Cases

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-018-CV LARRY BARBER APPELLANT V.

CURETON, A.J. Husband’s estate appeals from the final order of the family court granting Wife a divorce, equitably dividing the parties’ property, and awarding alimony to Wife. Husband argues the family court erred in awarding Wife the benefit of his surviv- or’s benefit plans.1 We affirm. FACTS In 1996, after more than twenty years of marriage, the parties sep

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion of the court, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON, and Judges RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, WILKINS, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS joined. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judges ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Norwood W. Barber and his wife, Linda K. Barber, were convicted of launde

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of December 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Carpinello, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered September 9, 1996 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer. In this matrimonial action, commenced in June 1994, defendant sought leave in June 1996 to amend his answer pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) to implead plaintiffs parents and to add two counterclaims. The first

634 S.E.2d 706 (2006) Leon BARBER v. VISTARMS, INC. Record No. 052094. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 15, 2006. *708 David A. Temeles, Jr. (Temeles & Temeles, on brief), for appellant. Philip J. Harvey, Vienna (Linda M. Jackson, Varda Hussain, Venable LLP, on brief), for appellee. Present: All the Justices

PER CURIAM. Darren Barber appeals his habitual felony offender classification and resultant enhanced sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to sell, arguing that Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1995), does not permit such classification for this crime. We agree. In May 1996, Barber was charged with and convicted of the following offenses: (1) sale of cocaine and (2) possession of cocaine

799 P.2d 936 (1990) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Complainant, v. Paul Allen BARBER, Attorney-Respondent. No. 89SA498. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. October 29, 1990. Linda Donnelly, Disciplinary Counsel, Susan L. Fralick and Jay P.K. Kenney, Asst. *937 Disciplinary Counsels, Denver, for complainant. Paul Alle

People v Alfaro-Barber (2020 NY Slip Op 00606) People v Alfaro-Barber 2020 NY Slip Op 00606 Decided on January 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

OPINION This is a divorce case. Walter Wayne Barber, Petitioner-Appellee, filed this suit against Linda Sue Barber, Respondent-Appellant, alleging "no-fault" grounds for divorce. For convenience, the parties will sometimes be hereinafter referred to as "husband" and "wife." Wife answered husband's petition and sought and was granted a temporary restraining order against him. Thereafter, wife filed a cross-petition for divorce alleging adultery on the part of husband,

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Jean Dillon-Barber (“Dillon-Barber”) filed a nine-count complaint against the Regents of the University of Michigan, Susan Sheppard and Linda Creps, raising claims under Michigan law as well as under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She now appeals portions of the district cou

People v Alfaro-Barber (2020 NY Slip Op 00605) People v Alfaro-Barber 2020 NY Slip Op 00605 Decided on January 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JEFFREY BARBER, ADMINISTRATOR OF : No. 251 WAL 2021 THE ESTATE OF LINDA LEE JENKINS : A/K/A LINDA LEE BARBER, DECEASED : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

782 P.2d 1216 (1989) Stanley Louis SALL, a/k/a Stan Sall, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul BARBER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87CA1909. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. April 27, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1989. *1217 Stephen J. Sletta, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant. Retherford, Mullen, Recto

CitiMortgage, Inc. v Barber (2019 NY Slip Op 01559) CitiMortgage, Inc. v Barber 2019 NY Slip Op 01559 Decided on March 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT ZACHARY BARBER, JEFFREY BARBER, : No. 252 WAL 2021 ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF : LINDA LEE JENKINS A/K/A/ LINDA LEE : BARBER, DECEASED : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : v.

Petitioner appeals from a final decision of the Acting Director of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services that affirmed an Appeals Examiner's finding that petitioner is unavailable for full time employment and consequently ineligible for unemployment benefits under D.C. Code 1973, § 46-309(d) [now D.C. Code 1981, § 46-110(4)]. We address the issue whether the decision of the Acting Director is supported by substantial evidence. It is uncontradicted that peti

45 Cal.App.4th 652 (1996) ALBERT BARBER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LONG BEACH CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B093127. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. April 30, 1996. *653 COUNSEL James E. Trott and Larry J. Roberts for Plaintiff and Appellant.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 225 Donald Barber and Michael Moore, doing business as Quality Office Equipment (hereinafter referred to as "Moore")1, sued Canon, U.S.A., Inc. (hereinafter "Canon"), and its local dealer, Business Products Center, Inc. (hereinafter "BPC"), and Panasonic Communi