Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LIGE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS”
Lige v. Town of Montclairpublic domain
OUTLINE OE DISSENTING OPINION BY PASH MAN, J. The Issue P. 27 I The Remedial Power of the Division on Civil Rights 29 *27II The Propriety of Remedial Racial Quotas 34 ' A. The Remedial Racial Quota as an Unlimited Remedy 35 B. The Remedial Racial Quotas as Fostering an “Unqualified” Work Force 41
Verellen, A.C.J. ¶1 Seattle ordinances recognize genuine distinctions between nonconforming uses and the nonconforming structures associated with such uses. The core issue presented in this Land Use Petition Act1 (LUPA) *340appeal is whether the owner of legal nonconforming structures who, without required permits, demolishes those structures a
MAKAR, J. The issue in this case is whether an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) is statutorily authorized to modify an administrative order of child support retroactive to the date of service of the pleadings requesting modification. We hold that she is. I. The Department of Revenue initiated the underlying proceedings to establi
37 Wn. App. 662 (1984) 684 P.2d 77 FAMILY MEDICAL BUILDING, INC., Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL, Appellants. No. 5434-9-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. May 24, 1984. As amended by order July 16, 1984. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and William L
Inniss v. Aderholdpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Deborah Aderhold’s (“Ader-hold”), in her official capacity as the State Registrar and Director of Vital Records for the Georgia Department of Public Health, and Monica P. Fenton’s (“Fen-ton”), in her official capacity as Director of System Benefits for the Board of Regents of the University S
United States v. Eduardo Martinezpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-10848 Document: 122-1 Date Filed: 10/17/2025 Page: 1 of 50 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10848 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Fraternity v. Washington State Universitypublic domain
Kulik, J. ¶1 Washington State University (WSU) revoked its recognition of the Alpha Kappa Lambda Fraternity (AKL) for five years upon the Student Conduct Board’s (Conduct Board) finding that there had been illegal drug and alcohol use and disregard of WSU policies by AKL members. The Whitman County Superior Court upheld the decision and sanction. AKL appeals, arguing that the Conduct Board’s findings are not supported by substant
ALPHA KAPPA LAMBDA v. Wash. State Univ.public domain
216 P.3d 451 (2009) ALPHA KAPPA LAMBDA FRATERNITY, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, Respondent. No. 27374-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. September 17, 2009. *453 Timothy H. Esser, Esser & Sandberg PLLC, Pullman, WA, for Appellant. Danielle A. Hess, Washington State University Division, Pul
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Upon review of the defendants’ timely petition for rehearing, requesting that we reconsider that portion of our opinion granting the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees incident to this appeal, we agree that Dade-land is not yet entitled to attorneys’ fees under the applicable Florida statute. Accordingly, we vacate that portion of our opinion, see </
Goebel v. Dean & Associatespublic domain
91 F.Supp.2d 1268 (2000) Robert T. GOEBEL, Plaintiff, v. DEAN & ASSOCIATES, James D. Norton d/b/a Norton Print Systems, and Goss Graphics Systems, Inc., Defendants. No. C 97-4082-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 10, 2000. *1269 *1270 Timm W. Reid, Richa
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us for disposition from the Supreme Court of Florida, to which we certified five questions of Florida state law. See Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 383 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.2004). Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s responses to those questions, see Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul
Brodersen v. Sioux Valley Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
902 F.Supp. 931 (1995) Debbie BRODERSEN, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kendall E. Brodersen, Plaintiff, v. SIOUX VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Frank Allender, D.C.; Stephen Veit, M.D.; Stephen Veit, M.D., P.C.; Thomas Gary, M.D. and T.M. Gary, M.D., P.C., Defendants. No. C 93-4011. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. September 19, 1995.
United States v. Shukri Bakerpublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated case, we address the appeals of five individuals and one corporate defendant convicted of conspiracy and substantive offenses for providing material aid and support to a designated terrorist organization. The terrorist organization at issue is Hamas, which in 1995 was named a Specially Designated Terrorist by Presidential Executive Order
Barba Inv. Co. v. Walkerpublic domain
350 So.2d 509 (1977) BARBA INVESTMENT COMPANY, Arthur G. Henrichs and Lois G. Henrichs, Appellants, v. William D. WALKER et al., et Ux., Appellees. No. DD-26. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 22, 1977. Rehearing Denied October 25, 1977. *510 Thomas M. Brady, of Wells, Brown, Caton &a;
United States v. Shukri Bakerpublic domain
REVISED December 27, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-10560 December 7, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce
United States v. Mohammad El-Mezainpublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2011 No. 09-10560 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WISTRICH, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Before the court is defendant TRW, Inc.’s motion for a protective order regarding 29 inadvertently produced privileged documents.1 Specifically, defendant asks the court to direct plaintiff United States, its counsel, and counsel for r
United States v. Mohammad El-Mezainpublic domain
REVISED December 27, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-10560 December 7, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce
United States v. Shukri Abu Bakerpublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2011 No. 09-10560 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Mohammad El-Mezainpublic domain
REVISED December 27, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-10560 December 7, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce