Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LEWIS v. WILLIAMS & FUDGE, INC.”
Lewis v. Bloomsburg Mills, Inc.public domain
773 F.2d 561 38 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1692,40 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1615,38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,530, 3 Fed.R.Serv.3d 813 Sallie Pearl LEWIS, Bertha Banks, Annie F. Calhoun, GladysMcIntosh, Alice Rountree, Estella Ware, Jossie Jackson,Janie Belle Ashmore, individually and on behalf of all otherpersons similarly situated, Appellants,v.BLOOMSBURG MILLS, INC., a corporation, Appellee.
Lewis v. Bloomsburg Mills, Inc.public domain
JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment denying on the merits their individual and class claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging sex and race discrimination in hiring, job assignment, and promotion practices of the defendant, Bloomsburg Mills, Inc. (B
Fudge v. Cottle Countypublic domain
This appeal results from a plea of privilege proceeding in a tort action. Cottle County, Texas, appellee, sued Billy J. Fudge and Steere Tanklines, Inc., appellants, to recover damages caused to a county road bridge. Appellee alleged that Fudge, while in the course and scope of his employment with Steere, by negligently failing to follow instructions, drove a truck across appellee's bridge in Cottle County and damaged the same. Appellants filed pleas of privilege to be sued in
People v. Williamspublic domain
170 Cal.App.4th 587 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KENNETH DEMARIO WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. No. E042038. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. January 23, 2009. *594 Sally P. Brajevich, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown
Chappel v. Applied Control Systems Inc.public domain
WETTICK, J., Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is the subject of this opinion and order of court. The issue raised through the motion is whether a director has an absolute right to inspect corporate records and review other information involving the affairs of the corporation that is ordinarily available to directors of a corporation. Plaintiff’s complaint for declaratory judgment alleges that pl
Brendan Holbein v. Baxter Chrysler Jeep, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2892 ___________________________ Brendan Holbein lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. TAW Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Baxter Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Belle
Nabors v. CRST Malone, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants CRST Malone, Inc., and CRST International, Inc., (collectively “CRST” or Defendants) (DE 21). Plaintiff Dwayne Nabors filed a response in opposition (DE 23) and CRST filed a reply (DE 25). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED. BAC
People v. Williamspublic domain
16 Cal.4th 153 (1997) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BARRY GLENN WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S004720. Supreme Court of California. August 4, 1997. *176 COUNSEL Joan W. Howarth, Cathy Dreyfuss, under appointments by the Supreme Court, Mark Rosenbaum and Mark Silverstein for Defendant and Appellan
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc.public domain
16 A.3d 48 (2011) AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AIRGAS, INC., Peter McCausland, James W. Hovey, Paula A. Sneed, David M. Stout, Ellen C. Wolf, Lee M. Thomas and John C. van Roden, Jr., Defendants. In re Airgas Inc. Shareholder Litigation. Civil Action Nos. 5249-CC, 5256-CC. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: February 8, 2011. Decide
Financial SEC. Assur., Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.public domain
500 F.3d 1276 (2007) FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEPHENS, INC., Hayes, James & Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-14894. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 18, 2007. *1277 *1278 *1279
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.public domain
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: The primary issue presented in this case is whether an insurer of municipal bonds that becomes the owner of those bonds upon default has standing pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated *1260thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The plaintiff, Financial Sec
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: Stephens, Inc.’s (“Stephens”) petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. We VACATE our prior opinion in this case, 450 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir.2006), and substitute the following in its place. I. The plaintiff, Financial Security Assurance, Inc. (“FSA”), appeals the district court’s orders dismissing its Ru
Dillard, Judge. In this suit on an open account, Elizabeth Brennan Antiques & Interiors, Inc. (“Brennan”) sued Marion Hutcheson to recover payment for work done on Hutcheson’s property. Following Hutcheson’s failure to timely answer Brennan’s complaint after service by publication, the trial court entered a default judgment against her. Hutcheson now appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying her m
In re Erving Industries, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This case presents an issue of first impression in the First Circuit: whether a creditor’s supply of electricity to a debtor within the 20 days preceding the commencement of a bankruptcy case constitutes a sale of goods, entitling the creditor to a priority administrative expense claim under § 503(b)(9) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Mallet and Company Inc v. Ada Lacayopublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 20-3584, 21-1028, and 21-1029 _____________ MALLET AND COMPANY INC. v. ADA LACAYO; RUSSELL T. BUNDY ASSOCIATES, INC. d/b/a Bundy Baking Solutions; SYNOVA LLC; WILLIAM CHICK BOWERS Russell T. Bundy Associates, Inc. d/b/a Bundy Baking Solutions; Synova LL
J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Websterpublic domain
128 S.W.3d 223 (2003) J.M. DAVIDSON, INC. v. Chelsey J. WEBSTER. No. 01-0774. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 11, 2002. Decided December 31, 2003. *225 Myra K. Morris, Corpus Christi, Chester J. Makowski, Nathan Wesely, Houston, Royston Rayxor Vickery & Williams, for petitioner. Richard Daniel
In Re Airgate Pcs, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
389 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2005) In re AIRGATE PCS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. CIV.A. 1:02-CV-1291-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 29, 2005. *1361 *1362 David Lewis Balser, J. Timothy Mast, McKenna Long & Aldridge, Atlanta, GA, David W.T. Daniels, Erin E.
333 F.Supp.2d 239 (2004) CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, USA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. FREEDOM CARD, INC. and Urban Television Network, Inc., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, Third Party Defendants. No. CIV.A.03-217-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 26, 2004. *240<
Haskell v. Time, Inc.public domain
857 F.Supp. 1392 (1994) Eben W. HASKELL, Plaintiff, v. TIME, INC. and Time Warner, Inc., Defendants. Eben W. HASKELL, Plaintiff, v. PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, Defendant. Eben W. HASKELL, Plaintiff, v. The READER'S DIGEST ASSOC., INC., Defendant. Eben W. HASKELL, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY PUBLISHERS, Defendant. Nos. Civ-S-93-1165 DFL GGH through Civ-S-93-1167 DFL GGH and Civ-S-93-1313 D
Freeman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.public domain
846 F.Supp. 1109 (1993) Jacob FREEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. 85 Civ. 3302 (LBS) (KAR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 20, 1993. *1110 *1111 Jacob Freeman, plaintiff pro se. Bernard Brown, plaintiff pro se.