Cases

Weston v Staten Is. Care Ctr., LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00207) Weston v Staten Is. Care Ctr., LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00207 Decided on January 17, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Before the Court is [12] plaintiffs’ motion for partial default judgment and [17] two of the three defendants’ motion to set aside [11] the Clerk’s entry of default against them. Plaintiffs, an employee benefit plan and its trustees, brought this action to recover con

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1260The Federal False Claims Act and the Florida False Claims Act permit the federal government and the state government, respectively, acting through a relator, to recover damages for a material and knowing misrepresentation to the government about a product or service sold to the government

Case: 18-10500 Date Filed: 06/25/2020 Page: 1 of 44 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10500 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv-01303-SDM-T

486 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2007) Michael BUTLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADOPTION MEDIA, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. C 04-0135 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2007. *1023 *1024 Courtney Grant Joslin, Katherine K. Ikeda, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Paul Stephan

09/18/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 10, 2017 Session SHAY SIMPSON, ET AL. v. NATIONAL FITNESS CENTER, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-291-15 Deborah C. Stevens, Judge No. E2017-00018-COA-R3-CV This

Roizman v Stromer (2020 NY Slip Op 04196) Roizman v Stromer 2020 NY Slip Op 04196 Decided on July 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR„ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) and Defendants’ Response (Doe. 30); (2) Defendants’ First Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24), Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 29), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. 34);- and (3) Defendants’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) and Plaint

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Daniele v Pain Mgt. Ctr. of Long Is. (2019 NY Slip Op 00093) Daniele v Pain Mgt. Ctr. of Long Is. 2019 NY Slip Op 00093 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Re

LANCE M. AFRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *757Robert Hicks ("Hicks") alleges that he was injured during a personnel basket transfer on March 20, 2016 between the MAD DOG, an offshore platform on the Outer Continental Shelf ("OCS") that is owned and operated by BP Exploration and Production Inc. ("BP Exploration"), and the OCSV SIEM STINGRA

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHNSON, Senior District Judge: Plaintiff Musya Korotkova (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendant United States of America (“United States”) pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In short, in this slip-and-fall case, the plaintiff alleges she slipped and fell on the ice, while skat

Filed 4/26/23; Certified for Publication 5/18/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RANDY’S TRUCKING, INC., et al., F084849 Petitioners, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-20-100982) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Presently before the court are several motions for summary judgment related to an administrative review of the issuance of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediment (“TMDL”, “Bay TMDL”, or “Final TMDL”). Plaintiffs filed a joint motion for summary judgment (Doc. 95) and Defendant United States Environmental Protec

REARDON, J. *261Plaintiffs brought this action on behalf of California dentists who purchased the Cavitron ultrasonic scaler (Cavitron) for use during oral surgical procedures. Plaintiffs sued defendant Dentsply International, Inc. (Dentsply)-the manufacturer and marketer of the Cavitron-asserting causes of action under the Unfair Competition L

Filed 1/10/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR PATRICIA A. MURRAY DENTAL CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A141377 v. (City & County of San Francisco DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Super. Ct. No. CGC-0

[Cite as Hoffs v. Batman, 2017-Ohio-9309.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY REBECCA HOFFS : : Plaintiff-Appellant/ : C.A. CASE NO. 2017-CA-5 Cross-Appellee :

916 So.2d 498 (2005) Charles DUCHAMP, et ux. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. No. 2005-339. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 2, 2005. *499 James A. Blanco, Mitchell & Blanco, LLC, Lake Charles, LA, for Defendants/Appellants, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Ernest Lo

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs. 63 & 64) CHRISTINA REISS, District Judge. This matter came before the court for review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations filed on June 28, 2010 (Doc. 63 & 64). *391The Magistrate Judge recommended