⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Lamar v. C R Bard Incorporated”

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 7× · 584 S.E.2d 390; 355 S.C. 154; 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 73
355 S.C. 154 (2003) 584 S.E.2d 390 Marshall EADDY, Respondent, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION, Self-Insured Employer, Appellant. No. 3643. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted April 7, 2003. Decided May 27, 2003. Rehearing Denied August 21, 2003. *156 Grad
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017-05-01 · Published · cited 27× · 855 F.3d 1356; 123 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1045; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7650; 2017 WL 1541518
DYK, Circuit Judge. Helsinn Healthcare S.A. (“Helsinn”) is the owner of the four patents-in-suit di *1360 rected to intravenous formulations of palo-nosetron for reducing or reducing the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (“CINV”). Helsinn brought suit
Dickerson v. Baileypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-06-26 · Published · cited 43× · 336 F.3d 388; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12978; 2003 WL 21469120
WIENER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Doyne Bailey, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (the “Administrator”), appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Plaintiffs-Appellees C.A. Dickerson et al. (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs have challenged portions of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code (“TABC”) that regulat
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 17-10636 Date Filed: 08/19/2020 Page: 1 of 86 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10636 ________________________ Agency No. A072-565-851 PANKAJKUMAR S. PATEL, JYOTSNABEN P. PATEL, NISHANTKUMAR PATEL,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-08-19 · Published · cited 100× · 971 F.3d 1258
Case: 17-10636 Date Filed: 08/19/2020 Page: 1 of 86 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10636 ________________________ Agency No. A072-565-851 PANKAJKUMAR S. PATEL, JYOTSNABEN P. PATEL, NISHANTKUMAR PATEL,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-06-26 · Published · cited 74× · 571 F.3d 108; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13792; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 232; 2009 WL 1815428
571 F.3d 108 (2009) Joseph BRAUNSTEIN, Chapter 7 Trustee of TMG Holdings, LLC and of Edwin A. McCabe, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Edwin A. McCABE; Karren K. McCabe, Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Craig J. Ziady, Fourth-Party Defendant, Appellee, Dann Ocean Towing, Inc., Defendant. Nos. 08-1690, 08-1691. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Hyatt v. Dollpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-08-11 · Published · cited 5× · 576 F.3d 1246; 91 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1865; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17849; 2009 WL 2432734
MICHEL, Chief Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Gilbert P. Hyatt appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Jon Dudas, in his official capacity as the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”),1 sustaining the decision of the *1248Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) to uphold the examiner’s r
District Court, C.D. California · 1972-11-16 · Published · cited 7× · 57 F.R.D. 189; 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1143; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11162
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW HAUK, District Judge. Plaintiff’s motion for an order that this action may be maintained as a class action and defendant’s motion for an order that this action may not be maintained as a class action came on regularly for hearing on Monday, September 25, 1972; the Court having heard oral argument and having considered the memo-randa of points and authorities and other
Delia v. Berkeypublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978-12-19 · Published · cited 17× · 395 A.2d 1189; 41 Md. App. 47; 1978 Md. App. LEXIS 295
Liss, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Melvin, J., concurs and filed a concurring opinion at page 55 infra. *48It was the Bard who best expressed the wounds that slander does inflict. He said: Slander, Whose edge is sharper than the
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1979-11-20 · Published · cited 8× · 482 F. Supp. 867; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8450
482 F.Supp. 867 (1979) UNITED STATES of America v. Harold ROSENTHAL a/k/a Allyn Milton Karr, George Rawls a/k/a Howard Kenith Leigh, Jorge Luis Valdes, Oscar Rivera Nunez, Orlando Rengel, Sixto Granados Enriquez, Avoro Martin, Norman Downs, Howard "Sonny" Hawkins, Ned Ames, James Patrick Herman, Roger E. Beckman, Brian J. Brinker, James Sever, William D. "Bill" McCain, Leonard Bonnell Steele, Fredrick Francis Haussman, James Albert Costello, Henr
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 86 F. Supp. 84; 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2172
86 F.Supp. 84 (1949) UNITED STATES v. DETTRA FLAG CO., Inc. et al. Cr. No. 14707. United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania. August 22, 1949. *85 James P. McCormick, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. James E. Gallagher, Jr., and Wilson Stradley, of Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, all of Phila
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 360
OPINION By ALLEN, CJ. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court which confirmed the findings and order of a referee in bankruptcy determining that the appellee had a lien upon the property of Taylorcraft Aviation Corporation, debtor, superior to that of the United States for taxes. The facts are not disputed and as found by the referee are in substance as follows: November
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 168 F.2d 808; 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 360; 39 Ohio Op. 132; 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1125; 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 4015
ALLEN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order óf the District Court which confirmed the findings and order of a referee in bankruptcy determining that the appellee had a lien upon the property of Taylorcraft Aviation Corporation, debtor, superior to that of the United States for taxes. The facts are not disputed and as found by the referee are in substance as follows: November 8, 1946, the debtor fil
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946-02-11 · Published · cited 4× · 193 S.W.2d 588; 354 Mo. 1098; 1946 Mo. LEXIS 396
On December 30, 1944, Judge Ridge, Presiding Judge and Judge of Division Six of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, sustained separate demurrers filed by the various defendants to plaintiffs' fifth amended petition on the ground of misjoinder of *Page 1125 parties plaintiff and, finding that a third petition of plaintiffs' had been found insufficient on said ground, dismissed the petition and rendered judgment against plaintiffs for treble costs under Se
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948-06-01 · Published · cited 21× · 168 F.2d 808
168 F.2d 808 (1948) In re TAYLORCRAFT AVIATION CORPORATION. UNITED STATES v. MARTIN FIREPROOFING CORPORATION. No. 10604. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 1, 1948. Fred E. Youngman, of Washington, D. C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Sewall Key, A. F. Prescott and Fred E. Youngman, all of Washington, D. C., and Don C. Miller and Francis B. Kavanagh, both of C