Cases

724 F.Supp.2d 447 (2010) LOCAL NO. 38 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 3016(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 19, 2010. *450 Beth A. Kaswan, Esq., Thomas

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND A PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF Nos. 87, 88) Michael J. Seng, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Irigaray Dairy (“Irigaray”), Charles Van Der Kooi Dairy (“Van Der Kooi”), Henry Jongsma & Son Dairy (“Jongsma”), and Cow-West North Star Dairy (“Cow-West”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) ar

98 F.Supp.2d 265 (2000) I.B.E.W LOCAL NO. 910 WELFARE, ANNUITY, AND PENSION FUNDS, by John LOVE, as Fund Manager; the Watertown Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund, by Terry Henry, as Chairman; National Electrical Benefit Fund, by John Grau and Jack Moore, as Trustees; and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 910, by George Intschert, as Business Manager, Plaintiffs, v. DEXELECTRICS, INC., Defendant.<

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced action, seeking damages and a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 57, that it has an enforceable labor contract1 with Defendant International Union of Operating Engineers (“IUOE”), Local 450 (“Local 450”) and that Loca

618 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2009) Peter MARCEAU, Jon Bodine, Rhonda McKinney, Brian Pine, Kathryn Smith, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local 1269, Dex Media, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Karen Ortega-Matson, and Philip Wheeler, Defendants. Case No. CV 05-2874-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2009.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Appellants, individual members of Alaskan Local 1547 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW or International) appeal from the district court’s order1 dismissing their claims for injunc-tive and declaratory relief under § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA) and §§ 101, 102, 105, 501 and 609 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclo

788 F.Supp.2d 609 (2011) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD of ELECTRICAL WORKERS Local 697 Pension Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. LIMITED BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-1008. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 29, 2011. *613 Brian K. Murph

463 F.Supp. 388 (1978) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL NO. 122, Defendant. Civ. A. No. M-74-3. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 24, 1978. *389 *390 *391

129 F.Supp.2d 176 (2001) T. Edward VAIL, Plaintiff, v. PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS AND APPRENTICES LOCAL NUMBER 112 PENSION FUND, Defendant. No. 99-CV-1878. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 22, 2001. Levene, Goulding & Thompson, LLP, Binghamton, NY (John H. Hartman, of counsel), for plaintiff. Blitman & King, LLP, Syracuse, NY (Jennifer

*273T. G. Kavanagh, C. J. (concurring). I have signed Justice Levin’s opinion because I am satisfied that he has correctly stated the law. I write separately to emphasize the observation he makes. At least as long as the law prohibiting public employees from striking is maintained, some form of

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Rozay’s Transfer, an employer, brought this action against Teamsters Local 208 (union) for fraudulently inducing Rozay’s Transfer to execute a collective bargaining agreement. Following a bench trial, the district court found for Rozay’s Transfer and granted its prayer for rescission of the collective bargaining agreement (agreement) and for indemnifica

729 F.Supp. 1199 (1990) IMPERIAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Guy Cleveland, and D.J. Electric, Plaintiffs, v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 96; International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 701; DuPage County Building and Construction Trades Council, Defendants. No. 86 C 5715. United States District C

*426Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, and VI, and an opinion with respect to Parts IV, V, and VII in which Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens join. In 1975, petitioners were found guilty of engaging in a pattern and practice of discrimination a

292 F.Supp. 413 (1968) Anderson L. DOBBINS, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 212, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America by Ramsey CLARK, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 212, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 6421, 6473. United States District Court S. D. Ohio, W. D. September 12,

664 F.2d 435 27 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 913,27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,328UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.The CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, et al., Defendants-Appellees,v.FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, CITY OF MIAMI LODGE NO. 20,Kenneth R. Harrison, President, and the MiamiPolice Benevolent Association,Defendants-Appellants. No. 77-1856. United States Court of Ap

587 F.2d 1379 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2366, 85 Lab.Cas. P 11,063 John STELLING, Forrest Darby, Robert McDaniel, and Terry C.Hix, Plaintiffs- Appellants,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNIONNUMBER 1547, and the International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers, I. M. Waldrop, Jr., W. L. Vinson, Charles H.Pillard, and Wesley I. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.INTERNATIONAL BROTHER

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} In this appeal, numbered WD-03-28, the Wood County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to appellee, Vaughn Industries, Inc. ("Vaughn") and denied the motion of appellant, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 8 ("IBEW") for summary judgment. In a second appeal, numbered {¶ 2} WD-03-048, Vaughn claims th

Handwork, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} In this appeal, No. WD-03-28, the Wood County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to appellee, Vaughn Industries, Inc. (“Vaughn”), and denied the motion of appellant, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 8 (“IBEW”) for summary judgment. {¶ 2} In a second appeal, No. WD-03-048, Vaughn claims that the trial court abused its discretion

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Richard W. Berg v. Hon. Christopher J. Christie (A-71/72-14) (074612) Argued March 14, 2016 – Decided June

454 B.R. 285 (2011) SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re Bernard L. Madoff, Debtor. Adversary No. 08-01789 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 28, 2011. *288 Baker & Hostetler LLP, By: David Sheehan, Seanna R. Brown,