Cases

820 F.Supp.2d 289 (2011) Adela JOUBERT-VAZQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Zoime ALVAREZ-RUBIO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 11-1194 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 24, 2011. *292 Jorge Martinez-Luciano, M.L. & R.E. Law Firm, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Angel E. Rotger-Sabat, Ivonne Cruz-Ser

812 F.Supp.2d 110 (2011) Edwin TOLEDO-COLON, Plaintiff, v. Commonwealth of PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 10-2217 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 21, 2011. *114 Carlos Rafael Rodriguez-Garcia, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Lumy Mangual-Mangual, P.R. Department of Justice-Federal Li

(2007) Milagros AYALA-GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. Pedro A. TOLEDO-DAVILA, Superintendent of Police of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Dr. Luis A. Quinones-Esquilin, Defendants. Civil No. 06-1650 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 31, 2007. OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court ar

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to consider the claims of two dairy farmers, each convicted of milk adulteration, who, along with their wives, now assert that the relevant Puerto Rico regulatory agency’s decision to cancel their milk production quotas deprived them of valuable property in violation of the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution. ■ U.S. Const. a

620 F.Supp.2d 239 (2009) Marilyn ROSA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOSPITAL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and Sociedad Espanola de Auxilio Mutuo y Beneficiencia, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-2350 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2009. *240 Doris Quinones-Tridas, Luisa Velazquez-Aparicio, Quinones

683 F.Supp.2d 177 (2010) Dalix M. JIMENEZ-GONZALEZ, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. Zoime ALVAREZ-RUBIO, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 09-1656 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 8, 2010. *179 Eduardo A. Vera-Ramirez, Eileen Landron-Guardiola, Luis A. Rodriguez-Munoz, Landron & Vera LLP, Guaynabo, PR, for

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1080 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

815 F.2d 725 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1063 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael MORENO MORALES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Angel PEREZ CASILLAS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jaime QUILES HERNANDEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael TORRES MARRERO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STA

El Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. J — 4 Marco conceptual aeontologico Este caso es único en el ámbito de nuestra jurisdicción disciplinaria. No sólo porque descorre el velo en torno a la conducta antiética de abogados en su función de fiscales, sino porque pone de manifiesto cómo la fortaleza o debilidad de las institucione

MR. Justice Cordova Davila delivered the opinion of the Court. The Central Eureka, lessee of a rural property of seventy-nine acres (cuerdas) described in the complaint, alleges that the defendant and appellee is the owner of an adjoining property which is also described in the complaint; that said defendant and appellee in his capacity as vice-president of the Central Eureka and as field supervisor of said C

Mr. Chief Justice Negrón Fernández delivered the opinion of the Court. Miguel Francisco was the owner of a two-story concrete building with basement and garage, known as Edificio Rosales, situated in the intersection of Fernández Juncos and Ponce de León Avenues, in Martín Peña, Santurce. He had leased it to Conchita de Goenaga for the sum of $200 a month, for a five-year term which expired on December 1, 1944

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: Aprobación del Libro de Instrucciones al Jurado; Agradecimiento al Comité 2022 TSPR 33 para la Revisión del Manual de Instrucciones al Jurado; designación 208 DPR _____ de miembros del Comité Asesor Permanente de Instrucciones al Jurado Número del Caso: EC-2022-01 Fecha: 25 de marzo de 2022 Materia: Resolución del Tribunal. Este documento constituye un documento oficial del Tribunal Supremo q