Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lakewood Engineering & Mfg. Co., Inc.”
459 B.R. 306 (2011) In re LAKEWOOD ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Debtor. Gregg Szilagyi, not individually but as Trustee of Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Sunbeam Products, Inc. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions, Plaintiff, v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, Scott Jackson and Chungkin Yee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09 B 5320. Adversary No. 09 A 341. United
Cooper v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Co.public domain
874 F.Supp. 947 (1994) Debra COOPER, Trustee for the Surviving Next of Kin of Jeremy and Joe Cooper, Deceased; and Debra Cooper, Trustee for the Surviving Next of Kin of Jarrod James Cooper, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. LAKEWOOD ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, McMillan Manufacturing Company, and W.W. Grainger, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 3-92-363. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Div
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
136 Nev., Advance Opinion 72 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75022 Appellant, vs. VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., Respondent. MDB TRUCKING, LLC, No. 75319 FILE Appellant,
Jeannine Presley v. Lakewood Engineering and Mfg.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3846 ___________ Jeannine Presley, Individually and * as Personal Representative of the * Estate of George Presley, Deceased; * Shelter Insurance Company, as * Subrogee of Jeannine Presley and * George Presley,
Usher v. Lakewood Engineering & Mfg. Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Linda Usher (“Usher”) has moved for issuance of a protective order against one aspect of the discovery proposed to be instituted, by Lakewood Engineering & Mfg. Co. (“Lakewood”) in this employment discrimination case brought by Usher against her ex-employer Lakewood. More precisely, Lakewood seeks to conduct a battery of psychological
553 F.3d 638 (2009) Jeannine PRESLEY, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of George Presley, Deceased; Shelter Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Jeannine Presley and George Presley, Appellants, v. LAKEWOOD ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellee. No. 07-3846. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 22, 2008.
Christel v. EB Engineering, Inc.public domain
TAUBMAN, J. Plaintiffs, Gary Christel, Marínela Chris-tel, Theron Merrill, Evangeline Christel, and Conrad Christel (Christels), appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, EB Engineering, Inc., d/b/a Scott Cox & Associates, Inc., and William H. Mitzelfeld (collectively Cox). We affirm. The Christels reside in a house that is connected to the City of Boulder’s sewer s
*496ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL IN PART GARY S. AUSTIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction On July 30, 2009, Global Ampersand, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Global”) filed the instant Motion to Compel and an Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time to Hear the Motion. (Docs. 72, 74, and 76). The Court granted the Pla
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.public domain
ORDER RE: SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Samsung moves for relief from portions of Magistrate Judge Grewal’s July 24, 2012 Order Granting-in-Part Apple’s Motion for an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction. See
One Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co.public domain
[Cite as One Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2024-Ohio-1601.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT One Church, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-457 v. : (C.P.C. No. 21CV-1055) Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Comp
Byrne Mfg. Co. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co.public domain
87 F.2d 783 (1937) BYRNE MFG. CO. v. AMERICAN FLANGE & MFG. CO., Inc. No. 7242. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. January 12, 1937. J. F. Oberlin and George B. Pitts, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant. George L. Wilkinson, of Chicago, Ill. (Harry W. Lindsey, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., James H. Hayes, of New York City, Rector, Hibben, Davis & M
Opinion issued December 29, 2011. In The Court of Appeals For The<
Kathleen McCarthy v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.public domain
OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Kathleen McCarthy filed suit against Ameritech Publishing, Inc. (API) and AT & T, her former employers, to recover damages for claims related to the August 2008 termination of her employment. The merits of those claims are the subject of a separate appeal. This appeal concerns a litigation dispute that aros
E. Ohio Gas Co. v. Youngstownpublic domain
[Cite as E. Ohio Gas Co. v. Youngstown, 2020-Ohio-731.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY EAST OHIO GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN,
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1849 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 06/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IDEKER FARMS, INC., ROBERT ADKINS, JR., ROBERT ADKINS, SR., ESTATE OF BETTY AD- KINS, ESTATE OF ROBERT ADKINS, SR., KEN AD- KINS, DBA ROBERT ADKINS & SONS PARTNERSHIP, GERALD SCHNEIDER, DBA BUF- FALO HOLLOW FARMS, INC., Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants LYNN BINDER, ELAINE BINDER, TODD BINDER,