Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LAUREN JADE LONG”
Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. Jade M., the mother of Levi H. and Maddox M. (the children), and her husband, Michael M., the father of Maddox, appeal the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders placing the children in out-of-home care based on Michael’s physical abuse of Maddox. Michael contends the court erred by designating Andrew H. the presumed father of Levi based on a voluntary declaration of pa
Ja. B. v. Wilson Cnty. Bd. of Educ.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0036p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JA. B., Student; M. B. and JO. B., in their own │ capaciti
King v. Aramark Services Inc.public domain
22-1237 King v. Aramark Services Inc. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: September 20, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2024) Docket No. 22-1237 KRISTEN KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Crowe v. Leroy Central School Districtpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The instant employment discrimination case, involving claims that defendant violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.) was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), for supervision of all pre-trial proceedings. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on September 19
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
State v. Hobbspublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2022.10.07 Commission
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. On August 30, 2013, the defendants filed this motion to compel FHFA to produce documents it is currently withholding from discovery on the basis of the bank examination and deliberative process privileges. For the following reasons, the bank examination privilege applies to FHFA. The defendants’ request for a blanket order that all withheld docum
US Ecology, Inc. v. State of Californiapublic domain
111 Cal.Rptr.2d 689 (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 113 US ECOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents, Committee to Bridge the Gap et al., Movants and Respondents. No. D036933. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. September 5, 2001. Review Denied November 28, 2001.[*]
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. Sol Klayminc and four confederates appeal their convictions on a jury verdict for criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (1982), based upon violations, or the aiding and abetting of violations, of a permanent injunction of the Southern District, filed July 30, 1982, which prohibited infringement of the trademark of Louis Vuitton S.A., the well-known French manufacturer of high fashion handbags and
O'GRADY v. Superior Courtpublic domain
44 Cal.Rptr.3d 72 (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1423 Jason O'GRADY et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent; Apple Computer, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. H028579. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. May 26, 2006. *76 Law Offices of Richard R. Wiebe, Richard R. Wiebe, Berm
State v. Nincipublic domain
262 Kan. 21 (1997) 936 P.2d 1364 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. NINCI, Appellant. No. 74,725. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 18, 1997. *23 Elizabeth Seale Cateforis, assistant appellate defender, argued the cause, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, and
United States v. Klaymincpublic domain
780 F.2d 179 54 USLW 2348, 228 U.S.P.Q. 409 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. VUITTON ET FILS S.A., andLouis Vuitton S.A., Appellee,v.Barry Dean KLAYMINC, Nathan Helfand, George Cariste, Sol N.Klayminc, and Gerald J. Young, Appellants. Nos. 1294, 1305, 1312, 1351, 1354, Dockets 85-1068, 85-1075to 85-1078. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circ
State v. McElveenpublic domain
73 So.3d 1033 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Terry McELVEEN and Thatcher McElveen. No. 2010-KA-0172. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 28, 2011. Rehearing Denied October 21, 2011. *1042 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Andrew M. Pickett, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA,
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
ACCEPTED 15-25-00030-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35 PM NO. ________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
In Re Fort Bend County v. the State of Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35:10 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FILED: 2/6/2025 10:26 AM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri