Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY”
Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Lopezpublic domain
21 S.W.3d 358 (2000) TEXAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Appellant, v. Lucas LOPEZ, Appellee. No. 04-98-00338-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 12, 2000. Rehearing Overruled February 2, 2000. *360 David L Brenner, Kristin L. Gustavson, Burns, Anderson, Jury & Brenner, L.L.P., Austin,
FiLED IN 5TH COURT OF APPEALS I5 fPR 2g PH g: gO CAUSE NO. QS-14-O151O-CV LISA &‘STZ. CIR< IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS TRENTS. GRIFFIN Appellant, V. AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY Appellee. On appeal from the
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Companypublic domain
322 F.3d 942 UNITED PHOSPHORUS, LTD., an Indian corporation; Shroff's United Chemicals, Ltd., an Indian corporation; and J.C. Miller & Associates, Incorporated, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ANGUS CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Angus Chemie GmbH, a German corporation; the Estate of Freeman Hughes through its representative Yvonne Hughes; Ollie W. Chandler; Lowell Pals; Gary W. Granzow; D.B. Gupta; and Lupin
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNT
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Ap
GEE, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (“OSHRC” or “the Commission”), upholding the ruling of an administrative law judge (“AD”) against Smith Steel Casting Co., Inc. (“Smith”) for failure to comply with OSHA standards codified in 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.134 and 910.10
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.public domain
Justice WILLETT, joined by Justice LEHRMANN, concurring. Litigants in our adversarial system are hard-wired for certitude, adept at insisting the law “clearly” or “plainly” favors their side or, as here, labeling the controlling analysis “straightforward and simple.” If only. Today’s case is both complex and consequential, and fiendishly so. The facts are compelling; the law is unclear; and the stakes are h
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF No. 24-1972 CALIFORNIA, acting by and D.C. No. through Los Angeles County Counsel 2:23-cv-08570- Dawyn R. Harrison, SPG-PD Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OPINION EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.; ESI MAIL PHARMAC
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WI-FI ONE, LLC, Appellant v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellee JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Inter
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM. ORDER The en banc oral argument in this case is scheduled for May 4, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 201. Each side will have 30 minutes for a total argument time of one hour. The parties shall notify the court by ECF by April 14, 2017 of the names of counsel who will present oral argument.
Jones v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.public domain
OPINION WOOD, Judge. Young and Jones received permanent implants of radioactive 1-125 (Iodine-125) in the treatment of cancer of the prostate. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not disputed that they received excessive radiation, and the excessive radiation caused the injuries. This appeal involves only the claims against 3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufactu
Burns v. Astruepublic domain
Associate Chief Justice NEHRING, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION 11 In this case we answer a question of Utah law certified to us by the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The question is: "Is a signed agreement to donate preserved sperm to the donor's wife in the event of his death sufficient to constitute 'eonsent[ ] in a record to being the 'parent' of a child con
National Claims Negotiators LLC v. Juan Guerrapublic domain
AFFIRMED; and Opinion Filed March 31, 2020 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00495-CV NATIONAL CLAIMS NEGOTIATORS LLC, Appellant V. JUAN GUERRA, AMANDA CARDENAS, CESAR QUINONES, FERNANDO MARIN, KEVIN CLAY, BARRY NIX, SANDRA NIX, JUAN DELTORO, GLEN MOORE, GAIL MOORE, ESMERELDA HERNA
Kimesha Williams v. District Council of Madison Inc.public domain
2021 WI App 62 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP1329 Complete Title of Case: KIMESHA WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MADISON INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Opinion Filed: July 29, 2021 Or
Rosado-Montes v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the defendants’ motion to dismiss (Docket # 6), the plaintiffs opposition thereto (Docket # 9), and the defendants’ reply. Docket # 14. After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, the defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Factual and Procedural Background This
Geffen v. General Electric Co.public domain
575 F.Supp.2d 865 (2008) Priscilla GEFFEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1:08-GD-50212. CD. No. 2:08-CV-1110-SGL. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 12, 2008. *866 Christina A. L. Fountain, Jason Edward Ochs, Ramon Rossi LopezLopez McHugh, Newport Be
Adan G. Adame v. Glendale Opticalpublic domain
Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00847-CV ——————————— ADAN G. ADAME, ROBERT H. ARISPE, HARVEY EDWARD ARNOLD, HERMON HARVEY ARNOLD, LUCIANO BARRIENTEZ, HOMER L. BATCHELOR, TOMAS BENITEZ, DELBERT RAY BLUNDELL, MELVIN BRION
Madelux International, Inc. v. Barama Co.public domain
364 F.Supp.2d 68 (2005) MADELUX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. BARAMA CO. LTD., et al., Defendants No. CIV.01-1862(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 15, 2005. *69 Freddie Perez-Gonzalez, Freddie Perez Gonzalez & Assoc. PSC, Luis A. Vargas-Lopez, Freddie Perez Gonzalez & Assoc. PSC, San Juan,
John Hays v. HCA Holdings, Incorporatedpublic domain
Case: 15-51002 Document: 00513698537 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-51002 FILED September 29, 2016