Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LD v. United Behavioral Health”
Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, No. 21-16210 a Georgia non-profit organization, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:20-cv-05787-SI v. META PLATFORMS, INC., a OPINION Delaware corporation; MARK ZUCKERBERG, a California resident; THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES, INC., a Florida corporation; SCIENCE F
ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/10/2025 4:31 PM No. 15-24-00114-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
In Re Interest of LDpublic domain
398 N.W.2d 91 (1986) 224 Neb. 249 In re Interest of L.D., Z.D., N.D., and D.D., Children Under 18 Years of Age. Robert E. WHEELER, Guardian Ad Litem, Appellant, State of Nebraska, Appellee and Cross-Appellee, v. D.D., Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and S.D., Appellee. No. 86-310. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 19, 1986.
People in Interest of LDpublic domain
671 P.2d 940 (1983) PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner-Appellee, In the Interest of L.D. and D.D., Children, And Concerning M.D. and E.D., Respondents-Appellants. No. 82SA310. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. October 31, 1983. Thomas O. David, Weld County Atty., Kathy E. Dean, Lee D. Morrison, Asst. Weld County Attys., Greeley, for petitioner-appellee. <
S. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2021 OSM U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
Prokopeas v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: May 24, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * ELLENA PROKOPEAS and CHRIS * PUBLISHED PROKOPEAS, Parents of C.A.P., * A Minor, * Case No. 04-1717V * Peti
L. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-920V Filed: April 19, 2018 To Be Published ************************************* V.L., * * Petitioner, *
Becker v. Comm'y Health Sys., Inc..public domain
This opinion was flied for record -~ :R. carpeni9i Supreme Court Clark IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON GREGG BECKER, ) ) No. 90946-6 Respondent,
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part in the judgment and dissenting in part. Not so long ago, the idea of making nuns sign government documents they believe would involve them in grievous sins relating to life and death, or forcing devout Mennonites to pay for health insurance coverage for drugs and devices they view as abortifacients, would probably have been unthinkable i
Martin v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1221C Filed: January 30, 2025 Reissued for Publication: February 11, 20251 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ANTONIO MARTIN, * * Plaintiff, * * v.
United States v. Dana Curtinpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3368 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANA CURTIN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. Hinckleypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Criminal No. 81-306 (PLF) v. ) , ) JOHN W. HINCKLEY, JR. ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This matter came before the Court upon an agreement by the Government and Mr. John Hinckley for his unconditional release from his commitment. On September 27, 2021, the Court held a status conference at which counsel for the Government and counsel for Mr. Hinckley discussed Mr. Hinckley’s present mental stability and
Mone v. United Statespublic domain
ORgffiI$IAL lln tll,t @rite[ s.tstes @ourt of fe[ersl @lsimg No. 17- 18 l9 C (Filed: May 31,201s) FILED MAt 3 | 20t8 ) SADE MONE, )
United States v. Gamarrapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _ _4_- 4_ - f ___ ll ll UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. criminal No. 17-65 (JDB) FIl..ED 0£1192013` Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts JEAN-PAUL GAMARRA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The government moves to involuntarily medicate defendant Jean-Paul Gamarra, vvho suffers from mental illness, to render him competent to stand trial. Pursuant to Sell v. United Qat_e§, the Court must determine Whether “in light of t
Texas Health and Human Services Commission and Office of Inspector General v. Antoine Dental Centerpublic domain
ACCEPTED 06-15-00076-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/9/2015 4:47:09
Ward v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND REMAND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. This military pay case comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the Administrative Record (“AR”), Plaintiff, Matthew Ward, was medically discharged from the Army as . being unfit for duty due to severe gastroesophageal reflux and was not awarded disability benefits. Plaintiff claims the di
United States v. Conleypublic domain
Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon Movant Timothy Alexander Conley's petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [R. 153.] Consistent with local practice, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Robert E. Wier, wh
Veasey v. United Statespublic domain
oRl0lNAt llntbt @nfte[ btstts @ourt of felrrul @lsrms No. 15-694C HLED July 30, 2015 JUL 3 0 20t5 * {. :} ,i( * * ,1. '} *,} * * * * * {. *:t ,}
OPINION OF THE COURT Joel K. Asarch, J. *731Each year, tens of thousands of people find themselves homeless. Estimates in New York City indicate that over 100,000 people experience homelessness during the course of a year, a large percentage of whom have chronic mental illnesses.1 In Nassau County, statistics from 1991 i
Nelida Cabeda v. Attorney General United Statespublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 19-1835 _____________ NELIDA BEATRIZ CABEDA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Unite