⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Lammert v. National Surety Corporation”

District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975-10-15 · Published · cited 3× · 403 F. Supp. 498; 36 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6287; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15732
403 F.Supp. 498 (1975) The AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, for itself and as successor by merger to the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. No. H-131. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 15, 1975. *499 *500 William G. Delana, J. Danford Anth
Oregon Supreme Court · 1968-10-16 · Published · cited 6× · 446 P.2d 103; 251 Or. 377; 1968 Ore. LEXIS 466
446 P.2d 103 (1968) ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON, a National Banking Association, As Executor of the Estate of J.C. Compton, Deceased; G.L. Compton, Glen L. Rowell and Glens Falls Insurance Company, a Corporation, Respondents. Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1. Argued and Submitted September 6, 1968.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-03-18 · Published · cited 46× · 953 F.3d 417
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ANDREA PERRY, individually and on behalf of all other ┐ Ohio residents similarly situated, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-06-13 · Published · cited 393× · 180 L. Ed. 2d 166; 131 S. Ct. 2296; 564 U.S. 135; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4380; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 1124; 79 U.S.L.W. 4466
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Resto v. Walkerpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978-11-28 · Published · cited 16× · 383 N.E.2d 1361; 66 Ill. App. 3d 733; 23 Ill. Dec. 334; 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3721
66 Ill. App.3d 733 (1978) 383 N.E.2d 1361 ANNA RESTO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JACK WALKER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-1738. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed November 28, 1978. *734 *735 Jerrold Blumoff, of Brown, Dashow, A
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975-04-14 · Published · cited 38× · 522 S.W.2d 809; 1975 Mo. LEXIS 298
SEILER, Judge. These appeals (which reach the writer on reassignment) follow a declaratory judgment action which seeks a determination of which automobile liability insurer owes what under the omnibus clause coverage in one policy and the non-owned automobile clause coverage in the other. An opinion was handed down by the court of appeals, St. Louis District. That court thereafter overruled motions for rehearing but because of