Cases

729 A.2d 21 (1999) 158 N.J. 211 NEW JERSEY STATE LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES; an organization of municipalities; Borough of Elmer, a municipal corporation; Township of Plainsboro, a municipal corporation; City of Paterson, a municipal corporation; George Ferensick, an individual; Absecon City; Alloway Township; Berkeley Heights Township; Berlin Borough; Bernards Township; Bernardsville Borough; Bogota Borough; Boonton Town; Branchbur

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

CRABTREE, J.T.C. This is a local property tax case wherein plaintiff seeks direct review of the 1991, 1992 and 1993 assessments on its property located at 112 Eisenhower Parkway, Livingston, New Jersey (Block 290, Lot 5). The assessments, the same for all years, were: *508Land $5,364,000 Improvements 40,94

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. In English v. Board of Education of Boonton, 301 F.3d 69, 81 (3d Cir.2002), this court held that the New Jersey statute providing for no more than one representative of a sending school district to participate on the receiving district’s board of education did not violat

312 F.3d 614 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG; Gregory Scott; Geraldine Feldman; Patricia Bowers; Robert J. Fulton, Jr., Beth Kovacs; Christine Ihling; Steven Jankoskiv.David LIVINGSTON, Somerset County Superintendent; William L. Librera*, State Commissioner of Education; the Board of Education of the Borough of Somerville, A Body Politic of the State of New JerseyBeth Kovacs; Christine Ihling; Steven Jankoskiv.D

690 F.Supp.2d 136 (2010) CITY OF NEWBURGH, Plaintiff, v. Mark SARNA, Sarna Enterprises, Inc., Mt. Airy/Aire Estates, Inc., New Windsor Development Co., LLC, and Drainage District # 6—Mt. Airy Estates (The Reserve), Town of New Windsor, New York, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 5117(CM)(LMS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 5, 2010.

235 N.J. Super. 298 (1989) 562 A.2d 239 JOHN SAVARESE, ET AL., AND OTHER PERSONS OR ENTITIES SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 2, 1989. Decided July 26, 1989.

102 N.J. Super. 512 (1968) 246 A.2d 178 THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN, BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK, MORRIS COUNTY, AND ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided August 1, 1968.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by WILENTZ, C.J. The question in this case is whether the defendant regional and community shopping centers must permit leafletting on societal issues. We hold that they must, subject to reasonable conditions set by them. Our ruling is limited to leafletting at such centers, and it applies nowhere else.1 It is based on our citizens’ right

541 F.2d 1007 POLAROID CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant,v.HERMANN FORWARDING CO., a New Jersey Corporation, Appellee.POLAROID CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant,v.KOWALSKY'S EXPRESS SERVICE, a New Jersey Corporation, Appellee. Nos. 75-2308, 75-2309. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued May 25, 1976.Decided

KUSKIN, J.T.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background........................................... 102 II. The Subject Property................................... 105 III. The Definition of Highest and Best Use................... 107 IV. Plaintiffs Proofs 109 *102V. Defendant’s P

294 F.Supp. 676 (1968) Elias LIVINGSTON and Vivienne Livingston, Plaintiffs, v. WEIS, VOISIN, CANNON, INC., a corporation of the State of Delaware; Philips, Appel & Walden, a partnership organized under the laws of the State of New York; James J. Philips, Barry Appel, and James A. Walden, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1106-67. United States District Court D. New Jersey, Civil Division. <

5 N.J. 65 (1950) 73 A.2d 916 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL FROM THE PROBATE OF THE ALLEGED WILL OF ROBERT LIVINGSTON, DECEASED. ELSIE LIVINGSTON GELLERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GERTRUDE A. LIVINGSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 27, 1950. Reargued May 22, 1950. Decided June 19, 1950.

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 24-2761 CHRISTOPHER G. MASSEY, APPELLANT v. BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD; ARVIN AMATORIO; HERNANDEZ RIVERA; ORA KORNBLUTH; RAFAEL MARTE; BUDDY DEAUNA _____________________________ Appeal from the U.S. District Court, D.N.J. Judge Jamel K. Semper, No. 2:20-cv-01942 Before: CH

SUNDAR, J.T.C. This is the court’s opinion in connection with the above captioned matters. Plaintiffs challenge the assessments imposed by defendant Township of Belleville (“Belleville”) upon property located at 86 Lavergne Street, designated as Block 2401, Lot 2 (“Subject”) for tax years 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The assessments for tax years 2008 through 2010 were as follows: Ijinil SUSM.000

775 A.2d 657 (2001) 341 N.J. Super. 580 TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 769 ASSOCIATES, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Maricusa Corp., a New Jersey Corporation; Local American Bank of Tulsa, a Federal Savings Bank; and American Cancer Society, New Jersey Division, Inc., Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey,

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

209 N.J. Super. 499 (1986) 507 A.2d 1194 PAUL ANASTASIO, MARVIN GREENMAN AND ORESTO ANASTASIO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND T/A BRIAR HILL VILLAS COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, JOSEPH BRENNAN, JR., JOSEPH ANTONUCCI, MARY LANNON, MARY ANDERSON, ALTON WILLIAMSON AND SAMUEL SPINA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRED W. LA BASTILLE AND JOSEPH BRENNAN, SR., DEFENDANTS.

Me. Chief Justice LansdeN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case was brought to enjoin the Railroad Commission, composed of Messrs. Enloe, Welch, and Hannah, from hearing an application filed by the receivers of the Memphis Street Railway Company, asking authority to increase the fare for passengers on its street cars in excess of five cents. The basis of the bill is that chapter 49, Acts of 1919, is unc

126 N.J. Super. 460 (1974) 315 A.2d 424 GREGORY FARRELL AND MARY FARRELL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; GEORGE C. PETERSEN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK; AND THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided January 31, 1974.<