⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “LUIS AGOSTO NUNEZ”

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007-08-30 · Published · cited 5× · 509 F. Supp. 2d 137; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64394; 2007 WL 2493892
509 F.Supp.2d 137 (2007) Jesus SANCHEZ-NUNEZ, et al, Plaintiffs v. PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-1658(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 30, 2007. *138 *139 *140
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-07-10 · Published · cited 8× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 240
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants Triple-S Vida- Inc. (“Triple-S Vida”), Triple-S Insurance. Agency (“Triple-S Insurance”) and Triple-S Management Corporations (“Triple-S Management”) (collectively “defendants’O’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”). (Docket No. 56.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summa
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008-03-12 · Published · cited 260× · 520 F.3d 26; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5264; 2008 WL 650665
520 F.3d 26 (2008) Félix PÉREZ-ACEVEDO; Iris Yolanda-Quiñones; Conjugal Partnership Pérez-Quiñones, d/b/a Don Manuel Poultry Farm, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Luis RIVERO-CUBANO; Yasenia Figueroa-Guzmán; X and Y, Defendants, Appellees, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Representing the Agriculture Department, Defendant. No. 06-2633. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007-10-25 · Published · cited 0× · 525 F. Supp. 2d 248; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88759; 2007 WL 4226890
525 F.Supp.2d 248 (2007) Nancy JURADO SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Miguel PEREIRA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-1293 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 25, 2007. *249 *250 Jorge M. Izquierdo-San-Miguel, Izquierdo-San Miguel Law Office, Roberto Marquez-Sanchez,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-10-17 · Published · cited 18× · 426 F.3d 422; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22326; 2005 WL 2623105
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to consider the claims of two dairy farmers, each convicted of milk adulteration, who, along with their wives, now assert that the relevant Puerto Rico regulatory agency’s decision to cancel their milk production quotas deprived them of valuable property in violation of the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution. ■ U.S. Const. a
Gutierrez v. Molinapublic domain
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006-09-05 · Published · cited 1× · 447 F. Supp. 2d 168; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62763; 2006 WL 2529593
447 F.Supp.2d 168 (2006) Enid Marrero GUTIERREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Esperanza MOLINA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1256 (JAG)(JA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 5, 2006. *169 *170 Liz M. Cruz-Jimenez, Lixandra Osorio-Felix, Nicolas Nogueras Law Offices, San Ju
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2025-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO EN EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL WILLIE LOUBRIEL Apelación VÉLEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009-02-17 · Published · cited 3× · 599 F. Supp. 2d 127; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11470; 2009 WL 414652
599 F.Supp.2d 127 (2009) Ivonne MONFORT-RODRÍGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cesar A. REY-HERNÁNDEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1276 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 17, 2009. *130 Jesus M. Hernandez-Sanchez, Hernandez Sanchez Law Firm, Raul Barrera-Morales, Raul Barrera Morales Law Office, San Jua
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007-08-28 · Published · cited 5× · 508 F. Supp. 2d 164; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63646; 2007 WL 2421787
508 F.Supp.2d 164 (2007) EDUCADORES PUERTORRIQUEÑOS, et al. v. Hon. Cesar REY HERNANDEZ, et al. Civil No. 03-2304 (RLA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 28, 2007. *165 *166 *167 *168
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999-09-30 · Published · cited 5× · 74 F. Supp. 2d 127; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17256; 1999 WL 1011931
74 F.Supp.2d 127 (1999) Nereida Morales GUADARRAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD), et al., Defendants. No. 99-1557 DRD. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 30, 1999. *128 *129 *130
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988-09-30 · Published · cited 66× · 858 F.2d 40; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14022; 1988 WL 105475
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. This interlocutory appeal is from an action commenced in January 1985 by the plaintiff, Richard Feliciano Angulo, in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), against defendants, Hector Rivera Cruz, the Secretary of Justice for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and Luis A. Feliciano, the C
State v. Diarpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2008-12-10 · Published · cited 14× · 120 Ohio St. 3d 460; 900 N.E.2d 565
O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} On the morning of August 27, 2003, a fire seriously damaged the Lorain, Ohio home of defendant-appellant, Nicole Diar. The body of her four-year-old son, Jacob Diar, was found in the bedroom. Subsequent investigation determined that gasoline was used to start the fire and that Jacob had been killed before the fire began. {¶ 2} Diar was convicted of the aggravated murder of Jacob and was s
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990-04-30 · Published · cited 747× · 903 F.2d 49; 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1108; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6793; 1990 WL 52721
SELYA, Circuit Judge. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), plaintiff-appellant Jorge Correa-Martinez (Cor-rea) sued three jurists in federal district court. Asking that the judges be judged, Correa-Martinez alleged that he had been forced to resign from the judicial branch of Puerto Rico’s government in violation of his due process and first amendment rights. The district court dis