Cases

Petition for writ of rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.

183 Cal.App.4th 238 (2010) LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H033285. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. March 29, 2010. *240 Rosen, Bien & Galvan, Sanford Jay Rosen, Sarah Zimmerman, Lisa Ells, Michael W. Bien; Haynes and

DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (2007-08).1 As part of the 2007-2009 state budget, 2007 Wis. Act 20 (the Act), the legislature transferred $200 million from the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund (the Fund) to the Medical Assistance Trust Fund (MATF). 2007 Wis. Act 20, § 9225. To impl

236 S.W.2d 90 (1950) LEVITAN v. BANNIZA. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section. November 3, 1950. Certiorari Denied January 13, 1951. *92 J. J. Lutin, and Albert Williams, of Nashville, for plaintiff in error. Walker & Hooker, of Nashville, for defendant in error. Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court Janua

Owen, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county affirming an award of the Industrial Commission. It appears that on the 29th day of August, 1922, Susan Week was working in a sash and blind factory as the employee of the Morgan Company. While putting waste through a cut-off saw on that day she sustained the injury which resulted in her death. The Industrial Commission fo

Per Curiam. A bill of complaint was filed against the defendant in the circuit court for the county of Washtenaw, which is the home of the complainant. The defendant is a national bank organized under the laws of the. United States and is located in the county of Houghton in this State, where it conducts its business. Upon the filing of the bill of complaint, the defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction, up

800 F.Supp.2d 706 (2011) PRECISION LINKS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. USA PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Defendants. Civil Case No. 3:08cv576. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. July 14, 2011. *707 James M. Harrington, Harrington Law, P.C., Concord, NC, James F. Wood, III, Mil

975 F.Supp. 365 (1997) Joseph AMATEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet RENO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 96-2774(SS), 96-2790(SS), 97-00475(SS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 12, 1997. Joseph Amatel, Pro Se, Marjorie Lynn Rifkin, Margaret Winter, Nat'l. Prison Project of the ACLU Foundation, Washington, DC, for Joseph Amatel. <

58 F.Supp.2d 349 (1999) MOTOROLA INC., Plaintiff, v. PC-TEL, INC., and Altocom Inc., Defendants. Pc-Tel, Inc., Counter-Claimant, v. Motorola Inc., Counter-Defendant. Civil Action No. 98-598-GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 12, 1999. *350 Jack B. Blumenfeld of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, W

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 11, 2022 Decided June 17, 2022 No. 21-1120 TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS AMERICAN WHITEWATER, ET AL., INTERVENORS

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. *124 Appellants, financial guarantee insurers that had insured bonds from the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority ("PRHTA") (hereinafter the "Insurers"), appeal from the dismissal of their Amended Complaint in an adversary proceeding arising within th

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND .REMANDED. Pro se plaintiff Sonny Southerland filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of himself and his minor children *36against the City of New York, the Admin

05/12/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 14, 2017 Session JOYCE STOCKTON, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-13-6 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ______________________________

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA STATE WATER No. 20-72432 RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Intervenor. SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS No. 20-72452 LEAGUE; CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE; FRIENDS OF FERC Nos. THE RIVER;

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq„ strives to combat “labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general well-being of workers.” Id. § 202. To that en

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1080 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT