GIBBONS; J. R. G., a minor, by his mother and legal guardian, Ikeya Crawford; D. K. L., a minor, by his mother and legal guardian, Angel Stephens; L. M. G., a minor, by her mother and legal guardian, Angel Stephens

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-4034 JOSEPH BAPTIST, RICHARD BROOKS, PRICE DUMAS, WILLIE HUNT, and LAMONT UPTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF KANKAKEE and MIKE KINKADE, Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District

135 Cal.Rptr.2d 370 (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1084 70 P.3d 359 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Lamont JONES, Defendant and Appellant. No. S024599. Supreme Court of California. June 16, 2003. Rehearing Denied August 27, 2003. Certiorari Denied April 5, 2004.

764 So.2d 457 (2000) Therron Lamont HERVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 1999-KA-00578-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. February 29, 2000. Rehearing Denied May 16, 2000. Certiorari Denied August 17, 2000. *458 David L. Walker, Southaven, Attorney for Appellant. Of

Judicial Merit Selection Commission Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Chairman Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel Sen. Ronnie A. Sabb Emma Dean, Counsel Sen. Scott Talley Rep. J. Todd Rutherford Rep. Jeffrey E. “Jeff” Johnson Rep. Micajah P. “Micah” Caskey, IV Hope Blackley Lucy Grey McIver Andrew N. Safran J.P. “Pete” Strom Jr.

THIRD DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules April 30, 2026

777 N.W.2d 739 (2010) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jonard Brandon McDANIEL, Appellant. No. A07-2160. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 21, 2010. *742 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Linda K. Jenny, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. <

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, Laura Poitras, a journalist and documentary filmmaker, Compl. ¶ 2, ECF No. 1, challenges the responses of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), a component of the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP"), a component of the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), to her records requests submitted pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

Case: 22-60596 Document: 00516852540 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 9, 2023

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents us with a difficult issue of first impression. John Doe, a registered sex offender, brought a facial challenge under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to a ban enacted by the City of Albuquerque that prohibited registered sex offenders from entering the City’s public libraries. The district court denied a motion to dismiss brought by

43 F.3d 1176 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,187, 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 801 Joe HEATON; Edward L. Stockwell; Natilee J. Crammer;Donald L. Daniels; Frank H. Parker, Jr.; Robert Smith;Robert D. Norris; Leon D. Maifield; Carmen D. Jenkins;Jerry Giboney; Hazel Elder; Linda F. Winingear; Tina M.Meder; Jack Meder, Sr.; Gary L. Kern; Barbara L. Dolezal;June Cornelius; C.F. Cornelius; Kenneth W.

313 F.Supp. 37 (1970) William Price VAUGHAN, for himself, and Miriam I. Vaughan, for herself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Willis H. BOWER, Superintendent, Arizona State Hospital, State of Arizona, Defendants. No. Civ-70-10 Phx. United States District Court, D. Arizona. May 14, 1970. *38 Anthony B. Ching, Chi

SIXTH DIVISION February 2, 2007 No. 1-04-1852 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County. ) v.