Cases

EZELL, Judge. |, This appeal involves donations inter vi-vos made by Joyce Thompson to her caretaker, Linda Whaley. Camilla Farrar, as independent administratrix of Ms. Thompson’s succession, filed suit on behalf of the succession against Ms. Whaley for the return of funds and assets she claimed were improperly transferred to Ms. Whaley from Ms. Thompson. Mrs. Farrar is Ms. Thompson’s daughter. Ms. Whaley appeals the trial c

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINDA SENN, No. 21-35293 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-01814- HZ KYLE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant, ORDER and CITY OF PORTLAND; LARRY GRAHAM; JE

2023 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1728 & 2019AP2063 COMPLETE TITLE: In re: The Atrium of Racine, Inc., d/b/a The Atrium and Bay Pointe: Marilyn Casanova , member of Creditor Committee, Audrey J. Fox, member of Creditor Committee, Dr. Melvin Miritz, member of Creditor Co

2023 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1728 & 2019AP2063 COMPLETE TITLE: In re: The Atrium of Racine, Inc., d/b/a The Atrium and Bay Pointe: Marilyn Casanova , member of Creditor Committee, Audrey J. Fox, member of Creditor Committee, Dr. Melvin Miritz, member of Creditor Co

OPINION Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant Brinson Benefits, Inc. (“Brin-son”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding appellees Linda Hooper (“Ms. Hooper”), Sean Sendelbach (“Mr. Sendelbach”), and Holmes Murphy & Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) attorney’s fees pursuant to the Texas Theft Liability Act (“TTLA”) in its suit against

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-3731 LINDA T. and GENE A., as parents of, and on behalf of their minor son, WILLIAM A., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RICE LAKE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United Sta

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded and Opinion Filed September 28, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00105-CV UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant V. ELLEN S. VITETTA, Appellee

*365 MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Sheila Generette (“Genrette” or plaintiff) filed this action on November 23, 2011, on behalf of her minor son, (“M.S.”), seeking $10,814.37 in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in pursuing administrati

ACCEPTED 14-13-00604-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

881 S.W.2d 897 (1994) Jay Mahlon HILL and Linda Maria Lembo Hill, Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas, State. Nos. 2-92-353-CR, 2-92-354-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. July 28, 1994. *899 David L. Richards and Robert Ford, Fort Worth, for appellants. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Betty Marshall, Charles M. Mallin

337 F.Supp.2d 1135 (2004) LINDA T. and Gene A., as parents of, and on behalf of their minor son, WILLIAM A., Plaintiffs, v. RICE LAKE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. No. 03-C-628-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. September 21, 2004. Jeffrey Spitzer-Resnick, Madison, WI, for Plaintiffs. Joanne Harmon Curry, Lathrop & Clark, LLP, Madison, WI

Cook, J., concurring in the syllabus and concurring in part and dissenting in part in judgment. Although I concur in the syllabus of the majority’s opinion, my analysis differs and leads to different dispositions of the four cases. Like the majority, I believe that the passing of the sunset date found in R.C. 2151.353(F) does not divest the juvenile court of jurisdiction to enter a dispositional order. That

998 F.2d 922 21 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 357 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charles Phillip ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants,Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee,Kenneth J. Davis, Linda J. Davis, Leroy H. Moeller, AsPersonal Representative of the Estates of Adolph Hagstrom,Squire J. Kingston, Elizabeth Woods, Caroline Estelle,Lynnis H. McClain, Ted Masco, Anita K. Hailey, Earl

OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Congress and the Supreme Court have made it abundantly clear that the aim of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 “is not for the purpose of aiding lawyers. The purpose of th[e] bill is to aid civil rights.” 122 Cong. Rec. 33,314 (Sept. 29, 1976) (remarks of Sen. Kennedy); Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 115, 113 S.Ct. 566, 1

886 S.W.2d 492 (1994) Linda Katherine FARMER, Appellant, v. BEN E. KEITH COMPANY, Appellee. No. 2-93-216-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. October 19, 1994. Rehearing Overruled December 6, 1994. *493 Ken Wigginton, Ken Wigginton, P.C. & Associates, Wichita Falls, for appellant. William L. Lath

953 F.2d 1556 16 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1150 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charles Phillip ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants,Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee,Kenneth J. Davis, Linda J. Davis, Leroy H. Moeller, AsPersonal Representative of the Estates of Adolph Hagstrom,Squire J. Kingston, Elizabeth Woods, Caroline Estelle,Lynnis H. McClain, Ted Masco, Anita K. Hailey, Earl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JESSICA C. SMITH-HAYNIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-2824 (TSC) ) U

SYKES, Circuit Judge. In this case we review the denial of a claim for attorneys’ fees under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The district court denied the claim because although Linda T. and Gene A., parents of William A., prevailed in part in a state administrative agency hearing challenging certain aspects

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice. |,Appellants Barton Land Services, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of grantors of a mineral deed appeal the Van Burén County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, SEECO, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of the deed’s grantee. |?For reversal, appellants argue that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment a

People v Samuel (2021 NY Slip Op 00882) People v Samuel 2021 NY Slip Op 00882 Decided on February 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law