Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL LIZARDO ANTONIO PÉREZ Apelación PÉREZ, su esposa NORMA IRIS procedente del FELICIANO NIEVES y la Tribunal de SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE Primera Instancia GANANCIALES compuesta por

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Because the record before us does not reflect that the Parole Commission or any Commissioner considered Marquez-Perez’s request for reconsideration of his parole date, we vacate the district court’s judgment, and remand for further proceedings. Some of the important facts on which the Commission based its decision to establish Marquez-Perez’s parole d

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendants Juan Laureano-Pérez (“Juan”), Jeffrey Cummings-Ávila (“Cummings”), and Christopher Laureano-Pérez (“Christopher”) 1 (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of various narcotics possession, firearm, and conspiracy charges arising out of their participation in an illicit drug organiz

599 F.3d 31 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel PÉREZ-MELÉNDEZ, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Ángel Rivera-Ríos, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 08-2225, 08-2226. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 3, 2009. Decided March 17, 2010. *32

OPINION PER CURIAM. Gerson Monterroso petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ final order of removal. For the reasons that follow, we will grant the petition for review and remand the matter for further proceedings before the Board. Monterroso, a native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States without inspection in 2001. He was placed in removal proceed

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered August 31, 2010, which, in this action alleging, inter alia, negligent supervision, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff student was injured during a lunchtime baske

949 F.2d 532 34 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 853 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Fabio RODRIGUEZ CORTES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Eduardo OCAMPO-HOYOS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Rafael PEREZ MARTINEZ, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 90-1921, 91-1055, 90-1977 and 90-1978. United States Court of Appeals,First Circ

455 F.3d 18 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Arsenio RODRÍGUEZ-ORTIZ, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Leonardo Santana-Rodríguez, a/k/a Viejo, Defendant, Appellant. No. 05-1350. No. 05-1351. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 8, 2006. Decided

[J-45-2024] [MO: Dougherty, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT LICELY JUAREZ VELASQUEZ, : No. 108 MAP 2023 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 2688 EDA

CYR, Senior Circuit Judge. Javier Rivera-Rivera (Rivera) appeals from a judgment of conviction for conspiracy to distribute drugs, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession or use of a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We affirm. I BACKGROUND In 2003, the Police of Puerto Rico (PO

OPINION PER CURIAM. Randolph Artis, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Fair-ton, New Jersey, appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We will affirm. Artis was employed by Federal Prison Industries (“UNICOR”)at FCI Fairton. In May 2007, after an investigation, Artis was charged with having been overpaid $197.60 for hours tha

386 F.Supp.2d 277 (2005) Eliezer WAHHAB, and Amehra Brown, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Officers Samuel Rushing, Shield # 6377 and David E. Martin, Shield # 88157, the Gallery at Fulton St., LLC, Top Potato Plus Corp., Theodore Priftakis, Individually and as Owner/Manager of Top Potato Plus Corp., Cannady Security Co., Henry Cannady, Individually and as Owner of Cannady Security Co., Security Guard Jovan Rouse, and Se

658 F.3d 117 (2011) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Peter MITRANO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-2482. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 7, 2011. Decided September 23, 2011. *118 Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, for appellant. Seth R. Aframe, Assistant United States A

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 24-1650, 24-1821 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SUNNA SEPETU and NAFIS QUAYE, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Samantha D. Elliot, U.S. District Judge]

509 F.3d 54 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael R. DEPPE, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1048. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted November 6, 2007. Decided December 11, 2007. *55 *56 Arza Feldman, Steven A. Feldman, and Feldman and Feldman

LYNCH, Chief Judge. Sadly, this court is once again addressing the legal aftermath of a small plane crash killing several people. It has been some years since we last had to decide such a case. See In re N-500L Cases, 691 F.2d 15 (1st Cir.1982); see also Fed. Express Corp. v. Rhode Island, 664 F.2d 830 (1st Cir.1981); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. United States, 561 F.2d 381 (1st Cir.1977). We affirm the en

783 F.Supp. 458 (1992) Juanita COTA, Claude D. Ralls, Joe Godoy, Rosemary Pacheco, Lucille C. Valdez, Berta Valenzuela, and Latin American Law Enforcement Association ("LALEA"), Plaintiffs, v. TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, City of Tucson, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; and the Civil Service of the City of Tucson, Defendants. Rudy MONTENEGRO, Intervenor, v. TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, City of Tucson, a political subdivision

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Carlos Burgos of one count of conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Mr. Burgos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and also claims that the district court erred in giving a “willful blindness” instruction. For the reasons set forth in the

[J-45-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. LICELY JUAREZ VELASQUEZ, : No. 108 MAP 2023 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the Superior

525 F.3d 505 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafal WANTUCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-3681. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 25, 2008. Decided May 1, 2008. *507 Charles E. Ex (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appelle