⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “LEONARD v. HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC”

District Court, D. Maryland · 2016-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 165 F. Supp. 3d 328; 61 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 3008; 2016 WL 362494; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10571
MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge Steven Malinowski, James E. Miley, Ray Dotzler, Andrew L. Frantz, and Wayne P. McMillen (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), citizens of New York and Pennsylvania and former employees of Trojan Horse, Ltd. (“Trojan Horse”), brought a proposed class action in diversity against The Lichter Group, LLC (“LGLLC” or “Defendant”), a limited liability company organ
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 275 F. Supp. 3d 1023
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Plaintiff Metro Sales, Inc. (“MSI”). (Doc. No. 59.) Also before the Court is MSI’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony. (Doc. No. 62.) Defendants Core Consulting Group, LLC (“Core”) and Rodger Mohagen (“Mohagen”) (collec
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-02-19 · Published · cited 157× · 688 F. Supp. 2d 598; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14573; 2010 WL 645253
688 F.Supp.2d 598 (2010) RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Nickie G. CAMMARATA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-07-0405. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 19, 2010. *607 David Allen Ward, Jr., The Ward Law Firm, The Woodlands, TX, for Plaintiff. Larry E. Demmons, Taggart
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019-01-18 · Published · cited 112× · 566 S.W.3d 671
Holly Kirby, J. We granted permission to appeal in this breach-of-contract case to address the use of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of contracts. Tennessee judges have long used extrinsic evidence of the context and circumstances at the time the parties entered into the contract to facilitate interpretation of contractual terms in accord with the parties' intent. However, t
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019-04-24 · Published · cited 70× · 599 B.R. 730
SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are motions by various Defendants seeking dismissal of the complaint in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the "Complaint") [ECF. No. 1 ] filed by 45 John Lofts LLC (the "Debtor" or "Plaintiff"). See Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion of Bo Jin Zhu and Crown Mansion LLC For Dismissal of the Adversary Proceeding (the "Zhu Motion") [ECF No. 17 ]; M
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIRJAM LETSCH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1840 (TJK) SOUTHERN PROPER HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Mirjam Letsch is a professional photographer who took the photo below that caught the eye of those pla
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 47× · 60 F. Supp. 3d 331; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160856; 2014 WL 6390299
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC (“Schwartzco”), a New York limited liability company; the Meat House — Roslyn LLC (“TMH Roslyn”), a New York limited liability company; and Arnold M. Schwartz, an individual resident of New *338York (collectively the “Plaintiffs”
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7113395 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-12 · Published · cited 16× · 339 F. Supp. 3d 262
[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 26× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 204× · 129 A.3d 816; 2015 Del. LEXIS 629; 2015 WL 7721882
VALIHURA, Justice: I. INTRODUCTION Pending before this Court is an appeal and cross-appeal arising out of a final judgment of the Court of 'Chancery finding that RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC” or “Appellant”) aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by former directors of *823 </
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 984 F. Supp. 2d 508; 2013 WL 5797205; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154680
*512 FINAL ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 6, 2013, and on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 20, 2013. The Motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard by Order on July 3, 2013, pursuant t
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014-09-23 · Published · cited 0× · 48 F. Supp. 3d 916; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133464; 2014 WL 4748571
ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. This litigation involves an insurance dispute arising out of a May 2011 tornado in Joplin, Missouri that destroyed two Arby’s restaurants owned and/or operated by Nola Ventures LLC, Nola Restaurant Group LLC, and Critical Mass Holdings LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Upshaw Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Upshaw”) and
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007-08-14 · Published · cited 1× · 509 F. Supp. 2d 593; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59381; 2007 WL 2350644
509 F.Supp.2d 593 (2007) ADVANCEME INC., Plaintiff v. RAPIDPAY, LLC, et al., Defendant. No. 6:05 CV 424. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. August 14, 2007. *594 *595 *596 *597
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-07-10 · Published · cited 39× · 874 F. Supp. 2d 147; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96137; 2012 WL 2856099
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff LaRoss Partners, LLC (“LaRoss”) commenced this action against Contact 911 Inc., (“Contact”) and FamilyContact911.com LLC (“Family”) based on claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraud, and conversion. The Defendants now move to dismiss the Plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-05-09 · Published · cited 4× · 315 F. Supp. 3d 1291
K. MICHAEL MOORE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1296This cause came before the Court upon Performance Orthopaedics & Neurosurgery, LLC d/b/a Calhoun Orthopaedics & Neurosurgery ("Calhoun"), Physicians Central Business Office, LLC ("CBO"), Mark Cereceda, D.C. ("Dr. Cereceda"), and Brian Mevorah, D.C.'s ("Dr. Mevorah") ("Defendan
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-12-04 · Published · cited 58× · 198 A.3d 1205
OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON Before this Court, in our original jurisdiction, is a petition for review challenging the constitutionality of the Act of October 30, 2017, P.L. 672, No. 43 (Act 43). Petitioners are Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC; Sky King Fireworks of Easton, Inc.; Sky King Fireworks of Erie, Inc.; Sky King Fireworks of Morrisville, Inc.; Sky King Fire
District Court, D. Kansas · 2007-10-01 · Published · cited 4× · 527 F. Supp. 2d 1257; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80208; 2007 WL 3051274
527 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2007) HEARTLAND SURGICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MIDWEST DIVISION, INC. d/b/a HCA Midwest Division, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-2164-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 1, 2007. *1258 *1259 *1260
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK