Cases

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge LEWIS joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London brought this suit against Dr. Max Harry Cohen, a general surgeon, and Max Harry Cohen, M.D., Chtd., the corporate entity under which his practice operated (co

MEMORANDUM ■ EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge This is a case of alleged unlawful discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619. Plaintiff Dolores Lloyd (“Plaintiff’)) proceeding pro se, brings this action against Presby’s Inspired Life (“Pres-by’s”), the owner of the property where Plaintiff formerly resided, and the property manager of the property, Fatim

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Drayton’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

DECISION In these consolidated cases, W. Bart Lloyd ("Mr. Lloyd") appeals from a September 1, 2006 decision of the Zoning Board of Review of the City of Newport ("Zoning Board" or "Board"), denying his application for a special use permit, and Mr. Lloyd and Elizabeth Lloyd (collectively "Lloyds") appeal from a November 28, 2007 decision of the Zoning Board, granting a special use permit to Mark and Donna Bardorf (collect

566 F.3d 341 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Ashbert S. LLOYD, Jr., Appellant. No. 08-2513. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 21, 2009. Filed: May 27, 2009. *342 Jason T. Cohen [Argued], Office of United States Attorney, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas USVI, Attorney for Appellee.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff-insurers seek, inter alia, a determination as to whether a series of liability insurance policies, issued to defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) more than three decades ago, obligate the plaintiff-insurers to reimburse Amtrak for costs incurred in connection

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION MBIA, Inc. (“MBIA”) brings this diversity action against certain underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Lloyd’s”), Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”), and Wurttembergische Versicherung AG (“WurttVers”) (collectively, known as the “Underwriters”) for breach of contract and declaratory judgment.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RULE 60 MOTION LLOYD, United States Magistrate Judge. On July 13, 2004, this court heard defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 to set aside entry of default. Plaintiff opposed the motion. Having consider the papers submitted by the parties and the arguments of counsel, the court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a co

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff-insurers seek, inter alia, a determination as to whether a series of liability *148insurance policies, issued to defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) more than three decades ago, obliga

In an action, inter alia, for the reformation of an insurance policy, the defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered December 3, 2014, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, wi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff London market insurance companies (“LMI”) seek to compel defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) to re-produce two documents used by LMI as deposition exhibits that Amtrak has since “clawed back” after asserting attorney-client privilege and work-product protections. For the following reasons, LMI’s motio

Grainger, J. We address the most recent chapter in a fifteen year old consumer class action suit against Allmerica Financial Corporation and various corporate affiliates (Allmerica) alleging improper practices (so-called “vanishing premium” misrepresentations and related improprieties) in the sale of life insurance policies. *675Background. The

641 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2008) Ashley SPARKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-0477-WS-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 20, 2008. *1237 David G. Poston, Gary W. Stout, Walter Allen Blakeney, Enterprise, AL, for Plaintiffs. Laura C.

751 F.Supp.2d 876 (2010) Laura PENDERGEST-HOLT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON and Arch Specialty Insurance Co., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-3712. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 13, 2010. *878 Lee Howard Shidlofsky, Alan M. Cohen, Douglas Paul Skelley, V

600 F.3d 562 (2010) Laura PENDERGEST-HOLT; R. Allen Stanford; Gilbert Lopez, Jr.; Mark Kuhrt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON and Arch Specialty Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellants, *563 United Policyholders, Amicus Curiae. No. 10-20069. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 15, 2010.</

681 F.Supp.2d 816 (2010) Laura PENDERGEST-HOLT, R. ALLEN STANDFORD, GILBERTO LOPEZ, Jr., and Mark Kuhrt, Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON and Arch Specialty Insurance Companys, Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-3712. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 26, 2010. *818 Lee How

COHEN, J., INTRODUCTION On April 23, 2001, this court granted a non pros in favor of all defendants and against the plaintiff in this wrongful termination case. Rather than file post-verdict motions, the non-prevailing plaintiff appealed this court’s entry of a non pros to the Superior Court on May 24,2001. Thereupon this court ordered that the plaintiff file a concise statemen

44 Cal.Rptr.3d 284 (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 291 Jeanne Ruthann AKIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON etc., Defendant and Respondent. No. E038354. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. May 16, 2006. *285 Shernoff Bidart Darras, William M. Shernoff, Evangeline F. Ga

Cordy, J. After the plaintiff Allmerica Financial Corporation, along with its affiliated companies (together, Allmerica), settled a class action lawsuit alleging, inter alla, improper practices in the sale of its life insurance policies, it sought indemnification from its insurers. Allmerica’s primary insurer had participated in the settlement negotiations and agreed to pay its policy’s limit into the settlement fund. Allmerica a

Opinion of the Court SULLIVAN, Judge: On August 26, 1993, at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, appellant was tried by a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of attemptmg to commit an indecent act on CW, his stepdaughter; raping SW, his other stepdaughter; committing sodomy with SW (4 specifications); and committing mdecent acts with SW (2 specifications) and CW, in vio