Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01005-SCT E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. GLEN STRONG AND CONNIE STRONG DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOHN G. CORLEW DEBORAH DEROCHE KUCHLER

KITCHENS, Justice, dissenting. ¶ 18. I fully join Justice King’s dissent. He correctly identifies the issue on appeal: whether the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence of causation. Despite criticism that the King opinion “does not apply any legal standard to the evidence,” the dissent clearly addresses the statute’s requirement that “[t]he defective and unreasonably dangerous condition of the product proxim

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. Appellants, PremierTox, Inc. and Prem-ierTox 2.0 (collectively referred to as “PremierTox”) appeal from the issuance of a writ of prohibition by the Court of Appeals. Appellees are Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc. (Kentucky Spirit); Cen-tene Corporation; and Jean Rush.1 PremierTox commenced the underlying action in the Ru

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. This is an appeal from an opinion of the Court of Appeals reversing a circuit court’s writ of prohibition of a district court order requiring the Commonwealth to produce the complaining witness (the arresting police officer), at a pretrial conference for an interview. We opine that the issuance of the writ was proper. In February 2008, Angela Pete

705 N.E.2d 938 (1999) 302 Ill. App.3d 236 235 Ill.Dec. 755 LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, n/k/a La Salle National Bank, N.A., as Trustee, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. Carlyn J. MALIK, Indiv., et al., Defendants and Counterplaintiffs (Carlyn J. Malik et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees; Kiannosh Jafari et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees; Swissler Brothers Plumbing, Inc.

January 20, 1999 No. 2--98--0028 _________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Remand, filed July 24, 2013 (Doc. 10)(“Motion to Remand”). The Court held a hearing on November 14, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Safeway Insurance Company has established that Plaintiff Betty Ullman’s claims exceed the jurisdictional minimum f

418 F.Supp.2d 1052 (2006) Stanley YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. NAKOMA GOLF CLUB and James Grasse, Defendants. No. 05-C-174-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. January 31, 2006. *1053 *1054 Willie J. Nunnery, for Plaintiff. Stephen M. Compton, Thorpe, Compton & Christian, S.C.,

968 So.2d 410 (2007) E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. Glen STRONG and Connie Strong. No. 2006-CA-01005-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 18, 2007. *412 John G. Corlew, Deborah Deroche Kuchler, Robert D. Gholson, attorneys for appellant. Alben N. Hopkins, Allen M. Stewart, James D. Piel, Stephanie Brooks Lesme

124 F.Supp.2d 967 (2000) Richard EIZENGA, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. Civil Action Nos. 99-2572, 99-2672, 99-2753, 99-2601, 99-2687, 99-2773, 99-2663, 99-2716, 99-2858, 99-2864, 99-2915, 99-2888, 99-3043, 99-2891, 99-3084. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 6, 2000.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00025-CV 7017794 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS