Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LEE v. BERRY”
Brittany Lee Berry v. Jackson County, Mississippipublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00643-COA BRITTANY LEE BERRY APPELLANT v. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. STEPHEN B. SIMPSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLA
Arthur Lee Berry v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed December 7, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01466-CR ARTHUR LEE BERRY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of A
Berry v. Leepublic domain
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. *784Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 87.
Berry v. Leepublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Terry Lee Battle v. Walter Berry, Wardenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 30, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A20A1895. TERRY LEE BATTLE v. WALTER BERRY, WARDEN. Prison inmate Terry Lee Battle filed a civil action against Warden Walter Berry. The trial court dismissed the action, and Battle filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Battle is incarcerated,
Christopher Lee Berry v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00416-CR No. 10-19-00417-CR No. 10-19-00418-CR CHRISTOPHER LEE BERRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 220th District Court
People of Michigan v. Gregory Lee Berrypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 23, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
People of Michigan v. Gregory Lee Berrypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 3, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
People of Michigan v. Gregory Lee Berrypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 12, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
People of Michigan v. Gregory Lee Berrypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 3, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Berry v. Leepublic domain
428 F.Supp.2d 546 (2006) Monique BERRY, Plaintiff, v. Choon Woo LEE a/k/a Jae Woo Lee, et al., Defendants. No. 3:05-CV-0014-D. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 8, 2006. *547 *548 *549 Ira Edwin Tobolowsky, Tobolowsky & Bu
United States v. Lee Berrypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0173p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Cherry Lee Berry v. Statepublic domain
</
Cherry Lee Berry v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-062-CR CHERRY LEE BERRY APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
People of Michigan v. Lee Henry Berrypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 11, 2009 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice
Berry v. Berrypublic domain
277 P.3d 771 (2012) Michael S. BERRY, Appellant, v. April L. BERRY, Appellee. No. S-14008. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 1, 2012. *773 Michael S. Berry, pro se, North Pole, Appellant. April L. Berry, pro se, Fairbanks, Appellee. Before: CARPENETI, Chief Justice, FABE, WINFREE, and STOWERS, Justices.
People v. Berrypublic domain
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 7, 2019.
People v. Berrypublic domain
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2018 *211order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The application for leave to appeal and the motion to remand remain pending.
People v. Berrypublic domain
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, *473and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michael Roberts and Judith Lee Berry v. Eva Wilsonpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS